Literature DB >> 31005520

Prognostic Implications of Blunted Feature-Tracking Global Longitudinal Strain During Vasodilator Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Stress Imaging.

Simone Romano1, Benjamin Romer2, Kaleigh Evans2, Michael Trybula2, Chetan Shenoy3, Raymond Y Kwong4, Afshin Farzaneh-Far5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic value of feature-tracking global longitudinal strain (GLS) measured during vasodilator stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have suggested that blunted myocardial strain during dobutamine stress echocardiography may be associated with adverse prognosis. Recent developments in CMR feature-tracking techniques now allow assessment of strain in clinical practice using standard cine images without specialized pulse sequences or complex post-processing. Whether feature-tracking GLS measured during vasodilator stress provides independent and incremental prognostic data is unclear.
METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing stress perfusion CMR were prospectively enrolled (n = 535). Feature-tracking stress GLS was measured immediately after regadenoson perfusion. Patients were followed for major adverse cardiac events (MACE): death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, heart failure hospitalization, sustained ventricular tachycardia, and late revascularization. Cox proportional hazards regression modeling was used to examine the association between stress GLS and MACE. The incremental prognostic value of stress GLS was assessed in nested models.
RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 1.5 years, 82 patients experienced MACE. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with stress GLS ≥ median (-19%) had significantly reduced event-free survival compared with those with stress GLS < median (log-rank p < 0.001). Stress GLS was significantly associated with risk of MACE after adjustment for clinical and imaging risk factors including ischemia, ejection fraction, and late gadolinium enhancement (hazard ratio: 1.267; p < 0.001). Addition of stress GLS into a model with clinical and imaging predictors resulted in significant increase in the C-index (from 0.80 to 0.85; p = 0.031) and a continuous net reclassification improvement of 0.898 (95% confidence interval: 0.565 to 1.124).
CONCLUSIONS: Feature-tracking stress GLS measured during vasodilator stress CMR is an independent predictor of MACE in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease, incremental to common clinical and imaging risk factors. These findings suggest a role for feature-tracking derived stress GLS in identifying patients at highest risk of adverse events following stress CMR.
Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; coronary artery disease; global longitudinal strain; prognosis; stress testing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31005520      PMCID: PMC6745296          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.03.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1876-7591


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Quantification of Structure-Function Relationships in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Kim-Lien Nguyen; Peng Hu; J Paul Finn
Journal:  Heart Fail Clin       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 3.179

Review 2.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging for structural heart disease.

Authors:  Yiling Situ; Samuel C M Birch; Camila Moreyra; Cameron J Holloway
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-04

3.  Feature-Tracking Global Longitudinal Strain Predicts Mortality in Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Simone Romano; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; John F Heitner; Dipan J Shah; Chetan Shenoy; Kaleigh Evans; Benjamin Romer; Pablo Salazar; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-11-11

Review 4.  The Potential of Oxygenation-Sensitive CMR in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hillier; Matthias G Friedrich
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2021-08-11

Review 5.  Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Authors:  Amit R Patel; Michael Salerno; Raymond Y Kwong; Amita Singh; Bobak Heydari; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 27.203

Review 6.  Cardiac MRI-Update 2020.

Authors:  Anke Busse; Rengarajan Rajagopal; Seyrani Yücel; Ebba Beller; Alper Öner; Felix Streckenbach; Daniel Cantré; Hüseyin Ince; Marc-André Weber; Felix G Meinel
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Prognostic Value of Feature-Tracking Right Ventricular Longitudinal Strain in Severe Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Simone Romano; Davide Dell'atti; Robert M Judd; Raymond J Kim; Jonathan W Weinsaft; Jiwon Kim; John F Heitner; Rebecca T Hahn; Afshin Farzaneh-Far
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-04-14

Review 8.  CMR for myocardial characterization in ischemic heart disease: state-of-the-art and future developments.

Authors:  Tilman Emrich; Moritz Halfmann; U Joseph Schoepf; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2021-03-25

9.  Prediction of cardiac events with non-contrast magnetic resonance feature tracking in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Daniel Overhoff; Uzair Ansari; Anna Hohneck; Erol Tülümen; Boris Rudic; Jürgen Kuschyk; Dirk Lossnitzer; Stefan Baumann; Matthias F Froelich; Stephan Waldeck; Ibrahim Akin; Martin Borggrefe; Stefan O Schoenberg; Theano Papavassiliu
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 10.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: the future is bright.

Authors:  Karthik Seetharam; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.