Literature DB >> 31005859

Predictive value of platelet reactivity unit (PRU) value for thrombotic and hemorrhagic events during flow diversion procedures: a meta-analysis.

Ebunoluwa Ajadi1, Shaowli Kabir2, Aaron Cook3, Stephen Grupke4, Abdulnasser Alhajeri5,4, Justin F Fraser5,6,4,7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Platelet function testing prior to flow diversion procedures, although initially heavily debated, has seen a substantial increase in its adoption to assess the risk of operative and perioperative thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. This meta-analysis was conducted to assess platelet function testing, particularly the VerifyNow Platelet Reactivity Unit (PRU) assay, for a relationship between the reported assay PRU value and thrombotic and hemorrhagic events.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The currently available literature (2013-2018) was surveyed with PubMed and Google Scholar searches. Included studies were those for which there were at least 30 cases during the study period, for which VerifyNow platelet reactivity unit values were obtained prior to the procedures and for which intraoperative and perioperative adverse events were noted. PRU value cut-offs ranging from >200 to >240 comprised the hyporesponse group while values ranging from <60 to <70 comprised the hyper-response group. The data were subject to statistical analysis to assess the relationship between PRU values and thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. The collected data were subsequently statistically analyzed to assess for publication bias.
RESULTS: The searches yielded 27 studies, of which 12 met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included data from 1464 reported Pipeline cases. The study included 273 men and 1177 women with a mean age across the analyzed procedures of 58 years (range 25-85). After loading with antiplatelet medications, preprocedural platelet hyper-responsiveness was associated with a greater incidence of hemorrhagic events with an increased absolute risk of 12%, but showed no relationship with thrombotic events. Preprocedural platelet hyporesponsiveness was associated with a greater incidence of thrombotic events with an absolute risk of 15%, but showed no relationship with hemorrhagic events.
CONCLUSIONS: VerifyNow PRU values that correspond to platelet hyporesponse or hyper-response to dual antiplatelet therapy are associated with a higher risk of thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, respectively. Thus, the PRU value may offer some predictive value for these events. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm; blood flow; device; flow diverter; stent

Year:  2019        PMID: 31005859     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-014765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  8 in total

1.  Factors associated with the new appearance of cerebral microbleeds after endovascular treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Authors:  Eiji Higashi; Taketo Hatano; Mitsushige Ando; Hideo Chihara; Takenori Ogura; Keita Suzuki; Keitaro Yamagami; Daisuke Kondo; Takahiko Kamata; Shota Sakai; Hiroki Sakamoto; Izumi Nagata
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Thrombogenicity of the p48 and anti-thrombogenic p48 hydrophilic polymer coating low-profile flow diverters in an in vitro human thrombin generation model.

Authors:  Pervinder Bhogal; Tim Lenz-Habijan; Catrin Bannewitz; Ralf Hannes; Hermann Monstadt; Martin Brodde; Beate Kehrel; Hans Henkes
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Cangrelor dose titration using platelet function testing during cerebrovascular stent placement.

Authors:  Pouya Entezami; Devin N Holden; Alan S Boulos; Alexandra R Paul; Nicholas C Field; Emad Nourollahzadeh; Junichi Yamamoto; John C Dalfino
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Prospective study to assess the tissue response to HPC-coated p48 flow diverter stents compared to uncoated devices in the rabbit carotid artery model.

Authors:  Tim Lenz-Habijan; Pervinder Bhogal; Catrin Bannewitz; Ralf Hannes; Hermann Monstadt; Andreas Simgen; Ruben Mühl-Benninghaus; Wolfgang Reith; Hans Henkes
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2019-12-05

5.  Distal migration of the flow-redirection endoluminal device immediately after treatment: A case report and literature review.

Authors:  Yasuhiko Nariai; Tomoji Takigawa; Akio Hyodo; Kensuke Suzuki
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2022-03-04

6.  Platelet reactivity after clopidogrel loading in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Yukiko Enomoto; Kenji Shoda; Daisuke Mizutani; Hirofumi Matsubara; Yusuke Egashira; Toru Iwama
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Thromboelastography (TEG) results are predictive of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diversion.

Authors:  Kainaat Javed; Santiago R Unda; Ryan Holland; Adisson Fortunel; Rose Fluss; Julio Inocencio; Neil Haranhalli; David Altschul
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 1.764

8.  Indirect Flow Diversion for Off-Centered Bifurcation Aneurysms and Distant Small-Vessel Aneurysms, a Retrospective Proof of Concept Study From Five Neurovascular Centers.

Authors:  Stefan Schob; Richard Brill; Eberhard Siebert; Massimo Sponza; Marie-Sophie Schüngel; Walter Alexander Wohlgemuth; Nico Götz; Dirk Mucha; Anil Gopinathan; Maximilian Scheer; Julian Prell; Georg Bohner; Vladimir Gavrilovic; Martin Skalej
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.