| Literature DB >> 31007381 |
Jannik Martens1,2, Birgit Wild1,2, Christof Pearce2,3,4, Tommaso Tesi1,2,5, August Andersson1,2, Lisa Bröder1,2,6, Matt O'Regan2,3, Martin Jakobsson2,3, Martin Sköld7, Laura Gemery8, Thomas M Cronin8, Igor Semiletov9,10,11, Oleg V Dudarev9,10, Örjan Gustafsson1,2.
Abstract
Climate warming is expected to destabilize permafrost carbon (PF-C) by thaw-erosion and deepening of the seasonally thawed active layer and thereby promote PF-C mineralization to CO2 and CH4. A similar PF-C remobilization might have contributed to the increase in atmospheric CO2 during deglacial warming after the last glacial maximum. Using carbon isotopes and terrestrial biomarkers (Δ14C, δ13C, and lignin phenols), this study quantifies deposition of terrestrial carbon originating from permafrost in sediments from the Chukchi Sea (core SWERUS-L2-4-PC1). The sediment core reconstructs remobilization of permafrost carbon during the late Allerød warm period starting at 13,000 cal years before present (BP), the Younger Dryas, and the early Holocene warming until 11,000 cal years BP and compares this period with the late Holocene, from 3,650 years BP until present. Dual-carbon-isotope-based source apportionment demonstrates that Ice Complex Deposit-ice- and carbon-rich permafrost from the late Pleistocene (also referred to as Yedoma)-was the dominant source of organic carbon (66 ± 8%; mean ± standard deviation) to sediments during the end of the deglaciation, with fluxes more than twice as high (8.0 ± 4.6 g·m-2·year-1) as in the late Holocene (3.1 ± 1.0 g·m-2·year-1). These results are consistent with late deglacial PF-C remobilization observed in a Laptev Sea record, yet in contrast with PF-C sources, which at that location were dominated by active layer material from the Lena River watershed. Release of dormant PF-C from erosion of coastal permafrost during the end of the last deglaciation indicates vulnerability of Ice Complex Deposit in response to future warming and sea level changes.Entities:
Keywords: carbon isotope; climate change feedback; coastal erosion; deglaciation; past carbon cycling; permafrost
Year: 2019 PMID: 31007381 PMCID: PMC6472570 DOI: 10.1029/2018GB005969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Global Biogeochem Cycles ISSN: 0886-6236 Impact factor: 5.703
Figure 1Paleotopographic scheme of the East Siberian Arctic Shelf ~11,000 years BP with the location of the 4‐PC1 core (SWERUS‐C3 expedition 2014) in the Chukchi Sea (CS). The light gray shades show the International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean v3 bathymetry between 0‐ and 50‐m depth that approximately corresponds with the land exposed 11,000 cal years BP with an eustatic sea level of ~50 m below present (Jakobsson et al., 2012; Lambeck et al., 2014). The dark gray area with a black outline shows the current position of the coastline. Orange shades show the possible extent of ice and carbon‐rich deposits in Arctic and sub‐Arctic lowlands of Siberia and Alaska, as well as mapped and potential subsea ice and carbon‐rich deposits (Strauss et al., 2017). Target symbols in the LS and ESS show coring sites where historical permafrost carbon remobilization has been studied previously (LS/PC‐23 = Tesi, Muschitiello, et al., 2016; ESS/GC‐58 = Keskitalo et al., 2017). BS = Bering Strait; BFS = Beaufort Sea; ESS = East Siberian Sea; LS = Laptev Sea; bsl = below sea level.
Figure 3Record of carbon burial in the 4‐PC1 geoarchive compared with Greenland ice core data and sea level history; (a) North Greenland Ice Core Project members (2004) ice core data; (b) rate of sea level change (Lambeck et al., 2014); (c) 14C activity of OC at the time of deposition (ΔΔ14C); (d) δ13C of OC from the 4‐PC1 sediment core; (e) lignin phenol fluxes; (f) source fractions of ancient carbon‐rich permafrost (ICD), active layer and marine plankton (posterior mean ± standard deviation ranges from isotope‐based source proportion calculations are shown) and (g) resulting OC fluxes for the different organic matter source compartments. OC = organic carbon; PF = permafrost; ICD = Ice Complex Deposit.
Figure 2Dual‐isotope composition of OC in 4‐PC1 samples compared with end member ranges used for source apportionment. Active layer refers to the seasonally thawed permafrost surface and ICD to Pleistocene Ice Complex deposits (mean ± standard deviation). The marine OC end member changes at 11,000 cal years BP with the onset of Pacific water inflow as described in section 2.3.3. Note that the radiocarbon fingerprint of the deposited OC was corrected for the time since deposition at the site (i.e., Δ of the Δ14C). OC = organic carbon; BS = Bering Strait; BP = before present; ICD = Ice Complex Deposit.
Figure 4Lignin fingerprints of 4‐PC1 samples in comparison with Chukchi Sea surface sediments (Goñi et al., 2013), GC58 samples of the East Siberian Sea (Keskitalo et al., 2017), and PC23 samples of the Laptev Sea (Tesi, Muschitiello, et al., 2016), as well as of coastal ICD in Eastern Siberia (mean ± standard deviation from Tesi et al., 2014; Winterfeld et al., 2015) and active layer permafrost (Tesi et al., 2014). The ratio of syringyl to vanillyl lignin phenols (S/V) distinguishes between angiosperm and gymnosperm tissues and the ratio between cinnamyl and vanillyl phenols (C/V) between woody (e.g., stems) and nonwoody tissues (e.g., leaves). Source constraints were adopted from Goñi and Hedges (1995) and Hedges and Mann (1979). ICD = Ice Complex Deposit; BP = before present.