BACKGROUND: A novel "LUMIPOINT" software in the Rhythmia system (Boston Scientific) displays a histogram of activated area over the entire atrial tachycardia (AT) cycle length (CL) with a normalized score. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether the pattern of this global activation histogram (GAH) identified reentrant vs focal AT and whether a decrease in atrial activation area, shown as valleys in the GAH, identifies isthmuses. METHODS: One hundred eight activation maps of ATs (17 focal, 57 macroreentrant, 21 localized, 13 multiple loop) in 67 patients were reviewed retrospectively with the LUMIPOINT software. The ACTIVATION SEARCH feature highlighted the activated area in a given time period irrespective of the activation map. A 30-ms unit time interval was set, and the GAH patterns and electrophysiological properties of highlighted areas were examined. RESULTS: Focal ATs systematically displayed a plateau with GAH-Score <0.1 for at least 30% of the CL. Most reentrant ATs (90/91 [98.9%]) lacked this plateau and displayed activity covering the entire CL, with 2 [1-2] GAH-Valleys per tachycardia. Each GAH-Valley highlighted 1 [1-2] areas in the map. Among 264 highlighted areas, 198 (75.0%) represented slow conduction, 19 (7.2%) lines of block, 27 (10.2%) wavefront collision, 3 (1.1%) unknown, and 17 (6.4%) absence of activation in focal ATs. Practical ablation sites all matched one of the highlighted areas based on GAH-Valleys, and they corresponded better with areas highlighted by GAH-Score ≤0.2 (P <.0001). CONCLUSION: GAH shows focal vs reentrant mechanisms at first glance. Decrease in activated areas (displayed by GAH-Valleys) is mostly due to slow conduction and highlights areas of special interest, with 100% sensitivity for isthmus identification.
BACKGROUND: A novel "LUMIPOINT" software in the Rhythmia system (Boston Scientific) displays a histogram of activated area over the entire atrial tachycardia (AT) cycle length (CL) with a normalized score. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine whether the pattern of this global activation histogram (GAH) identified reentrant vs focal AT and whether a decrease in atrial activation area, shown as valleys in the GAH, identifies isthmuses. METHODS: One hundred eight activation maps of ATs (17 focal, 57 macroreentrant, 21 localized, 13 multiple loop) in 67 patients were reviewed retrospectively with the LUMIPOINT software. The ACTIVATION SEARCH feature highlighted the activated area in a given time period irrespective of the activation map. A 30-ms unit time interval was set, and the GAH patterns and electrophysiological properties of highlighted areas were examined. RESULTS: Focal ATs systematically displayed a plateau with GAH-Score <0.1 for at least 30% of the CL. Most reentrant ATs (90/91 [98.9%]) lacked this plateau and displayed activity covering the entire CL, with 2 [1-2] GAH-Valleys per tachycardia. Each GAH-Valley highlighted 1 [1-2] areas in the map. Among 264 highlighted areas, 198 (75.0%) represented slow conduction, 19 (7.2%) lines of block, 27 (10.2%) wavefront collision, 3 (1.1%) unknown, and 17 (6.4%) absence of activation in focal ATs. Practical ablation sites all matched one of the highlighted areas based on GAH-Valleys, and they corresponded better with areas highlighted by GAH-Score ≤0.2 (P <.0001). CONCLUSION:GAH shows focal vs reentrant mechanisms at first glance. Decrease in activated areas (displayed by GAH-Valleys) is mostly due to slow conduction and highlights areas of special interest, with 100% sensitivity for isthmus identification.