Literature DB >> 31006059

The role of fuel type and combustion phase on the toxicity of biomass smoke following inhalation exposure in mice.

Yong Ho Kim1,2, Charly King1, Todd Krantz1, Marie M Hargrove3, Ingrid J George4, John McGee1, Lisa Copeland1, Michael D Hays4, Matthew S Landis5, Mark Higuchi1, Stephen H Gavett1, M Ian Gilmour6.   

Abstract

The characteristics of wildland fire smoke exposures which initiate or exacerbate cardiopulmonary conditions are unclear. We previously reported that, on a mass basis, lung toxicity associated with particulate matter (PM) from flaming smoke aspirated into mouse lungs is greater than smoldering PM. In this study, we developed a computer-controlled inhalation system which can precisely control complex biomass smoke emissions from different combustion conditions. This system was used to examine the toxicity of inhaled biomass smoke from peat, eucalyptus, and oak fuels generated under smoldering and flaming phases with emissions set to the same approximate concentration of carbon monoxide (CO) for each exposure (60-110 ppm), resulting in PM levels of ~ 4 mg/m3 for flaming and ~ 40 mg/m3 for smoldering conditions. Mice were exposed by inhalation 1 h/day for 2 days, and assessed for lung toxicity at 4 and 24 h after the final exposure. Peat (flaming and smoldering) and eucalyptus (smoldering) smoke elicited significant inflammation (neutrophil influx) in mouse lungs at 4 h with the peat (flaming) smoke causing even greater lung inflammation at 24-h post-exposure. A significant alteration in ventilatory timing was also observed in mice exposed to the peat (flaming) and eucalyptus (flaming and smoldering) smoke immediately after each day of exposure. No responses were seen for exposures to similar concentrations of flaming or smoldering oak smoke. The lung toxicity potencies (neutrophil influx per PM mass) agreed well between the inhalation and previously reported aspiration studies, demonstrating that although flaming smoke contains much less PM mass than smoldering smoke, it is more toxic on a mass basis than smoldering smoke exposure, and that fuel type is also a controlling factor.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomass smoke; Inhalation; Lung toxicity; Particulate matter; Wildland fire smoke

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31006059      PMCID: PMC6991149          DOI: 10.1007/s00204-019-02450-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Toxicol        ISSN: 0340-5761            Impact factor:   5.153


  26 in total

1.  Cold temperature and biodiesel fuel effects on speciated emissions of volatile organic compounds from diesel trucks.

Authors:  Ingrid J George; Michael D Hays; Richard Snow; James Faircloth; Barbara J George; Thomas Long; Richard W Baldauf
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Wildland fire smoke and human health.

Authors:  Wayne E Cascio
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  Measuring lung function in mice: the phenotyping uncertainty principle.

Authors:  Jason H T Bates; Charles G Irvin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2003-04

4.  Computational modeling of nanoscale and microscale particle deposition, retention and dosimetry in the mouse respiratory tract.

Authors:  B Asgharian; O T Price; M Oldham; Lung-Chi Chen; E L Saunders; T Gordon; V B Mikheev; K R Minard; J G Teeguarden
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.724

5.  Methodology for the measurement of mucociliary function in the mouse by scintigraphy.

Authors:  W M Foster; D M Walters; M Longphre; K Macri; L M Miller
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-03

Review 6.  Use of carbon monoxide as a therapeutic agent: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Roberta Foresti; Mohamed G Bani-Hani; Roberto Motterlini
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Inhaled carbon monoxide confers antiinflammatory effects against ventilator-induced lung injury.

Authors:  Tamás Dolinay; Mária Szilasi; Mingyao Liu; Augustine M K Choi
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Carbon monoxide pollution is associated with decreased lung function in asthmatic adults.

Authors:  C Canova; S Torresan; L Simonato; M L Scapellato; R Tessari; A Visentin; M Lotti; P Maestrelli
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 16.671

9.  Differential exposure and acute health impacts of inhaled solid-fuel emissions from rudimentary and advanced cookstoves in female CD-1 mice.

Authors:  Eugene A Gibbs-Flournoy; M Ian Gilmour; Mark Higuchi; James Jetter; Ingrid George; Lisa Copeland; Randy Harrison; Virginia C Moser; Janice A Dye
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.498

10.  Unrestrained plethysmography is an unreliable measure of airway responsiveness in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Andy Adler; Greg Cieslewicz; Charles G Irvin
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2004-03-19
View more
  13 in total

1.  Smoldering and flaming biomass wood smoke inhibit respiratory responses in mice.

Authors:  Marie McGee Hargrove; Yong Ho Kim; Charly King; Charles E Wood; M Ian Gilmour; Janice A Dye; Stephen H Gavett
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Physicochemical and toxicological properties of wood smoke particulate matter as a function of wood species and combustion condition.

Authors:  Dilpreet Singh; Dereje Damte Tassew; Jordan Nelson; Marie-Cecile G Chalbot; Ilias G Kavouras; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Philip Demokritou
Journal:  J Hazard Mater       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 14.224

3.  Zebrafish irritant responses to wildland fire-related biomass smoke are influenced by fuel type, combustion phase, and byproduct chemistry.

Authors:  W Kyle Martin; S Padilla; Y H Kim; D L Hunter; M D Hays; D M DeMarini; M S Hazari; M I Gilmour; A K Farraj
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2021-05-18

Review 4.  Ultrafine Particles from Residential Biomass Combustion: A Review on Experimental Data and Toxicological Response.

Authors:  Emanuela Corsini; Marina Marinovich; Roberta Vecchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 5.  Cardiovascular health impacts of wildfire smoke exposure.

Authors:  Hao Chen; James M Samet; Philip A Bromberg; Haiyan Tong
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 9.400

6.  Evaluation of small form factor, filter-based PM2.5 samplers for temporary non-regulatory monitoring during wildland fire smoke events.

Authors:  Jonathan Krug; Russell Long; Maribel Colón; Andrew Habel; Shawn Urbanski; Matthew S Landis
Journal:  Atmos Environ (1994)       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Differential Cardiopulmonary Health Impacts of Local and Long-Range Transport of Wildfire Smoke.

Authors:  Sheryl Magzamen; Ryan W Gan; Jingyang Liu; Katelyn O'Dell; Bonne Ford; Kevin Berg; Kirk Bol; Ander Wilson; Emily V Fischer; Jeffrey R Pierce
Journal:  Geohealth       Date:  2021-02-25

8.  Associations of wildfire smoke PM2.5 exposure with cardiorespiratory events in Colorado 2011-2014.

Authors:  Jennifer D Stowell; Guannan Geng; Eri Saikawa; Howard H Chang; Joshua Fu; Cheng-En Yang; Qingzhao Zhu; Yang Liu; Matthew J Strickland
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 9.621

9.  Mixtures modeling identifies chemical inducers versus repressors of toxicity associated with wildfire smoke.

Authors:  Julia E Rager; Jeliyah Clark; Lauren A Eaves; Vennela Avula; Nicole M Niehoff; Yong Ho Kim; Ilona Jaspers; M Ian Gilmour
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Peat smoke inhalation alters blood pressure, baroreflex sensitivity, and cardiac arrhythmia risk in rats.

Authors:  Brandi L Martin; Leslie C Thompson; Yong Ho Kim; Charly King; Samantha Snow; Mette Schladweiler; Najwa Haykal-Coates; Ingrid George; M Ian Gilmour; Urmila P Kodavanti; Mehdi S Hazari; Aimen K Farraj
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2020-10-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.