Lei Yu1,2, Vladislav A Petyuk3, Shinya Tasaki1,2, Patricia A Boyle1,4, Chris Gaiteri1,2, Julie A Schneider1,2,5, Philip L De Jager6,7, David A Bennett1,2. 1. Rush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 2. Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 3. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington. 4. Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 5. Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois. 6. Center for Translational and Computational Neuroimmunology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York. 7. Cell Circuits Program, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Importance: β-Amyloid deposits are a pathologic hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD). However, the extent to which cortical β-amyloid protein in the absence of insoluble deposits is associated with classic features of AD appear to be unknown. Objective: To examine the associations of cortical β-amyloid protein in the absence of insoluble deposits with cognitive decline, neurofibrillary tangles, other age-associated neuropathologic conditions, and APOE. Design, Setting, and Participants: This analysis combines data from 2 community-based clinicopathologic cohort studies of aging. The Religious Orders Study started in 1994, and the Rush Memory and Aging Project started in 1997. Both studies are ongoing. Participants without known dementia were enrolled and agreed to annual clinical evaluations and brain donation after death. Primary analyses focused on individuals without β-amyloid deposits. Data analyses occurred in mid-September 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: β-Amyloid protein abundance was measured by targeted proteomics using selected reaction monitoring. β-Amyloid deposits were detected using immunohistochemistry. Other neuropathologic indices were quantified via uniform structured evaluation. Linear mixed models were used to examine the association of β-amyloid protein with cognitive decline. Regression models examined the protein associations with neuropathologic outcomes and the APOE genotype. Results: By mid-September 2018, 3575 older persons were enrolled, and 1559 had died and undergone brain autopsy. Proteomic data were collected in 1208 individuals, and 5 with missing cognitive scores were excluded. Of the remaining 1203, primary analyses focused on 148 individuals (12.3%) without β-amyloid deposits. In this group, the mean (SD) age at death was 87.0 (7.0) years, and 84 individuals (56.8%) were women. In the absence of β-amyloid deposits, we did not observe an association of β-amyloid protein with decline in episodic memory, but the protein was associated with faster rates of decline in processing speed (mean [SE] change, -0.014 [0.005]; P = .008) and visuospatial abilities (mean [SE] change, -0.013 [0.005]; P = .006). We did not observe protein association with paired helical filament tau tangle density. The protein was associated with amyloid angiopathy (odds ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.15-1.67]; P < .001) but no other brain pathology. The associations with cognitive decline were unchanged after controlling for amyloid angiopathy. Neither APOE ε4 nor a polygenic Alzheimer risk score was associated with β-amyloid protein. Conclusions and Relevance: Cortical β-amyloid protein was associated with faster cognitive decline in the absence of β-amyloid deposits, which supports the role of cortical soluble β-amyloid as a neurotoxic agent in aging. The lack of protein association with paired helical filament tau tangles, episodic memory decline, or strong genetic drivers of deposited β-amyloid suggests an underlying neuropathologic change that may differ from that of AD.
Importance: β-Amyloid deposits are a pathologic hallmark of Alzheimer disease (AD). However, the extent to which cortical β-amyloid protein in the absence of insoluble deposits is associated with classic features of AD appear to be unknown. Objective: To examine the associations of cortical β-amyloid protein in the absence of insoluble deposits with cognitive decline, neurofibrillary tangles, other age-associated neuropathologic conditions, and APOE. Design, Setting, and Participants: This analysis combines data from 2 community-based clinicopathologic cohort studies of aging. The Religious Orders Study started in 1994, and the Rush Memory and Aging Project started in 1997. Both studies are ongoing. Participants without known dementia were enrolled and agreed to annual clinical evaluations and brain donation after death. Primary analyses focused on individuals without β-amyloid deposits. Data analyses occurred in mid-September 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: β-Amyloid protein abundance was measured by targeted proteomics using selected reaction monitoring. β-Amyloid deposits were detected using immunohistochemistry. Other neuropathologic indices were quantified via uniform structured evaluation. Linear mixed models were used to examine the association of β-amyloid protein with cognitive decline. Regression models examined the protein associations with neuropathologic outcomes and the APOE genotype. Results: By mid-September 2018, 3575 older persons were enrolled, and 1559 had died and undergone brain autopsy. Proteomic data were collected in 1208 individuals, and 5 with missing cognitive scores were excluded. Of the remaining 1203, primary analyses focused on 148 individuals (12.3%) without β-amyloid deposits. In this group, the mean (SD) age at death was 87.0 (7.0) years, and 84 individuals (56.8%) were women. In the absence of β-amyloid deposits, we did not observe an association of β-amyloid protein with decline in episodic memory, but the protein was associated with faster rates of decline in processing speed (mean [SE] change, -0.014 [0.005]; P = .008) and visuospatial abilities (mean [SE] change, -0.013 [0.005]; P = .006). We did not observe protein association with paired helical filament tau tangle density. The protein was associated with amyloid angiopathy (odds ratio, 1.38 [95% CI, 1.15-1.67]; P < .001) but no other brain pathology. The associations with cognitive decline were unchanged after controlling for amyloid angiopathy. Neither APOE ε4 nor a polygenic Alzheimer risk score was associated with β-amyloid protein. Conclusions and Relevance: Cortical β-amyloid protein was associated with faster cognitive decline in the absence of β-amyloid deposits, which supports the role of cortical soluble β-amyloid as a neurotoxic agent in aging. The lack of protein association with paired helical filament tau tangles, episodic memory decline, or strong genetic drivers of deposited β-amyloid suggests an underlying neuropathologic change that may differ from that of AD.
Authors: Ming Jin; Nina Shepardson; Ting Yang; Gang Chen; Dominic Walsh; Dennis J Selkoe Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Lei Yu; Vladislav A Petyuk; Chris Gaiteri; Sara Mostafavi; Tracy Young-Pearse; Raj C Shah; Aron S Buchman; Julie A Schneider; Paul D Piehowski; Ryan L Sontag; Thomas L Fillmore; Tujin Shi; Richard D Smith; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Patricia A Boyle; Lisa L Barnes; Robert S Wilson; Julie A Schneider Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Sergio T Ferreira; Mychael V Lourenco; Mauricio M Oliveira; Fernanda G De Felice Journal: Front Cell Neurosci Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 5.505
Authors: J C Lambert; C A Ibrahim-Verbaas; D Harold; A C Naj; R Sims; C Bellenguez; A L DeStafano; J C Bis; G W Beecham; B Grenier-Boley; G Russo; T A Thorton-Wells; N Jones; A V Smith; V Chouraki; C Thomas; M A Ikram; D Zelenika; B N Vardarajan; Y Kamatani; C F Lin; A Gerrish; H Schmidt; B Kunkle; M L Dunstan; A Ruiz; M T Bihoreau; S H Choi; C Reitz; F Pasquier; C Cruchaga; D Craig; N Amin; C Berr; O L Lopez; P L De Jager; V Deramecourt; J A Johnston; D Evans; S Lovestone; L Letenneur; F J Morón; D C Rubinsztein; G Eiriksdottir; K Sleegers; A M Goate; N Fiévet; M W Huentelman; M Gill; K Brown; M I Kamboh; L Keller; P Barberger-Gateau; B McGuiness; E B Larson; R Green; A J Myers; C Dufouil; S Todd; D Wallon; S Love; E Rogaeva; J Gallacher; P St George-Hyslop; J Clarimon; A Lleo; A Bayer; D W Tsuang; L Yu; M Tsolaki; P Bossù; G Spalletta; P Proitsi; J Collinge; S Sorbi; F Sanchez-Garcia; N C Fox; J Hardy; M C Deniz Naranjo; P Bosco; R Clarke; C Brayne; D Galimberti; M Mancuso; F Matthews; S Moebus; P Mecocci; M Del Zompo; W Maier; H Hampel; A Pilotto; M Bullido; F Panza; P Caffarra; B Nacmias; J R Gilbert; M Mayhaus; L Lannefelt; H Hakonarson; S Pichler; M M Carrasquillo; M Ingelsson; D Beekly; V Alvarez; F Zou; O Valladares; S G Younkin; E Coto; K L Hamilton-Nelson; W Gu; C Razquin; P Pastor; I Mateo; M J Owen; K M Faber; P V Jonsson; O Combarros; M C O'Donovan; L B Cantwell; H Soininen; D Blacker; S Mead; T H Mosley; D A Bennett; T B Harris; L Fratiglioni; C Holmes; R F de Bruijn; P Passmore; T J Montine; K Bettens; J I Rotter; A Brice; K Morgan; T M Foroud; W A Kukull; D Hannequin; J F Powell; M A Nalls; K Ritchie; K L Lunetta; J S Kauwe; E Boerwinkle; M Riemenschneider; M Boada; M Hiltuenen; E R Martin; R Schmidt; D Rujescu; L S Wang; J F Dartigues; R Mayeux; C Tzourio; A Hofman; M M Nöthen; C Graff; B M Psaty; L Jones; J L Haines; P A Holmans; M Lathrop; M A Pericak-Vance; L J Launer; L A Farrer; C M van Duijn; C Van Broeckhoven; V Moskvina; S Seshadri; J Williams; G D Schellenberg; P Amouyel Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-10-27 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Shinya Tasaki; Chris Gaiteri; Sara Mostafavi; Philip L De Jager; David A Bennett Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 4.677
Authors: Stephen D Ginsberg; Michael H Malek-Ahmadi; Melissa J Alldred; Yinghua Chen; Kewei Chen; Moses V Chao; Scott E Counts; Elliott J Mufson Journal: Neurobiol Dis Date: 2019-07-23 Impact factor: 5.996
Authors: Maa O Quartey; Jennifer N K Nyarko; Jason M Maley; Jocelyn R Barnes; Maria A C Bolanos; Ryan M Heistad; Kaeli J Knudsen; Paul R Pennington; Josef Buttigieg; Carlos E De Carvalho; Scot C Leary; Matthew P Parsons; Darrell D Mousseau Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hannah Stocker; Andreas Nabers; Laura Perna; Tobias Möllers; Dan Rujescu; Annette M Hartmann; Bernd Holleczek; Ben Schöttker; Julia Stockmann; Klaus Gerwert; Hermann Brenner Journal: Transl Psychiatry Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Songlin Li; Eric Y Hayden; Veronica J Garcia; Dieu-Trang Fuchs; Julia Sheyn; David A Daley; Altan Rentsendorj; Tania Torbati; Keith L Black; Ueli Rutishauser; David B Teplow; Yosef Koronyo; Maya Koronyo-Hamaoui Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 8.786