Literature DB >> 31005857

Novel clinical scores for occupational asthma due to exposure to high-molecular-weight agents.

Mahsa Taghiakbari1, Jacques-André Pralong2, Catherine Lemière1, Gregory Moullec1,3, Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri4, André Cartier1, Roberto Castano1, Eva Suarthana1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Specific inhalation challenge (SIC) as the reference diagnostic test for occupational asthma (OA) is not widely available worldwide. We aimed to develop non-SIC-based models for OA.
METHODS: Of 427 workers who were exposed to high-molecular-weight agents and referred to OA clinic at Montréal Sacré-Cœur Hospital between 1983 and 2016, we analysed 160 workers who completed non-specific bronchial hyper-responsiveness (NSBHR) tests and still worked 1 month before SIC. OA was defined as positive SIC. Logistic regression models were developed. The accuracy of the models was quantified using calibration and discrimination measures. Their internal validity was evaluated with bootstrapping procedures. The final models were translated into clinical scores and stratified into probability groups.
RESULTS: The final model, which included age ≤40 years, rhinoconjunctivitis, inhaled corticosteroid use, agent type, NSBHR, and work-specific sensitisation had a reasonable internal validity. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) was 0.91 (95% CI 0.86 to 0.95), statistically significantly higher than the combination of positive NSBHR and work-specific sensitisation (AUC=0.84). The top 70% of the clinical scores (ie, the high probability group) showed a significantly higher sensitivity (96.4%vs86.9%) and negative predictive value (93.6%vs84.1%) than the combination of positive NSBHR and work-specific sensitisation (p value <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: We developed novel scores for OA induced by high-molecular-weight agents with excellent discrimination. It could be helpful for secondary-care physicians who have access to pulmonary function test and allergy testing in identifying subjects at a high risk of having OA and in deciding on appropriate referral to a tertiary centre. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  asthma; clinical scores; diagnostic model; logistic regression; occupational sensitizers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31005857     DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  2 in total

1.  The validity of the Canadian clinical scores for occupational asthma in European populations.

Authors:  Eva Suarthana; Mahsa Taghiakbari; Paramita Saha-Chaudhuri; Catherine Rifflart; Hille Suojalehto; Pirjo Hölttä; Jolanta Walusiak-Skorupa; Marta Wiszniewska; Xavier Muñoz; Christian Romero-Mesones; Joaquín Sastre; Manuel J Rial; Paul K Henneberger; Olivier Vandenplas
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 2.  Prevention of baker's asthma.

Authors:  Mohamed F Jeebhay; Roslynn Baatjies
Journal:  Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2020-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.