Literature DB >> 31005470

Long term outcome after minimally invasive and open Warshaw and Kimura techniques for spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: International multicenter retrospective study.

Salvatore Paiella1, Matteo De Pastena1, Maarten Korrel2, Teresa Lucia Pan1, Giovanni Butturini3, Chiara Nessi1, Riccardo De Robertis4, Luca Landoni1, Luca Casetti1, Alessandro Giardino3, Olivier Busch2, Antonio Pea1, Alessandro Esposito1, Marc Besselink2, Claudio Bassi1, Roberto Salvia5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Warshaw (WT) and the Kimura (KT) techniques are both used for open or minimally invasive (MI) spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP). Multicenter studies on long-term outcome of WT and KT are lacking.
METHODS: Multicenter retrospective study with transversal follow-up moment, including patients who underwent SPDP from 2000 to 2017 at three high-volume centers in Italy and the Netherlands. Primary endpoint was the incidence of short and long term complications. Patients without regular follow-up were interviewed about symptoms and complications.
RESULTS: In total, 164 patients were enrolled, 55 WT (33.5%) and 109 kT (66.5%), of which 95 (57.9%) MI. There was no 30-day mortality (0%).The only significant difference in short-term outcome was more delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after WT (9.1% vs 1.8%, p = 0.043). MI-SPDP was associated with less blood loss (median 150 vs 250 ml, respectively, p < 0.001), less DGE (0% vs 10%, p = 0.002), less abdominal abscesses (8.4% vs 18.4%, p = 0.03) and less splenic infarctions (3.2% vs. 13%, p = 0.042), than open SPDP. Long-term follow-up (median 41 months) was available for 111 patients (67.7%) of whom 18 (16.2%) had an SPDP-related long-term sequela, mostly perigastric varices (n = 11, 9%) but without differences between WT and KT. Less long-term sequelae were reported after MI as compared to open SPDP (12.5% vs 21.2%, p = 0.032).
CONCLUSIONS: In this international retrospective study, the WT and KT had comparable short- and long-term outcomes. If a KT does not seem feasible during SPDP, a WT is recommended, rather than performing a splenectomy. MI-SPDP was associated with less short- and long term complications as compared to an open SPDP.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Minimally invasive pancreatic resection; Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; Pancreatic resection; Parenchyma-sparing pancreatic resection; Spleen-preserving pancreatectomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31005470     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0748-7983            Impact factor:   4.424


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Evidence in minimally invasive surgery of the pancreas].

Authors:  Ekatarina Petrova; Charlotte Müller-Debus; Kim Honselmann; Ulrich Wellner; Tobias Keck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: the Verona experience.

Authors:  A Esposito; L Casetti; M De Pastena; M Ramera; G Montagnini; L Landoni; C Bassi; R Salvia
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-03-11

Review 3.  Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease: a review of techniques and results.

Authors:  Danilo Coco; Silvana Leanza; Riccardo Schillaci; Giuseppe Angelo Reina
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-10-01

Review 4.  The Role of Laparoscopic Surgery in Localized Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours.

Authors:  Valentina Ferraro; Michele Tedeschi; Letizia Laera; Michele Ammendola; Umberto Riccelli; Nicola Silvestris; Alba Fiorentino; Giammarco Surico; Riccardo Inchingolo; Francesco Decembrino; Nicola de Angelis; Riccardo Memeo
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2021-02-27

5.  Revisiting the potential advantage of robotic surgical system in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy over conventional laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Seok Jeong Yang; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Chang Moo Kang; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-03

6.  Minimally invasive vs open pancreatectomy for nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Juwan Kim; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-10-15

7.  Dynamic hematological changes in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Ming Cui; Jing-Kai Liu; Bang Zheng; Qiao-Fei Liu; Lu Zhang; Li Zhang; Jun-Chao Guo; Meng-Hua Dai; Tai-Ping Zhang; Quan Liao
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  401 consecutive minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies: lessons learned from 20 years of experience.

Authors:  Alessandro Esposito; Marco Ramera; Luca Casetti; Matteo De Pastena; Martina Fontana; Isabella Frigerio; Alessandro Giardino; Roberto Girelli; Luca Landoni; Giuseppe Malleo; Giovanni Marchegiani; Salvatore Paiella; Antonio Pea; Paolo Regi; Filippo Scopelliti; Massimiliano Tuveri; Claudio Bassi; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 3.453

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.