| Literature DB >> 31007535 |
Vivian da Cruz Franco1, Paulo Cesar Peiter1, José Joaquim Carvajal-Cortés1, Rafael Dos Santos Pereira1, Margarete do Socorro Mendonça Gomes2, Martha Cecilia Suárez-Mutis1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The epidemiological surveillance of malaria is a necessary intervention for eliminating the disease from the planet. The international border zones of the Amazon continue to be highly vulnerable to malaria since population mobility impedes elimination. Although in the past few years, cases of malaria have had an essential reduction in Brazil, this trend was not confirmed in municipalities along the border. This study aimed to establish the epidemiology of the disease during the last 13 years in Oiapoque, a Brazilian municipality at the international border with French Guiana, an overseas department, to develop strategies for the control/elimination of malaria in these areas.Entities:
Keywords: Amazon; Elimination; Illegal gold miners; Malaria; Oiapoque
Year: 2019 PMID: 31007535 PMCID: PMC6458633 DOI: 10.1186/s41182-019-0150-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Trop Med Health ISSN: 1348-8945
Fig. 1a. Distribution of imported and autochthonous cases between 2003 and 2015 and API during the study period. b. Distribution of urban, indigenous and other rural cases during the study period. c. Distribution of indigenous cases by base poles and other villages. d. Proportion of malaria cases between men and women between 2003 and 2015
Fig. 2Endemic curve of malaria cases in the municipality of Oiapoque between 2003 and 2015. Source: Sivep-Malaria 2016
Fig. 3Spatial distribution of the incidence of malaria in the urban areas of the municipality of Oiapoque between 2003 and 2015. Source: Sivep-Malaria 2016
Cases of malaria reported in the municipality of Oiapoque, Amapá, Brazil, according to geographical area of origin, 2003–2015
| Year | Urban | Rural | Total case | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polo Kumarumã | Polo Kumenê | Polo Manga | Other villages | Other rural areas | Rural total | ||||||||||
|
| %* |
| %** |
| %** |
| %** |
| %** |
| %** |
| %* | ||
| 2003 | 134 | 14.3 | 7 | 0.9 | 5 | 0.1 | 46 | 5.7 | 60 | 7.5 | 686 | 85.3 | 804 | 85.7 | 938 |
| 2004 | 142 | 16.0 | 20 | 2.7 | 24 | 3.2 | 174 | 23.4 | 48 | 6.5 | 477 | 64.2 | 743 | 84.0 | 885 |
| 2005 | 335 | 25.5 | 35 | 3.6 | 47 | 4.8 | 176 | 17.9 | 80 | 8.2 | 643 | 65.5 | 981 | 74.5 | 1316 |
| 2006 | 395 | 15.9 | 64 | 3.1 | 353 | 16.9 | 572 | 27.3 | 255 | 12.2 | 850 | 40.6 | 2094 | 84.1 | 2489 |
| 2007 | 380 | 13.8 | 134 | 5.7 | 309 | 13.1 | 934 | 39.5 | 254 | 10.7 | 735 | 31.1 | 2366 | 86.2 | 2746 |
| 2008 | 769 | 23.8 | 449 | 18.2 | 368 | 15.0 | 675 | 27.4 | 208 | 8.5 | 761 | 30.9 | 2461 | 76.2 | 3230 |
| 2009 | 815 | 24.1 | 418 | 16.3 | 586 | 22.8 | 839 | 32.6 | 113 | 4.4 | 616 | 24.0 | 2572 | 75.9 | 3387 |
| 2010 | 1451 | 37.4 | 184 | 7.6 | 587 | 24.2 | 611 | 25.2 | 226 | 9.3 | 818 | 33.7 | 2426 | 62.6 | 3877 |
| 2011 | 1822 | 41.6 | 178 | 7.0 | 833 | 32.5 | 684 | 26.7 | 694 | 27.1 | 171 | 6.7 | 2560 | 58.4 | 4382 |
| 2012 | 1269 | 53.7 | 33 | 3.0 | 169 | 15.4 | 375 | 34.2 | 204 | 18.6 | 315 | 28.7 | 1096 | 46.3 | 2365 |
| 2013 | 606 | 57.7 | 13 | 2.9 | 67 | 15.1 | 272 | 61.3 | 72 | 16.2 | 20 | 4.5 | 444 | 42.3 | 1050 |
| 2014 | 352 | 55.7 | 2 | 0.7 | 22 | 7.9 | 98 | 35.0 | 77 | 27.5 | 81 | 28.9 | 280 | 44.3 | 632 |
| 2015 | 333 | 32.4 | 2 | 0.3 | 186 | 26.7 | 238 | 34.2 | 53 | 7.6 | 217 | 31.2 | 696 | 67.6 | 1029 |
| Total | 8803 | 31.1 | 1539 | 7.9 | 3556 | 18.2 | 5694 | 29.2 | 2344 | 12.0 | 6172 | 31.6 | 19,523 | 68.9 | 28,326 |
*Percentage of total municipality
**Percentage of total rural area
Fig. 4Proportion of cases by parasite species and rate of Falciparum + vivax between 2003 and 2015. Source: Sivep-Malaria 2016
Fig. 5Cases of malaria and rate of proportion of men and individuals under 15 years between 2003 and 2015
Fig. 6Geographic location the municipality of Oiapoque-Amapá State Brazil