David Darehed1,2, Bo Norrving3, Birgitta Stegmayr2, Karin Zingmark4,5, Mathias C Blom6. 1. Department of Medicine, Gällivare Hospital, Sweden. 2. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Sweden. 3. Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Sweden. 4. Department of Health Science, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. 5. Department of Research and Development, County Council of Norrbotten, Sweden. 6. Department of Clinical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Lund University, Sweden.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It is well established that managing patients with acute stroke in dedicated stroke units is associated with improved functioning and survival. The objectives of this study are to investigate whether patients with acute stroke are less likely to be directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department when hospital beds are scarce and to measure variation across hospitals in terms of this outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This register study comprised data on patients with acute stroke admitted to 14 out of 72 Swedish hospitals in 2011-2014. Data from the Swedish stroke register were linked to administrative daily data on hospital bed occupancy (measured at 6 a.m.). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the association between bed occupancy and direct stroke unit admission. RESULTS: A total of 13,955 hospital admissions were included; 79.6% were directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department. Each percentage increase in hospital bed occupancy was associated with a 1.5% decrease in odds of direct admission to a stroke unit (odds ratio = 0.985, 95% confidence interval = 0.978-0.992). The best-performing hospital exhibited an odds ratio of 3.8 (95% confidence interval = 2.6-5.5) for direct admission to a stroke unit versus the reference hospital. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We found an association between hospital crowding and reduced quality of care in acute stroke, portrayed by a lower likelihood of patients being directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department. The magnitude of the effect varied considerably across hospitals.
INTRODUCTION: It is well established that managing patients with acute stroke in dedicated stroke units is associated with improved functioning and survival. The objectives of this study are to investigate whether patients with acute stroke are less likely to be directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department when hospital beds are scarce and to measure variation across hospitals in terms of this outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This register study comprised data on patients with acute stroke admitted to 14 out of 72 Swedish hospitals in 2011-2014. Data from the Swedish stroke register were linked to administrative daily data on hospital bed occupancy (measured at 6 a.m.). Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the association between bed occupancy and direct stroke unit admission. RESULTS: A total of 13,955 hospital admissions were included; 79.6% were directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department. Each percentage increase in hospital bed occupancy was associated with a 1.5% decrease in odds of direct admission to a stroke unit (odds ratio = 0.985, 95% confidence interval = 0.978-0.992). The best-performing hospital exhibited an odds ratio of 3.8 (95% confidence interval = 2.6-5.5) for direct admission to a stroke unit versus the reference hospital. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We found an association between hospital crowding and reduced quality of care in acute stroke, portrayed by a lower likelihood of patients being directly admitted to a stroke unit from the Emergency Department. The magnitude of the effect varied considerably across hospitals.
Entities:
Keywords:
Stroke; The Swedish stroke register; bed crisis; emergency care; emergency department; hospital admission; hospital bed occupancy; stroke care; stroke unit
Authors: Niels K Rathlev; John Chessare; Jonathan Olshaker; Dan Obendorfer; Supriya D Mehta; Todd Rothenhaus; Steven Crespo; Brendan Magauran; Kathy Davidson; Richard Shemin; Keith Lewis; James M Becker; Linda Fisher; Linda Guy; Abbott Cooper; Eugene Litvak Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2007-01-16 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Marianna Virtanen; Jaana Pentti; Jussi Vahtera; Jane E Ferrie; Stephen A Stansfeld; Hans Helenius; Marko Elovainio; Teija Honkonen; Kirsi Terho; Tuula Oksanen; Mika Kivimäki Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Jennifer L Wiler; Christopher Gentle; James M Halfpenny; Alan Heins; Abhi Mehrotra; Michael G Mikhail; Diana Fite Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Mehul D Patel; Gilson Honvoh; Antonio R Fernandez; Rhonda Cadena; Emma R Kelly; Philip McDaniel; Jane H Brice Journal: South Med J Date: 2019-06 Impact factor: 0.954
Authors: David Darehed; Mathias Blom; Eva-Lotta Glader; Johan Niklasson; Bo Norrving; Marie Eriksson Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 4.003