Literature DB >> 31006937

The Yield of Computed Tomography of the Head Among Patients Presenting With Syncope: A Systematic Review.

J Alexander Viau1,2, Hina Chaudry1, Ailish Hannigan2, Mish Boutet3, Muhammad Mukarram1, Venkatesh Thiruganasambandamoorthy1,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Overuse of head computed tomography (CT) for syncope has been reported. However, there is no literature synthesis on this overuse. We undertook a systematic review to determine the use and yield of head CT and risk factors for serious intracranial conditions among syncope patients.
METHODS: We searched Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases from inception until June 2017. Studies including adult syncope patients with part or all of patients undergoing CT head were included. We excluded case reports, reviews, letters, and pediatric studies. Two independent reviewers screened the articles and collected data on CT head use, diagnostic yield (proportion with acute hemorrhage, tumors or infarct), and risk of bias. We report pooled percentages, I2 , and Cochran's Q-test.
RESULTS: Seventeen articles with 3,361 syncope patients were included. In eight ED studies (n = 1,669), 54.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 34.9%-73.2%) received head CT with a 3.8% (95% CI = 2.6%-5.1%) diagnostic yield and considerable heterogeneity. In six in-hospital studies (n = 1,289), 44.8% (95% CI = 26.4%-64.1%) received head CT with a 1.2% (95% CI = 0.5%-2.2%) yield and no heterogeneity. In two articles, all patients had CT (yield 2.3%) and the third enrolled patients ≥ 65 years old (yield 7.7%). Abnormal neurologic findings, age ≥ 65 years, trauma, warfarin use, and seizure/stroke history were identified as risk factors. The quality of all articles referenced was strong.
CONCLUSION: More than half of patients with syncope underwent CT head with a diagnostic yield of 1.1% to 3.8%. A future large prospective study is needed to develop a robust risk tool.
© 2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31006937     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  4 in total

Review 1.  How Should We Approach Syncope in the Emergency Department? Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Mustafa Emin Canakci; Omer Erdem Sevik; Nurdan Acar
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2022-06-27

2.  Choosing wisely in emergency medicine: Early results and insights from the ACEP emergency quality network (E-QUAL).

Authors:  Arjun K Venkatesh; Jean Elizabeth Scofi; Craig Rothenberg; Carl T Berdahl; Nalani Tarrant; Dhruv Sharma; Pawan Goyal; Randy Pilgrim; Kevin Klauer; Jeremiah D Schuur
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.469

Review 3.  Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elin Kjelle; Eivind Richter Andersen; Arne Magnus Krokeide; Lesley J J Soril; Leti van Bodegom-Vos; Fiona M Clement; Bjørn Morten Hofmann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.795

Review 4.  Planning Implementation Success of Syncope Clinical Practice Guidelines in the Emergency Department Using CFIR Framework.

Authors:  Jing Li; Susan S Smyth; Jessica M Clouser; Colleen A McMullen; Vedant Gupta; Mark V Williams
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 2.430

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.