Literature DB >> 31008273

Doctor's follow-up after stroke in the south of Sweden: An observational study from the Swedish stroke register (Riksstroke).

Teresa Ullberg1, Elisabet Zia1, Jesper Petersson1, Bo Norrving1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Information on follow-up practices after stroke in clinical routine are sparse. We studied the probability of doctor's follow-up within 90, 120, 180, and 365 days after hospital discharge, and how patient characteristics were associated with the probability of follow-up, in a large unselected stroke cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on patients living in southern Sweden, hospitalized with acute ischemic stroke or intracerebral hemorrhage 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2010, were obtained from the Swedish stroke register (Riksstroke) and merged with administrative data on doctor's visits during the year following stroke.
RESULTS: Complete data were registered in 8164 patients. The cumulative probability of a doctor's follow-up was 76.3% within 90 days, 83.6% within 120 days, 88.7% within 180 days, and 93.1% within 365 days. Using Cox regression calculating hazard ratios (HR), factors associated with 90-day follow-up were: female sex HR = 1.066 (95%CI: 1.014-1.121), age: ages 65-74 HR = 0.928 (95%CI: 0.863-0.999), ages 75-84 HR = 0.943 (95%CI: 0.880-1.011), ages 85 + HR = 0.836 (95%CI: 0.774-0.904), pre-stroke dependency in activities of daily living (ADL): HR = 0.902 (95%CI = 0.819-0.994), prior stroke HR = 0.902 (95%CI: 0.764-0.872), and severe stroke HR = 0.506 (95%CI: 0.407-0.629). In patients discharged to assisted living, the following factors were associated with lower follow-up probability: living alone pre-stroke HR = 0.836 (95%CI: 0.736-0.949), and pre-stroke dependency HR = 0.887 (95%CI: 0.775-0.991). DISCUSSION: This study was based on hospital administrative data of post-stroke doctor's visits, but may be confounded by attendance for other conditions than stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: One in four stroke patients was not followed up within three months after hospital discharge. Vulnerable patients with high age, pre-stroke ADL dependency, and prior stroke were less likely to receive doctor's follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stroke; cohort; follow-up; stroke organization; transition of care

Year:  2016        PMID: 31008273      PMCID: PMC6301231          DOI: 10.1177/2396987316650597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Stroke J        ISSN: 2396-9873


  35 in total

1.  Antithrombotic and antihypertensive management 3 months after ischemic stroke : a prospective study in an inner city population.

Authors:  T Hillen; R Dundas; E Lawrence; J A Stewart; A G Rudd; C D Wolfe
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  The impact of stroke nurse specialist input on risk factor modification: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Graham Ellis; Jan Rodger; Christine McAlpine; Peter Langhorne
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  The unmet needs of young people who have had a stroke: results of a national UK survey.

Authors:  P Kersten; J T S Low; A Ashburn; S L George; D L McLellan
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-11-10       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Discharge and follow-up for people with stroke: what happens and why.

Authors:  S Tyson; G Turner
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Mortality and cause of death after hospital discharge in 10,981 patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Kazumi Kimura; Kazuo Minematsu; Seiji Kazui; Takenori Yamaguchi
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 2.762

6.  Secondary prevention for stroke in the United Kingdom: results from the National Sentinel Audit of Stroke.

Authors:  Anthony G Rudd; Derek Lowe; Alexandra Hoffman; Penny Irwin; M Pearson
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 7.  Developing a primary care-based stroke model: the prevalence of longer-term problems experienced by patients and carers.

Authors:  Jenni Murray; John Young; Anne Forster; Robert Ashworth
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Quality of care in stroke prevention: results of an audit study among general practitioners.

Authors:  Johan S de Koning; Niek S Klazinga; Peter J Koudstaal; Ad Prins; Diederik W J Dippel; Jan Heeringa; Ruud P Kleyweg; Arie Knuistingh Neven; Jan W Van Ree; Gabriel J E Rinkel; Johan P Mackenbach
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Health care follow-up after stroke: opportunities for secondary prevention.

Authors:  Judith Redfern; Christopher McKevitt; Anthony G Rudd; Charles D A Wolfe
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Follow-up services for stroke survivors after hospital discharge--a randomized control study.

Authors:  Hanne Elkjaer Andersen; Karen Eriksen; Anne Brown; Kirsten Schultz-Larsen; Birgitte Hysse Forchhammer
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.477

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  mHealth Intervention Applications for Adults Living With the Effects of Stroke: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Suzanne P Burns; Madeleine Terblanche; Jaimee Perea; Hannah Lillard; Catalina DeLaPena; Noelle Grinage; Ashley MacKinen; Ella Elaine Cox
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  The health care utilisation and out-of-pocket expenditure associated with Australian stroke survivors aged 55 and over.

Authors:  David Sibbritt; Mahdie Hosseini; Wenbo Peng; Jessica Bayes; Jon Adams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.