| Literature DB >> 31007423 |
Apoorva Pauranik1, Annamma George2, Aparna Sahu3, Ashima Nehra4, Avanthi Paplikar5, Chitralekha Bhat6, Gopee Krishnan7, Harsimar Kaur8, Jitendra Saini9, P A Suresh10, Pawan Ojha11, Pinky Singh12, Pratap Sancheti13, Prathibha Karanth14, P S Mathuranath15, Satyapal Goswami16, Sonal Chitnis17, N Sundar3, Suvarna Alladi15, Yasmeen Faroqi-Shah18.
Abstract
A multidisciplinary team of experts took stock of the current state of affairs about many aspects of aphasia in India, including community burden, diagnostic assessment, therapy, rehabilitation, research, education, and advocacy. The broad spectrum of aphasiology was matched by the types of participants ranging from neurologists, speech-language pathologists, clinical psychologists, linguists, to experts in neuroimaging and computer sciences. Threadbare discussion in 16 sessions over 3 days leads to the identification of pressing problems and possible solutions. Many action plans have been envisaged and recommendations made. A few examples with high priority are community-based and hospital-based study incidence and prevalence of aphasia, development of test batteries for the assessment of many components of speech and communication in Indian languages which are validated on rigorous psychometric, and linguistic criteria, national registry for aphasia, educational modules about aphasia for different target groups, resources for advocacy and its training, a bank of research questions and outlines of research protocols for young professionals to pursue. The expert group will continue to oversee execution of some of the actionable plans in short and long term.Entities:
Keywords: Action plans; aphasia in India; recommendations
Year: 2019 PMID: 31007423 PMCID: PMC6472241 DOI: 10.4103/aian.AIAN_330_18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Indian Acad Neurol ISSN: 0972-2327 Impact factor: 1.383
Recommendations and action plans
| Epidemiology and surveys |
| Multicenter retrospective and prospective hospital-based study of the prevalence of aphasia in stroke |
| Community-based study of prevalence and incidence of aphasia and other disorders of speech and communication |
| Establishment of national aphasia registry along with facility for archiving our clinical and imaging data (with or without affiliation to International Aphasia Bank) |
| To collect and compile population-based data about multilingualism in different states and regions of India from authentic sources and make them accessible for clinicians |
| To plan comprehensive national survey about types of SLT, its duration, and intensity, its theoretical basis and updatedness across the professional landscape of SLPs in India |
| Collection of normative data of language use with respect to many linguistic parameters |
| Documents, teaching modules, test batteries |
| To prepare a monograph on principles and practice of developing a valid test battery for assessment of aphasia in Indian languages |
| To compile a comprehensive inventory of tests developed and used by clinicians in India (some validated and published, while others not) and make them available for download on the website of our group and as hard copy for wide distribution (some gratis, some for sale) |
| To develop and validate test batteries for the assessment of various aspects of aphasia assessment, in the Indian context (including multilingual, reading, writing, caregiver burden) |
| A teaching module (in print and digital format) on “Aphasia for Linguists” |
| A monograph on “Linguistics for Clinicians” for SLPs, neurologists, and clinical neuro-psychologists |
| To develop evidence-based guidelines for choice of therapy language in Indian multilingual |
| To prepare teaching modules and test batteries about |
| Cognitive, behavioral, and psychiatric assessment in PWA for clinicians (SLP) |
| Speech, language, and communication functions in persons with dementia |
| To encourage standard brain imaging protocols (structural and functional) and reporting format for PWA, while increasing awareness about aphasia among the radiology community |
| To compile a comprehensive bank of research questions and outlines of research protocols for students, clinicians, and research scholars to pursue them |
| To create teaching modules for diverse target groups: MBBS, MD and DM residents, clinical psychologists, linguists, paramedical workers, occupation therapists, computer professions, PWA, caregivers, volunteers, and AYUSH practitioners covering aspects of assessment, therapy, and rehabilitation, along with a collection of educational videos |
| To create guidelines on the use of pharmacotherapy, noninvasive brain stimulation, stem cells, biological, etc., for members of IAN, NSI, API, IAP |
| Workshops |
| To plan workshops on research methodology and paper-writing skills for students and clinicians in aphasiology |
| To organize training workshops for SLPs, neurologists, clinical psychologists, and clinical linguists |
| To organize quizzes on aphasia for MD and DM residents and SLP students with attractive prizes |
| To plan regional educational sessions for PWA, their communication partners, and volunteers |
| To conduct an annual training program on advocacy skills for members of ISHA |
| Rehabilitation and therapy |
| To explore the role of Sheltered Workshops and Vocational Guidance Centers |
| To encourage and guide setting up facilities for tele-rehabilitation and training the personnel at multiple locations |
| To encourage and train for the use of AAC devices by PWA, SOs, and clinicians |
| Computer |
| Digitization of assessment batteries and therapy practice in Indian languages |
| To encourage the use of smartphone, tablets, and laptops as poststroke lifestyle monitors and devices for augmentative and alternative communication |
| Tele-therapy through existing platforms such as Skype, Facetime, and WhatsApp video calls |
| To plan development of software and applications for virtual therapy |
| Advocacy |
| To prepare a White Paper (Vision Document) on aphasia in long and short form, in English and Indian languages, and in printed text and digital formats and to get it distributed as a handy-talking tool for advocacy and awareness |
| To ensure that the stroke guidelines and clinical audit of quality measures for physicians issued by their professional bodies prominently highlight the imperative of early and repeated referral of PWA to SLPs |
| To lobby for approval for SLT from RCI, FDA, and similar authorities for coverage of expenses for extended periods, from medical insurance companies |
| To draft a note and popularize it, on “good practices for potential employers” |
| To launch a high visibility, long duration public education program in Indian languages using good-quality content in multiple formats |
| To identify and approach public celebrities at national and local levels to act as brand ambassador for aphasia |
| To create and support a network of PSGs in many cities across India along with a manual for good operation of PSGs |
| To draft a “Bill of Rights” for PWA and get it prominently displayed and distributed |
SLP=Speech and language pathology, PWA=Persons with aphasia, SLP=Speech and language pathology, PWA=Persons with aphasia, IAN=Indian Academy of Neurology, ISHA=Indian Speech and Hearing Association, AAC=Augmentative and Assistive Communication, SOs=Significant others, RCI=Rehabilitation Council of India, SLT=Speech-language therapy, FDA=Food and Drug Administration, PSGs=Patient-support groups, NSI=Neurology Society of India, API=Association of Physicians of India, IAP=Indian Academy of Pediatrics
Top ten best practice recommendations for aphasia*
| 1 | All patients with brain damage or brain disease should be screened for communication deficits |
| 2 | People with suspected communication deficits should be assessed by a qualified professional (determined by country); assessment should extend beyond the use of screening measures to determine the nature, severity, and personal consequences of the suspected communication deficit |
| 3 | People with aphasia should receive information regarding aphasia, etiologies of aphasia (e.g., stroke) and options for treatment. This applies throughout all stages of healthcare from acute to chronic stages |
| 4 | No one with aphasia should be discharged from services without some means of communicating his or her needs and wishes (e.g., using AAC, supports, trained partners) or a documented plan of how and when this will be achieved |
| 5 | People with aphasia should be offered intensive and individualized aphasia therapy designed to have a meaningful impact on communication and life. This intervention should be designed and delivered under the supervision of a qualified professional |
| Intervention might consist of impairment-oriented therapy, compensatory training, conversation therapy, functional/participation-oriented therapy, environmental intervention, and/or training in communication supports or AAC | |
| Modes of delivery might include individual therapy, group therapy, tele-rehabilitation and/or computer-assisted treatment | |
| Individuals due to stable (e.g., stroke) as well as progressive forms of brain damage should be offered intervention | |
| Individuals due to stroke and other static forms of brain damage can benefit from intervention in both acute and chronic recovery phases | |
| 6 | Communication partner training should be provided to improve communication of people with aphasia |
| 7 | Families or caregivers of people with aphasia should be included in the rehabilitation process |
| Family and carers should receive education and support regarding the causes and consequences of aphasia | |
| Families and carers should learn to communicate with the person with aphasia | |
| 8 | Services for people with aphasia should be culturally appropriate and personally relevant |
| 9 | All health and social care providers working with people with aphasia across the continuum of care (i.e., acute care to end of life) should be educated about aphasia and trained to support communication in aphasia |
| 10 | Information intended for use by people with aphasia should be available in aphasia-friendly/communicatively accessible formats |
*All best practice recommendations are underpinned by different levels of evidence. The levels of evidence are not stated in the above table as they use a different system of defining evidence level. AAC=Augmentative and alternative communication