Literature DB >> 31005243

Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial.

Knut Taxbro1, Fredrik Hammarskjöld2, Bo Thelin3, Freddi Lewin3, Helga Hagman4, Håkan Hanberger5, Sören Berg6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Centrally inserted totally implanted vascular access ports (PORTs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are widely used for the administration of chemotherapy. Our aim was to study the incidence of catheter-related deep venous thrombosis in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy through either a PICC or a PORT.
METHODS: Adults with non-haematological cancer (mainly breast and colorectal) from two Swedish oncology centres were included and followed for up to 1 yr. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a single-lumen PICC or PORT. The primary end point was the occurrence of a clinically significant catheter-related deep venous thrombosis, and the secondary end point was a composite of adverse events related to the catheter: insertion complication, thrombosis, occlusion, infection, and mechanical problems.
RESULTS: The trial recruited 399 participants (PICC, n=201; PORT, n=198) between March 2013 and February 2017. The PICCs were associated with 16 (8%) deep venous thromboses compared with two (1%) in the PORT group (HR=10.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-44.6; P=0.002). The overall incidence of composite adverse events was higher for patients with a PICC compared with those with a PORT (HR=2.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-4.6; P<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: PICCs are associated with higher risk for catheter-related deep venous thrombosis and other adverse events when compared with PORTs. This increased risk should be considered when choosing a vascular access device for chemotherapy, especially in patients with solid malignancy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01971021.
Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  central venous catheter; central venous catheter thrombosis; peripherally inserted central catheter line insertion; vascular access devices

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31005243     DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.01.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  29 in total

1.  Safety of Insertion of Percutaneous Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgical Residents.

Authors:  Keisuke Obuchi; Ken Imaizumi; Hiroyuki Kasajima; Michihiro Kurushima; Minoru Umehara; Yousuke Tsuruga; Daisuke Yamana; Kentaro Sato; Aya Sato; Shinsaku Suzuki; Kazuaki Nakanishi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Application of continuous nursing intervention for patients with PICC catheterization undergoing tumor chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wei Zhu; Jin Liu; Hong Qian; Ying Wu; Chong-Ming Xu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

3.  Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC).

Authors:  Brent Burbridge; Hyun Lim; Lynn Dwernychuk; Ha Le; Tehmina Asif; Amer Sami; Shahid Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Comparison of PICC and TIVAP in chemotherapy for patients with thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Fangmei Qi; Hairong Cheng; Xiying Yuan; Li Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Perioperative and Postoperative Complications of Supraclavicular, Ultrasound-Guided, Totally Implantable Venous Access Port via the Brachiocephalic Vein in Adult Patients: A Retrospective Multicentre Study.

Authors:  Zepeng Yu; Xingwei Sun; Xuming Bai; Wei Ding; WeiDong Wang; Liang Xu; Wenming Qin; Ling Wen; Yong Jin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Correlation of Positive Blood Cultures with Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Line Infection in Oncology Patients.

Authors:  Christina Platanaki; Nicholas Zareifopoulos; Maria Lagadinou; Konstantinos Tsiotsios; Dimitrios Velissaris
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-22

7.  Utilization and Complications of Central Venous Access Devices in Oncology Patients.

Authors:  Narmeen Akhtar; Linda Lee
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  UK Vessel Health and Preservation (VHP) Framework: a commentary on the updated VHP 2020.

Authors:  Carole Hallam; Andrea Denton; Valya Weston; Helen Dunn; Tim Jackson; Susan Keeling; Steve Hill
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2020-12-14

9.  Development and Validation of a New Clinical Prediction Model of Catheter-Related Thrombosis Based on Vascular Ultrasound Diagnosis in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Binliang Liu; Junying Xie; Xiaoying Sun; Yanfeng Wang; Zhong Yuan; Xiyu Liu; Zhou Huang; Jiani Wang; Hongnan Mo; Zongbi Yi; Xiuwen Guan; Lixi Li; Wenna Wang; Hong Li; Fei Ma; Yixin Zeng
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2020-10-26

10.  Intraoperative ipsilateral subclavian port catheter implantation in resectable breast cancer patients: A novel, safe, and convenient clinical practice.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Yubo Liu; Ping Yu; Na Li; Yan Wang; Xiaoming Xie; Jun Tang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.