Literature DB >> 31009061

Variance component tests of multivariate mediation effects under composite null hypotheses.

Yen-Tsung Huang1.   

Abstract

Mediation effects of multiple mediators are determined by two associations: one between an exposure and mediators ( S - M ) and the other between the mediators and an outcome conditional on the exposure ( M - Y ). The test for mediation effects is conducted under a composite null hypothesis, that is, either one of the S - M and M - Y associations is zero or both are zeros. Without accounting for the composite null, the type 1 error rate within a study containing a large number of multimediator tests may be much less than the expected. We propose a novel test to address the issue. For each mediation test j , j = 1 , … , J , we examine the S - M and M - Y associations using two separate variance component tests. Assuming a zero-mean working distribution with a common variance for the element-wise S - M (and M - Y ) associations, score tests for the variance components are constructed. We transform the test statistics into two normally distributed statistics under the null. Using a recently developed result, we conduct J hypothesis tests accounting for the composite null hypothesis by adjusting for the variances of the normally distributed statistics for the S - M and M - Y associations. Advantages of the proposed test over other methods are illustrated in simulation studies and a data application where we analyze lung cancer data from The Cancer Genome Atlas to investigate the smoking effect on gene expression through DNA methylation in 15 114 genes.
© 2019 The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  composite null hypothesis; intersection-union test; joint significance test; mediation analyses; normal product distribution

Year:  2019        PMID: 31009061     DOI: 10.1111/biom.13073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

Review 1.  Methodological challenges in constructing DNA methylation risk scores.

Authors:  Anke Hüls; Darina Czamara
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.528

2.  Bayesian hierarchical models for high-dimensional mediation analysis with coordinated selection of correlated mediators.

Authors:  Yanyi Song; Xiang Zhou; Jian Kang; Max T Aung; Min Zhang; Wei Zhao; Belinda L Needham; Sharon L R Kardia; Yongmei Liu; John D Meeker; Jennifer A Smith; Bhramar Mukherjee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 2.497

3.  Group testing in mediation analysis.

Authors:  Andriy Derkach; Steven C Moore; Simina M Boca; Joshua N Sampson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  A comprehensive gene-centric pleiotropic association analysis for 14 psychiatric disorders with GWAS summary statistics.

Authors:  Haojie Lu; Jiahao Qiao; Zhonghe Shao; Ting Wang; Shuiping Huang; Ping Zeng
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 5.  Statistical methods for mediation analysis in the era of high-throughput genomics: Current successes and future challenges.

Authors:  Ping Zeng; Zhonghe Shao; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  Leveraging Methylation Alterations to Discover Potential Causal Genes Associated With the Survival Risk of Cervical Cancer in TCGA Through a Two-Stage Inference Approach.

Authors:  Jinhui Zhang; Haojie Lu; Shuo Zhang; Ting Wang; Huashuo Zhao; Fengjun Guan; Ping Zeng
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.599

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.