Angelica E Lang1, Soo Y Kim2, Stephan Milosavljevic2, Clark R Dickerson3. 1. Department of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canada. Electronic address: angelica.lang@usask.ca. 2. School of Rehabilitation Science, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Canada. 3. Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The acromion marker cluster (AMC) is a non-invasive scapular motion tracking method. However, it lacks testing in clinical populations, where unique challenges may present. This investigation resolved the utility of the AMC approach in a compromised clinical population. METHODS: The upper body of breast cancer survivors (BCS) and controls were tracked via motion capture and scapular landmarks palpated and recorded using a digitizer at static neutral to maximum elevation postures. The AMC tracked the scapula during dynamic maximum arm abduction. Both single (SC) and double calibration (DC) methods were applied to calculate scapular angles. The influences of calibration method, elevation, and group on mean and absolute error with two-way fixed ANOVAs with interactions (p < 0.05). Root mean square errors (RMSE) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: DC improved AMC estimation of palpated scapular orientation over SC, especially at higher arm elevations; RMSE averaged 11° higher for SC than DC at maximum elevation, but the methods were only 2.2° different at 90° elevation. DC of the AMC yielded mean error values of ∼5-10°. These approximate errors reported for AMC with young, lean adults. CONCLUSIONS: The AMC with DC is a non-invasive method with acceptable error for measuring scapular motion of BCS and age-matched controls.
INTRODUCTION: The acromion marker cluster (AMC) is a non-invasive scapular motion tracking method. However, it lacks testing in clinical populations, where unique challenges may present. This investigation resolved the utility of the AMC approach in a compromised clinical population. METHODS: The upper body of breast cancer survivors (BCS) and controls were tracked via motion capture and scapular landmarks palpated and recorded using a digitizer at static neutral to maximum elevation postures. The AMC tracked the scapula during dynamic maximum arm abduction. Both single (SC) and double calibration (DC) methods were applied to calculate scapular angles. The influences of calibration method, elevation, and group on mean and absolute error with two-way fixed ANOVAs with interactions (p < 0.05). Root mean square errors (RMSE) were calculated and compared. RESULTS: DC improved AMC estimation of palpated scapular orientation over SC, especially at higher arm elevations; RMSE averaged 11° higher for SC than DC at maximum elevation, but the methods were only 2.2° different at 90° elevation. DC of the AMC yielded mean error values of ∼5-10°. These approximate errors reported for AMC with young, lean adults. CONCLUSIONS: The AMC with DC is a non-invasive method with acceptable error for measuring scapular motion of BCS and age-matched controls.