| Literature DB >> 31008407 |
Virendra R Mishra1, Karthik R Sreenivasan1, Xiaowei Zhuang1, Zhengshi Yang1, Dietmar Cordes1,2, Ryan R Walsh3.
Abstract
Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) studies in early Parkinson's disease (PD) to understand pathologic changes in white matter (WM) organization are variable in their findings. Evaluation of different analytic techniques frequently employed to understand the DTI-derived change in WM organization in a multisite, well-characterized, early stage PD cohort should aid the identification of the most robust analytic techniques to be used to investigate WM pathology in this disease, an important unmet need in the field. Thus, region of interest (ROI)-based analysis, voxel-based morphometry (VBM) analysis with varying spatial smoothing, and the two most widely used skeletonwise approaches (tract-based spatial statistics, TBSS, and tensor-based registration, DTI-TK) were evaluated in a DTI dataset of early PD and Healthy Controls (HC) from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) cohort. Statistical tests on the DTI-derived metrics were conducted using a nonparametric approach from this cohort of early PD, after rigorously controlling for motion and signal artifacts during DTI scan which are frequent confounds in this disease population. Both TBSS and DTI-TK revealed a significantly negative correlation of fractional anisotropy (FA) with disease duration. However, only DTI-TK revealed radial diffusivity (RD) to be driving this FA correlation with disease duration. HC had a significantly positive correlation of MD with cumulative DaT score in the right middle-frontal cortex after a minimum smoothing level (at least 13mm) was attained. The present study found that scalar DTI-derived measures such as FA, MD, and RD should be used as imaging biomarkers with caution in early PD as the conclusions derived from them are heavily dependent on the choice of the analysis used. This study further demonstrated DTI-TK may be used to understand changes in DTI-derived measures with disease progression as it was found to be more accurate than TBSS. In addition, no singular region was identified that could explain both disease duration and severity in early PD. The results of this study should help standardize the utilization of DTI-derived measures in PD in an effort to improve comparability across studies and time, and to minimize variability in reported results due to variation in techniques.Entities:
Keywords: Neuroscience
Year: 2019 PMID: 31008407 PMCID: PMC6458486 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01481
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Participant demographics. Results of pairwise statistical comparisons are shown as p-values. Of note, Dopamine Transporter (DaT) score of caudate and putamen in both hemispheres was integrated for each subject. *Significance was established at p < 0.05. NS: Non-significant; NA: Not-applicable; means are reported ±SD.
| Demographics | Healthy Controls (HC) | Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients | HC vs PD |
|---|---|---|---|
| | 15 | 29 | NS(p = 0.85) |
| | 29 | 52 | |
| | 5 | 7 | NS(p = 0.1) |
| | 34 | 72 | |
| | 5 | 2 | |
| 61 ± 10.79 | 61.35 ± 9.93 | NS(p = 1) | |
| 15.86 ± 3.17 | 15.44 ± 3.03 | NS(p = 0.46) | |
| NA | 11.46 ± 13.85 | NA | |
| NA | 18.72 ± 8.13 | NA | |
| 28.16 ± 1.12 | 27.4 ± 2.14 | NS(p = 0.12) | |
| NA | 36/45 | NA | |
| | NA | 31 | NA |
| | NA | 49 | |
| | NA | 1 | |
| 1.25 ± 0.43 | 1.31 ± 0.4 | NS(p = 0.47) | |
| | 3 | 12 | NS(p = 0.3) |
| | 5 | 7 | |
| | 2 | 7 | |
| | 6 | 10 | |
| | 3 | 5 | |
| | 6 | 12 | |
| | 1 | 1 | |
| | 5 | 13 | |
| | 9 | 14 | |
| | 4 | 0 | |
Fig. 1Skeletonwise results of WM organization in PD. The location of the cluster showing a significantly (pcorr<0.05) negative relationship between FA and disease duration using both TBSS (a) and DTI-TK (b). The top and bottom panel of (b) shows the location of the cluster showing a significantly (pcorr<0.05) negative and positive relationship between FA (top panel) and RD (bottom panel), and disease duration using DTI-TK. R and L represent the right and left hemispheres respectively. Color bar represents the range of p-values in the overlaid cluster.
Fig. 2VBM-based results of the effect of smoothing before statistical analysis. (a) Top panel: Location of the cluster, involving right middle frontal gyrus, where MD in HC was significantly (pcorr<0.05) correlated with DaT score. Bottom panel: Scatterplot of the extent of the cluster and p-values as a function of spatial smoothing (left panel), along with scatterplot of the extent of the cluster and effect size as a function of spatial smoothing (right panel) is shown. R and L represent the right and left hemispheres respectively.
Summary of findings. Regions that were found to be significantly different between groups or correlated with clinical variables are listed for each analysis technique to compare DTI-derived measurements in early stage PD. NA: Not-applicable.
| Hypotheses tested | Skeletonwise | Voxelwise | ROI-based | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are DTI-derived measures in PD different than HC? | Findings | No regions found to be significantly different. | No regions found to be significantly different. | No regions found to be significantly different. | No regions found to be significantly different. |
| Effect of Smoothing | NA | NA | No effect of smoothing | NA | |
| Effect of Scanning Site | No effect of scanning site | No effect of scanning site | No effect of scanning site | No effect of scanning site | |
| Univariate or Multivariate? | Both | Both | NA | Both | |
| Are DTI-derived measures correlated with clinical scores? | Findings | Negative correlation with disease duration and FA in the WM tracts of left IFO, left CST, left ILF, bilateral ATR, left SLF, bilateral CGC, and corpus callosum | Negative correlation with disease duration and FA in the WM tracts of corpus callosum, bilateral IFO, bilateral CST, bilateral ILF, bilateral ATR, bilateral SLF, and bilateral CGC. | MD of right middle frontal gyrus negatively associated with DaT score in HC | No regions found to be significantly different. |
| Effect of Smoothing | NA | NA | Smoothing>=13mm>=5mm | NA | |
| Effect of Scanning Site | Only when scanning site was used as a covariate | Only when scanning site was used as a covariate | Only when scanning site was not used as a covariate | No effect of scanning site | |
| Univariate or Multivariate? | Univariate | Univariate | NA | NA | |
Consistency of findings across different analytical techniques. Hypotheses were tested for four different analytic technique, namely TBSS skeletonwise, DTI-TK skeletonwise, voxelwise, and ROI-based under two different conditions, (a) when scanning site was used as a nuisance regressor and (b) when scanning site was not used as a nuisance regressor. False-positive rate was controlled for every hypothesis within every DTI-derived metric using non-parametric statistics, and independently controlled for whether scanning site was used a nuisance regressor. ✓ is shown for the columns when the observed conclusion is in accordance with the hypothesis being tested, otherwise they are shown as ✕. For example: Only DTI-TK based skeletonwise analytical technique showed a negative correlation between RD and disease duration for PD participants but only when scanning site was used as a covariate in the statistical model. This finding is indicated by “Only when scanning site was used as a covariate” in the column, ✕ in TBSS column within column, ✓ in DTI-TK within column, NA for voxelwise (as no voxelwise comparison was conducted for RD), and ✕ for ROI-based technique. NA: Not-applicable.
| Hypothesis Tested | DTI-derived metric | Findings | Scanning site used as a covariate in the statistical model | Analytic technique used | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skeletonwise | Voxelwise | ROI-based | |||||
| TBSS | DTI-TK | ||||||
| HC vs PD | FA | No difference | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ |
| MD | No difference | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| AD | No difference | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| RD | No difference | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| Multivariate | No difference | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| Disease duration | FA | Negative correlation | Only when scanning site was | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✕ |
| MD | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| AD | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| RD | Positive correlation | Only when scanning site was | ✕ | ✓ | NA | ✕ | |
| Multivariate | No difference | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| MDS-UPDRS-III | FA | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ |
| MD | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |
| AD | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| RD | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| Multivariate | No difference | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| Cumulative DaT Score | FA | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ |
| MD | Negative correlation in HC (only when smoothing >=13mm) | Only when scanning site was | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ | ✕ | |
| AD | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| RD | No correlation | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |
| Multivariate | No difference | Irrespective of whether scanning site was used as a covariate | ✓ | ✓ | NA | ✓ | |