Literature DB >> 31007207

Perspectives and experiences of healthcare professionals regarding the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth.

Mirko Prosen1, Marina Tavčar Krajnc2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pregnancy and childbirth hold broader cultural and societal implications and entail more than simply a natural event. Today, these otherwise natural phenomena are driven by the development of surveillance medicine in a risk-averse society. This affects how both healthcare professionals and women perceive medicalisation and is influencing changes in clinical practice surrounding childbirth. AIM: The aim of the study was to explore the phenomenon of the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth in Slovenia as perceived and experienced by healthcare professionals, namely midwives and obstetricians.
METHODS: A descriptive phenomenological approach was used. A purposive sample included 16 midwives and 4 obstetricians working in perinatal healthcare. The data were collected using in-depth, semi-structured, one-to-one interviews and analysed using the phenomenological methodology approach proposed by Colaizzi.
FINDINGS: The two professional groups are well aware of the medicalisation of pregnancy and childbirth, yet there are some differences in experiencing these phenomena. This is revealed with respect to three identified themes: (1) medicalisation as a social construct; (2) unrecognised importance of evidence-based practice in changing medicalised care; and (3) the dimensionalities of the Caesarean section.
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests woman-centred care that supports autonomy should be more strongly promoted and strategies supporting women with different childbirth preferences developed. The findings also show interprofessional collaboration should be further explored since midwives' autonomy and participatory decision-making in clinical settings is encountering some unresolved issues within the scope of midwifery practice that affect their professionalism.
Copyright © 2018 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Midwives; Obstetricians; Risk; Woman-centred care; Women’s health

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 31007207     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2018.06.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  4 in total

1.  A Learning Healthcare System for pregnant and breastfeeding women: what do women during preconception, pregnancy, and nursing think? - A qualitative study : A contribution from the ConcePTION project.

Authors:  Marieke J Hollestelle; Rieke van der Graaf; Sarah Dewi Hartman; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Johannes J M van Delden
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Jordanian women's experiences and constructions of labour and birth in different settings, over time and across generations: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah Hussein; Hannah G Dahlen; Olayide Ogunsiji; Virginia Schmied
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Women and partners' experiences of critical perinatal events: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Laura Emdal Navne; Stinne Høgh; Marianne Johansen; Mette Nordahl Svendsen; Jette Led Sorensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-17       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review.

Authors:  Simon C Langley-Evans; Jo Pearce; Sarah Ellis
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 2.995

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.