Literature DB >> 31004694

Neural correlates of egocentric and allocentric frames of reference combined with metric and non-metric spatial relations.

F Ruotolo1, G Ruggiero2, M Raemaekers3, T Iachini2, I J M van der Ham4, A Fracasso5, A Postma6.   

Abstract

Spatial relations (SRs: coordinate/metric vs categorical/non metric) and frames of reference (FoRs: egocentric/body vs allocentric/external element) represent the building blocks underlying any spatial representation. In the present 7-T fMRI study we have identified for the first time the neural correlates of the spatial representations emerging from the combination of the two dimensions. The direct comparison between the different spatial representations revealed a bilateral fronto-parietal network, mainly right sided, that was more involved in the egocentric categorical representations. A right fronto-parietal circuitry was specialized for egocentric coordinate representations. A bilateral occipital network was more involved in the allocentric categorical representations. Finally, a smaller part of this bilateral network (i.e. Calcarine Sulcus and Lingual Gyrus), along with the right Supramarginal and Inferior Frontal gyri, supported the allocentric coordinate representations. The fact that some areas were more involved in a spatial representation than in others reveals how our brain builds adaptive spatial representations in order to effectively react to specific environmental needs and task demands.
Copyright © 2019 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  7-T fMRI; frames of references; fronto-parietal network; occipital lobe; spatial relations

Year:  2019        PMID: 31004694     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  6 in total

1.  The use of egocentric and allocentric reference frames in static and dynamic conditions in humans.

Authors:  S Moraresku; K Vlcek
Journal:  Physiol Res       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 1.881

2.  Different Profiles of Spatial Navigation Deficits In Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker-Positive Versus Biomarker-Negative Older Adults With Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Martina Laczó; Lukas Martinkovic; Ondrej Lerch; Jan M Wiener; Jana Kalinova; Veronika Matuskova; Zuzana Nedelska; Martin Vyhnalek; Jakub Hort; Jan Laczó
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 5.702

3.  On the Dynamics of Spatial Updating.

Authors:  Jean Blouin; Jean-Philippe Pialasse; Laurence Mouchnino; Martin Simoneau
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  The thickness of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex predicts the prior-entry effect for allocentric representation in near space.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Aijun Wang; Xiaoyu Tang; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Confidence modulates the decodability of scene prediction during partially-observable maze exploration in humans.

Authors:  Wako Yoshida; Shin Ishii; Risa Katayama
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2022-04-19

Review 6.  Neuropsychology of posteromedial parietal cortex and conversion factors from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer's disease: systematic search and state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ciro Rosario Ilardi; Sergio Chieffi; Tina Iachini; Alessandro Iavarone
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.636

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.