| Literature DB >> 31007116 |
Nathalia Ap De Paula Camaforte1, Luiz Leonardo Saldanha1, Priscilla Maria Ponce Vareda1, João M Rezende-Neto2, Mario R Senger2, Aislan Q Delgado1, Henrique J N Morgan3, Natalia Moretti Violato1, Laís Goyos Pieroni1, Anne Lígia Dokkedal3, Floriano P Silva-Júnior2, José Roberto Bosqueiro4.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Bauhinia L. species, including Bauhinia holophylla (Bong.) Steud. (Fabaceae), have traditionally been used to treat diabetes. Bauhinia is a complex botanical genus, and the indiscriminate use of the diverse Bauhinia species is reflected in the experimental divergence of their medicinal potential.Entities:
Keywords: Antidiabetic; Fabaceae; flavonoid--glycosides; liver; plasma lipids
Year: 2019 PMID: 31007116 PMCID: PMC6493280 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2019.1599962
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
HPLC-PAD-MS data [Retention time (Rt), ultraviolet (UV) and detected ions (LC-MS ions)] and MS/MSn data of compounds identified in Bauhinia holophylla.
| Peak (ID) | Compound | Rt (min) | UV-vis ( | LC-MS ions [M-H]− | MS/MSn | Tentatively assignments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | myricetin- | 13.83 | 358/308sh/263 | 479.3 | 958, 316.7 | UV/MS |
| 2 | myricetin- | 16.51 | 363/268 | 449.1 | 898.5, 316.9 | UV/MS |
| 3 | myricetin- | 17.43 | 352/256 | 463.8 | 316.5 | UV/MS |
| 4 | quercetin- | 17.60 | 354/303sh/255 | 463.8 | 301.2 | UV/MS |
| 5 | quercetin- | 18.11 | 354/254 | 433.5 | 300.9 | UV/MS |
| 6 | quercetin- | 19.09 | 354/255 | 433.3 | 300.9 | UV/MS |
| 7 | quercetin- | 20.74 | 354/256 | 433.6 | 300.4 | UV/MS |
| 8 | quercetin- | 21.85 | 352/256 | 447.0 | 300.6 | UV/MS |
| 9 | kaempferol- | 23.07 | 361/263 | 417.2 | 285.4 | UV/MS |
| 10 | luteolin-deoxyhexose | 26.02 | 344/255 | 431.5 | 285.2 | UV/MS |
| 11 | Quercetin | 26.86 | 370/255 | 301.3 | 179,151, 137 | UV/MS |
| 12 | Luteolin | 29.08 | 350/253 | 285.3 | – | UV/MS |
| 13 | Isorhamnetin | 30.12 | 366/264 | 315.4 | 301.1 | UV/MS |
Peak data correspond with peak numbers in Figure 1.
Figure 1.Effect of Bauhinia holophylla treatment on glycaemia, glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity. (A) Average glycaemia during the treatment period. (B) Average glycaemia values during the intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (ipGTT). (C) Areas under the curves (AUC) values obtained from ipGTT experiment. (D) Average insulinaemia at the end of the treatment period and (E) HOMA-IR index of the groups. Bauhinia holophylla treatment significantly decreased glycaemia and HOMA-IR index. Basal insulin values were not changed, suggesting an extra-pancreatic action of the extract. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA followed by Tukeyʼs post-test, n = 8, p < 0.05).
Physical and biochemical parameters in various groups.
| Parameters | CTLSAL | CTLEXT400 | STZSAL | STZEXT400 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) – Day 1 | 45.3 ± 1.2 | 44.6 ± 1.5 | 45.3 ± 1.5 | 46.1 ± 1.3 |
| Body weight (g) – Day 14 | 47.0 ± 1.4a | 47.5 ± 1.5a | 35.0 ± 1.7b | 43.1 ± 1.7a |
| Food intake (g/100 g bw.day) | 18.9 ± 0.6a | 16.7 ± 0.3a | 35.7 ± 1.3b | 27.5 ± 0.5c |
| Water intake (mL/animal.day) | 11.8 ± 1.4a | 8.7 ± 1.3a | 60.7 ± 1.5b | 47.2 ± 2.5c |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 89.6 ± 8.7a | 93.8 ± 10.3a | 103.0 ± 5.5b | 72.7 ± 7.4c |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 107.1 ± 2.4a | 106.9 ± 5.5a | 138.9 ± 13.7b | 90.5 ± 3.8c |
| Total proteins (g/dL) | 5.3 ± 0.4a | 5.6 ± 0.3a | 5.3 ± 0.4a | 5.6 ± 0.5a |
| Muscle glycogen (mg/%) | 0.52 ± 0.06a | 0.53 ± 0.03a | 0.41 ± 0.03b | 0.41 ± 0.02b |
| Hepatic glycogen (mg/%) | 1.8 ± 0.2a | 1.6 ± 0.3a | 0.98 ± 0.1b | 1.8 ± 0.2c |
CTLSAL: Normoglycaemic mice treated with saline; CTLEXT: Normoglycaemic mice treated with Bauhinia holophylla extract (400 mg/kg); STZSAL: Diabetic mice treated with saline; STZEXT400: Diabetic mice treated with B. holophylla (400 mg/kg). Values are expressed as means ± SEM (n = 8/group). Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA followed by Tukeyʼs post-test, p < 0.05).
Figure 2.Liver glycogenesis stimulation by the treatment with Bauhinia holophylla extract. (A) The expression of PI3K, Akt, GSK3-β and GS genes analyzed by real-time PCR. (B) The expression of phosphorylated and total proteins by western blot. (C) Representative images of the proteins bands analyzed. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA followed by Tukeyʼs post-test, n = 8, p < 0.05).
Figure 3.Liver gluconeogenesis inhibition by the treatment with Bauhinia holophylla. (A) G6Pase and PEPCK genes expression analyzed by real-time PCR. (B) Protein expression of G6Pase, PEPCK and AMPK analyzed by western blot. (C) Representative images of the bands. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA followed by Tukeyʼs post-test, n = 8, p < 0.05).
Figure 4.Effect of Bauhinia holophylla treatment on gene and protein expression in muscle. (A) Expression of PI3K, Akt and Glut-4 genes. (B) Expression of phosphorylated and total forms of proteins involved in glucose uptake in muscles. (C) Representative images of the proteins analyzed. Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA followed by Tukeyʼs post-test, n = 8, p < 0.05).
Figure 5.The inhibitory effect of the Bauhinia holophylla treatment on intestinal enzymes. In vitro determination of the IC50 for α-amylase (A) and α-glucosidase (B). In vivo inhibition of α-amylase after an oral starch load (C) with the respective areas under the curves (D) and of α-glucosidase (E) with the respective areas under the curves (F). Different letters indicate significant differences (ANOVA followed by Tukeyʼs post-test, n = 6, p < 0.05).