Rohan Khera1, Yuanyuan Tang2, Saket Girotra3, Vinay M Nadkarni4,5, Mark S Link1, Tia T Raymond6, Anne-Marie Guerguerian7, Robert A Berg4,5, Paul S Chan2,8. 1. Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas (R.K., M.S.L.). 2. Mid-America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (Y.T., P.S.C.). 3. Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City (S.G.). 4. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA (V.M.N., R.A.B.). 5. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine and Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia (V.M.N., R.A.B.). 6. Division of Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical City Children's Hospital, Dallas, TX (T.T.R.). 7. The Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, ON, Canada (A.-M.G.). 8. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City (P.S.C.).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is initiated in hospitalized children with bradycardia and poor perfusion. However, their rate of progression to pulseless cardiac arrest despite CPR and the differences in survival compared with initially pulseless arrest are unknown. We examined the prevalence and predictors of survival of children who progress from bradycardia to pulseless in-hospital cardiac arrest despite CPR. METHODS: Pediatric patients >30 days and <18 years of age who received CPR at hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation during 2000 to 2016 were included. Each CPR event was classified as bradycardia with pulse, bradycardia with subsequent pulselessness, and initial pulseless cardiac arrest. We assessed risk-adjusted rates of survival to hospital discharge using multilevel Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 5592 pediatric patients were treated with CPR, of whom 2799 (50.1%) received CPR for bradycardia with poor perfusion and 2793 (49.9%) for initial pulseless cardiac arrest. Among those with bradycardia, 869 (31.0%, or 15.5% of cohort) became pulseless after a median of 3 minutes of CPR (interquartile range, 1-9 minutes). Rates of survival to discharge were 70.0% (1351 of 1930) for bradycardia with pulse, 30.1% (262 of 869) for bradycardia progressing to pulselessness, and 37.5% (1046 of 2793) for initial pulseless cardiac arrest (P for difference across groups <0.001). Children who became pulseless despite CPR for bradycardia had a 19% lower likelihood (risk ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70, 0.93]; P=0.004) of surviving to hospital discharge than those who were initially pulseless. Among children who progressed to pulselessness despite CPR for bradycardia, a longer interval between CPR and pulselessness was a predictor of lower survival (reference, <2 minutes; for 2-5 minutes, risk ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.41-0.70]; for >5 minutes, risk ratio, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.32-0.53]). CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized children in whom CPR is initiated, half have bradycardia with poor perfusion at the initiation of chest compressions, and nearly one-third of these progress to pulseless in-hospital cardiac arrest despite CPR. Survival was significantly lower for children who progress to pulselessness despite CPR compared with those who were initially pulseless. These findings suggest that pediatric patients who lose their pulse despite resuscitation attempts are at particularly high risk and require a renewed focus on postresuscitation care.
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is initiated in hospitalized children with bradycardia and poor perfusion. However, their rate of progression to pulseless cardiac arrest despite CPR and the differences in survival compared with initially pulseless arrest are unknown. We examined the prevalence and predictors of survival of children who progress from bradycardia to pulseless in-hospital cardiac arrest despite CPR. METHODS: Pediatric patients >30 days and <18 years of age who received CPR at hospitals participating in Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation during 2000 to 2016 were included. Each CPR event was classified as bradycardia with pulse, bradycardia with subsequent pulselessness, and initial pulseless cardiac arrest. We assessed risk-adjusted rates of survival to hospital discharge using multilevel Poisson regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 5592 pediatric patients were treated with CPR, of whom 2799 (50.1%) received CPR for bradycardia with poor perfusion and 2793 (49.9%) for initial pulseless cardiac arrest. Among those with bradycardia, 869 (31.0%, or 15.5% of cohort) became pulseless after a median of 3 minutes of CPR (interquartile range, 1-9 minutes). Rates of survival to discharge were 70.0% (1351 of 1930) for bradycardia with pulse, 30.1% (262 of 869) for bradycardia progressing to pulselessness, and 37.5% (1046 of 2793) for initial pulseless cardiac arrest (P for difference across groups <0.001). Children who became pulseless despite CPR for bradycardia had a 19% lower likelihood (risk ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.70, 0.93]; P=0.004) of surviving to hospital discharge than those who were initially pulseless. Among children who progressed to pulselessness despite CPR for bradycardia, a longer interval between CPR and pulselessness was a predictor of lower survival (reference, <2 minutes; for 2-5 minutes, risk ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.41-0.70]; for >5 minutes, risk ratio, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.32-0.53]). CONCLUSIONS: Among hospitalized children in whom CPR is initiated, half have bradycardia with poor perfusion at the initiation of chest compressions, and nearly one-third of these progress to pulseless in-hospital cardiac arrest despite CPR. Survival was significantly lower for children who progress to pulselessness despite CPR compared with those who were initially pulseless. These findings suggest that pediatric patients who lose their pulse despite resuscitation attempts are at particularly high risk and require a renewed focus on postresuscitation care.
Entities:
Keywords:
advanced cardiac life support; bradycardia; critical care; pediatrics; resuscitation
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Leon Chameides; Stephen M Schexnayder; Ricardo A Samson; Mary Fran Hazinski; Dianne L Atkins; Marc D Berg; Allan R de Caen; Ericka L Fink; Eugene B Freid; Robert W Hickey; Bradley S Marino; Vinay M Nadkarni; Lester T Proctor; Faiqa A Qureshi; Kennith Sartorelli; Alexis Topjian; Elise W van der Jagt; Arno L Zaritsky Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vinay M Nadkarni; Gregory Luke Larkin; Mary Ann Peberdy; Scott M Carey; William Kaye; Mary E Mancini; Graham Nichol; Tanya Lane-Truitt; Jerry Potts; Joseph P Ornato; Robert A Berg Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-01-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Laurie J Morrison; Robert W Neumar; Janice L Zimmerman; Mark S Link; L Kristin Newby; Paul W McMullan; Terry Vanden Hoek; Colleen C Halverson; Lynn Doering; Mary Ann Peberdy; Dana P Edelson Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ian Jacobs; Vinay Nadkarni; Jan Bahr; Robert A Berg; John E Billi; Leo Bossaert; Pascal Cassan; Ashraf Coovadia; Kate D'Este; Judith Finn; Henry Halperin; Anthony Handley; Johan Herlitz; Robert Hickey; Ahamed Idris; Walter Kloeck; Gregory Luke Larkin; Mary Elizabeth Mancini; Pip Mason; Gregory Mears; Koenraad Monsieurs; William Montgomery; Peter Morley; Graham Nichol; Jerry Nolan; Kazuo Okada; Jeffrey Perlman; Michael Shuster; Petter Andreas Steen; Fritz Sterz; James Tibballs; Sergio Timerman; Tanya Truitt; David Zideman Journal: Circulation Date: 2004-11-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Saket Girotra; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; John A Spertus; Yan Li; Harlan M Krumholz; Paul S Chan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mary Ann Peberdy; William Kaye; Joseph P Ornato; Gregory L Larkin; Vinay Nadkarni; Mary Elizabeth Mancini; Robert A Berg; Graham Nichol; Tanya Lane-Trultt Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2003-09 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Aaron Donoghue; Robert A Berg; Mary Fran Hazinski; Amy H Praestgaard; Kathryn Roberts; Vinay M Nadkarni Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-11-16 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mathias J Holmberg; Sebastian Wiberg; Catherine E Ross; Monica Kleinman; Anne Kirstine Hoeyer-Nielsen; Michael W Donnino; Lars W Andersen Journal: Circulation Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ian K Maconochie; Richard Aickin; Mary Fran Hazinski; Dianne L Atkins; Robert Bingham; Thomaz Bittencourt Couto; Anne-Marie Guerguerian; Vinay M Nadkarni; Kee-Chong Ng; Gabrielle A Nuthall; Gene Y K Ong; Amelia G Reis; Stephen M Schexnayder; Barnaby R Scholefield; Janice A Tijssen; Jerry P Nolan; Peter T Morley; Patrick Van de Voorde; Arno L Zaritsky; Allan R de Caen Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2020-10-21 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Sara C Handley; Molly Passarella; Tia T Raymond; Scott A Lorch; Anne Ades; Elizabeth E Foglia Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 6.251
Authors: Ryan W Morgan; Ron W Reeder; Kathleen L Meert; Russell Telford; Andrew R Yates; John T Berger; Kathryn Graham; William P Landis; Todd J Kilbaugh; Christopher J Newth; Joseph A Carcillo; Patrick S McQuillen; Rick E Harrison; Frank W Moler; Murray M Pollack; Todd C Carpenter; Daniel Notterman; Richard Holubkov; J Michael Dean; Vinay M Nadkarni; Robert A Berg; Robert M Sutton Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Ryan W Morgan; Matthew P Kirschen; Todd J Kilbaugh; Robert M Sutton; Alexis A Topjian Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2021-03-01 Impact factor: 16.193