Literature DB >> 31005220

Increased distance from a treating proton center is associated with diminished ability to follow patients enrolled on a multicenter radiation oncology registry.

Miranda P Lawell1, Benjamin V M Bajaj1, Sara L Gallotto1, Clayton B Hess1, Brooke E Patteson2, Jessica A Nartowicz1, Megan J Giblin1, Ruth A Kleinerman3, Amy Berrington de Gonzalez3, David H Ebb4, Nancy J Tarbell1, Shannon M MacDonald1, Elizabeth A Weyman1, Torunn I Yock5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Consistent follow-up and data collection are necessary to identify long-term benefits/detriments of proton radiotherapy. Obtaining comprehensive clinical follow-up can be difficult and time-intensive for proton centers. Here we evaluate what factors affect maximum follow-up time among MGH Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR) participants. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enrollment in the PPCR was offered to any patient <22 years receiving protons. Patients were excluded from analysis if they were taken off study due to death or withdrawal. Distance from MGH was calculated by the great-circle formula. We utilized both univariate and multivariate analyses to determine risk factors associated with follow-up time.
RESULTS: 333 PPCR patients enrolled between 10/2012 and 03/2017 were included. Median follow-up was 2.4 years (<1-5.5), and median distance away from the proton center was 256.4 km (<1.6-16,949.6). Distance from MGH significantly predicted follow-up time: patients living outside the Boston Metropolitan Statistical Area, >121 km from the proton center, had average follow-up that was 0.53 years less compared to those living within 121 km (p = 0.0002). Loss in average follow-up was also associated with Medicaid insurance, treatment delay due to insurance, and non-White race. Those co-enrolled on a proton trial or seen at a facility had significantly increased follow-up by almost one year (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Patients living further from treating proton center have shorter follow-up durations. Increased distance from treating centers may adversely affect clinical outcomes research. Enhanced sharing of medical information among care providers and improved collection methods are needed to effectively evaluate the benefits of proton therapy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distance from treatment center; Follow-up; Pediatric oncology; Proton; Radiotherapy; Registry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31005220     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  3 in total

1.  An open invitation to join the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry to standardize data collection in pediatric radiation oncology.

Authors:  Miranda P Lawell; Daniel J Indelicato; Arnold C Paulino; William Hartsell; Nadia N Laack; Ralph P Ermoian; John P Perentesis; Ralph Vatner; Stephanie Perkins; Victor S Mangona; Christine E Hill-Kayser; Suzanne L Wolden; Young Kwok; John Han-Chih Chang; J Ben Wilkinson; Iain MacEwan; Andrew L Chang; Bree R Eaton; Matthew M Ladra; Sara L Gallotto; Elizabeth A Weyman; Benjamin V M Bajaj; Sujith Baliga; Beow Y Yeap; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Torunn I Yock
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Particle Therapy for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Roman O Kowalchuk; Kimberly S Corbin; Rachel B Jimenez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 3.  Heart Sparing Radiotherapy Techniques in Breast Cancer: A Focus on Deep Inspiration Breath Hold.

Authors:  Hayley B Stowe; Neal D Andruska; Francisco Reynoso; Maria Thomas; Carmen Bergom
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2022-07-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.