Literature DB >> 31006565

Memory Performance Influences Male Reproductive Success in a Wild Bird.

Rachael C Shaw1, Regan D MacKinlay2, Nicola S Clayton3, Kevin C Burns2.   

Abstract

Despite decades of comparative research, how selection shapes the evolution of cognitive traits remains poorly understood [1-3]. Several lines of evidence suggest that natural selection acts on spatial memory in food-caching species [3-6]. However, a link between reproductive fitness and spatial memory ability has yet to be demonstrated in any caching species [1, 3, 6]. Here, we show that memory performance influences reproductive success differentially for males and females in a caching songbird, the New Zealand robin (Petroica longipes). Males' memory performance in a spatial task during winter influenced their subsequent breeding success; individuals with more accurate performance produced more fledglings and independent offspring per nesting attempt. Males with superior memory performance also provided an increased proportion of large prey items to chicks in the nest and spent less time flying while foraging and provisioning. No such effects were found for females. Previous research reveals that trade-offs may constrain selection and act to maintain variation in cognitive traits [7]. The gender dimorphism in the reproductive benefits of robin memory performance suggests an additional role for divergent selection between the sexes in constraining runaway selection on male memory ability [8], ultimately maintaining variation in this cognitive trait.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Petroica longipes; cognitive evolution; evolutionary ecology; fitness; food caching; parental investment; reproductive success; spatial memory

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31006565     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  7 in total

1.  Long-term repeatability of cognitive performance.

Authors:  Benjamin J Ashton; Alex Thornton; Maxime Cauchoix; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 3.653

2.  Exploring the interplay between natural and intersexual selection on the evolution of a cognitive trait.

Authors:  Marie Barou-Dagues; Frédérique Dubois
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 3.167

3.  Great tits who remember more accurately have difficulty forgetting, but variation is not driven by environmental harshness.

Authors:  Ethan Hermer; Ben Murphy; Alexis S Chaine; Julie Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Brain mass explains prey size selection better than beak, gizzard and body size in a benthivorous duck species.

Authors:  Karsten Laursen; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Cognition and reproductive success in cowbirds.

Authors:  David J White; J Arthur; H B Davies; M F Guigueno
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 1.986

6.  Does trappability and self-selection influence cognitive performance?

Authors:  Benjamin J Ashton; Alex Thornton; Elizabeth M Speechley; Amanda R Ridley
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 3.653

7.  Variation in inhibitory control does not influence social rank, foraging efficiency, or risk taking, in red junglefowl females.

Authors:  Laura Clare Garnham; Robert Boddington; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.899

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.