| Literature DB >> 31004653 |
Gayathri Shivkumar1, Vaibhav Kshirsagar1, Tong Zhu1, Israel B Sebastiao1, Steven L Nail2, Gregory A Sacha2, Alina A Alexeenko3.
Abstract
The equipment capability curve is one of the bounding elements of the freeze-drying design space, and understanding it is critical to process design, transfer, and scale-up. The second bounding element of the design space is the product temperature limit beyond which the product collapses. The high cost associated with freeze-drying any product renders it crucial to operate using the most efficient cycle within the limits of the equipment and the product. In this work, we present a computational model to generate the equipment capability curve for 2 laboratory scale freeze-dryers and compare the results to experimentally generated equipment capability curves. The average deviations of the modeling results from the experiments for the 2 lyophilizers modeled are -4.8% and -7.2%. In addition, we investigate the effect of various numerical and geometric parameters on the simulated equipment capability. Among the numerical parameters, the chamber wall thermal boundary conditions exert the largest influence with a maximum value of 12.3%. Among the geometric parameters, the inclusion of the isolation valve reduces the equipment capability by 23.7%. Larger isolation valves, required for controlled nucleation technology, choke the flow in the duct at lower sublimation rates, thereby lowering the equipment capability limit.Keywords: freeze-drying; lyophilization; quality by design (QBD); thermodynamics; tunable diode laser absorption spectroscopy (TDLAS)
Year: 2019 PMID: 31004653 DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2019.04.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharm Sci ISSN: 0022-3549 Impact factor: 3.534