| Literature DB >> 31007417 |
B Fidalgo1, M Chilmeran1, T Somorin1, A Sowale1, A Kolios1, A Parker1, L Williams1, M Collins1, E J McAdam1, S Tyrrel1.
Abstract
The "Reinvent the Toilet Challenge" set by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation aims to bring access to adequate sanitary systems to billions of people. In response to this challenge, on-site sanitation systems are proposed and being developed globally. These systems require in-situ thermal treatment, processes that are not well understood for human faeces (HF). Thermogravimetric analysis has been used to investigate the pyrolysis, gasification and combustion of HF. The results are compared to the thermal behaviour of simulant faeces (SF) and woody biomass (WB), along with the blends of HF and WB. Kinetic analysis was conducted using non-isothermal kinetics model-free methods, and the thermogravimetric data obtained for the combustion of HF, SS and WB. The results show that the devolatilisation of HF requires higher temperatures and rates are slower those of WB. Minimum temperatures of 475 K are required for fuel ignition. HF and SF showed similar thermal behaviour under pyrolysis, but not under combustion conditions. The activation energy for HF is 157.4 kJ/mol, relatively higher than SS and WB. Reaction order for HF is lower (n = 0.4) to WB (n = 0.6). In-situ treatment of HF in on-site sanitary systems can be designed for slow progressive burn.Entities:
Keywords: Combustion; Human faeces; Kinetics; Nano membrane toilet; Pyrolysis; Thermogravimetric analysis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31007417 PMCID: PMC6472681 DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.08.090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Renew Energy ISSN: 0960-1481 Impact factor: 8.001
Fig. 1Effect of heating rate on the thermal behaviour (TG curves) of human faeces under pyrolysis (N2), gasification (CO2) and combustion (Air) conditions: (a) 5 K/min; (b) 25 K/min; and, (c) 50 K/min. Data are given in dry ash free basis.
Fig. 2Effect of feedstock on the thermal behaviour (DTG curves) under: (a) pyrolysis (N2) conditions, (b) gasification (CO2) conditions, and (c) combustion (Air) conditions. HR = 5 K/min. Data are given in dry ash free basis.
Fig. 3Effect of the content of HF on the thermal behaviour (TG and DTG curves) of HF and WB blends under: (a), (b) pyrolysis (N2) conditions, and (c), (d) combustion (Air) conditions. HR = 50 K/min. Data are given in dry ash free basis.
Fig. 4Comparison of experimental (black line) and calculated (grey line) thermal behaviour (DTG curves) of HF and WB blends under combustion (Air) conditions. HR = 50 K/min. Data are given in dry ash free basis.
Fig. 5Activation energy, Ea, distribution at different conversion rates, α, determined from the FWO method for the combustion of human faeces (HF), simulant faeces (SF) and woody biomass (WB) samples.
Average activation energy values obtained by the OFW and Vy methods for the combustion human faeces (HF), simulant faeces (SF) and woody biomass (WB) samples.
| Sample | Ea (kJ/mol) - OFW | Ea (kJ/mol) - Vy |
|---|---|---|
| HF | 157.4 | 159.3 |
| SF | 126.6 | 128.5 |
| WB | 116.1 | 116.7 |
Reaction order obtained by the Avrami's method at different temperatures for the combustion human faeces (HF), simulant faeces (SF) and woody biomass (WB) samples.
| Temperature (K) | HF | SF | WB |
|---|---|---|---|
| 373 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.9 |
| 473 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.9 |
| 573 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| 673 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 773 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| 873 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| 973 | 0.5 | 0.07 | 0.3 |
| 1073 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.09 |
| Average | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
| Average | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |