Respiratory tract infections due to community-acquired respiratory viruses including respiratory syncytial virus, Influenza, parainfluenza virus 3 and human metapneumovirus are detected in up to 40% of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients in whom they cause severe symptoms including pneumonia and bronchiolitis and can be fatal. Given the lack of effective antivirals and the data from our group demonstrating that adoptively transferred ex vivo-expanded virus-specific T cells can be clinically beneficial for the treatment of both latent (Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, BK virus, human herpesvirus 6) and lytic (adenovirus) viruses, we investigated the potential for extending this immunotherapeutic approach to respiratory viruses. We now describe a system that rapidly generates a single preparation of polyclonal (CD4+ and CD8+) virus-specific T cells reactive against 12 antigens derived from four viruses (respiratory syncytial virus, Influenza, parainfluenza virus 3 and human metapneumovirus) that commonly cause post-transplant morbidity and mortality. With a single in vitro stimulation we consistently generated Th1-polarized T-cell lines that produced multiple effector cytokines and were selectively reactive against viral-expressing targets, with no evidence of “off target” auto- or allo-reactivity. Finally, we demonstrated the clinical relevance of these virus-specific T cells by measuring responses in transplant recipients who successfully controlled active infections. These results support the clinical importance of T-cell immunity in mediating protective antiviral effects against community-acquired respiratory viruses and demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing a broad-spectrum immunotherapeutic in immunocompromised patients with uncontrolled infections.
Introduction
Acute upper and lower respiratory tract infections (RTI) due to community-acquired respiratory viruses (CARV) including respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, parainfluenza virus (PIV) and human metapneumovirus (hMPV) are a major public health problem.[1] For example, RSV-induced bronchiolitis is the most common reason for hospital admission in children under one year of age,[2]-[4] while the Center for Disease Control (CDC) estimates that, annually, Influenza accounts for up to 35.6 million illnesses worldwide, between 140,000 and 710,000 hospitalizations, annual costs of approximately $87.1 billion in disease management in the US alone, and between 12,000 and 56,000 deaths.Thus, CARV are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with individuals whose immune systems are naïve (e.g. young children) or compromised being the most vulnerable. For example, in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, the incidence of CARV-related respiratoryviral diseases is as high as 40%.[5] While most patients initially present with rhinorrhea, cough and fever, in approximately 50% of cases, infections progress to the lower respiratory tract and are characterized by severe symptoms including pneumonia and bronchiolitis and mortality rates of 23-50%.[6]-[9] There are neither approved preventative vaccines nor antiviral drugs for hMPV[10] and PIV[11] and for Influenza the preventative vaccine is not indicated unless patients are at least six months post-HSCT.[12] Aerosolized ribavirin (RBV) has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of RSV, but it is extremely costly (5-day course = $149,756) and logistically difficult to administer, requiring a specialized nebulization device that connects to an aerosol tent surrounding the patient.[13]-[16] Thus, the lack of approved antiviral agents for many clinically problematic CARV, and the high cost and complexity of administering aerosolized RBV, underscores the need for alternative treatment strategies.Our group has previously demonstrated that the adoptive transfer of in vitro-expanded virus-specific T cells (VST) can safely and effectively prevent and treat infections associated with both latent [Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), BK virus (BKV), human her-pesvirus 6 (HHV6)] and lytic [adenovirus (AdV)] viruses in allogeneic HSCT recipients.[17,18] Given that susceptibility to CARV is associated with underlying cellular immune deficiency,[1,5,6] in the current study, we explored the feasibility of extending the therapeutic range of VST therapy to include Influenza, RSV, hMPV and PIV-3.We here describe a mechanism by which we can rapidly generate a single preparation of polyclonal (CD4+ and CD8+) VST with specificity for 12 immunodominant antigens derived from our four target viruses using Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)-compliant manufacturing methodologies. The viral proteins used for stimulation were chosen on the basis of both their immunogenicity to T cells and their sequence conservation.[19]-[21] The expanded cells are Th1-polarized, polyfunctional and selectively able to react to and kill, viral antigen-expressing target cells with no activity against non-infected autologous or allogeneic targets, attesting to both their selectivity for viral targets and their safety for clinical use. We anticipate such multi-respiratory virus-targeted cells (multi-R-VST) will provide broad spectrum benefit to immunocompromised individuals with uncontrolled CARV infections.
Methods
Donors and cell lines
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from healthy volunteers and HSCT recipients with informed consent using Baylor College of Medicine institutional review board-approved protocols (H-7634, H-7666) and were used to generate phytohemagglutinin (PHA) blasts and multi-R-VST. PHA blasts were generated as previously reported[20] and cultured in VST medium [45% RPMI 1640 (HyClone Laboratories, Logan, UT, USA), 45% Click’s medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA, USA), 2 mM GlutaMAX TM-I (Life Technologies, Grand Island, New York, NY, USA), and 10% human AB serum (Valley Biomedical, Winchester, VA, USA)] supplemented with interleukin 2 (IL2) (100 U/mL; NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA), which was replenished every two days.
Multi-respiratory virus-targeted cell generation
Pepmixes
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with peptide libraries (15mers overlapping by 11aa) spanning Influenza A (NP1, MP1), RSV (N, F), hMPV (F, N, M2-1, M) (JPT Peptide Technologies, Berlin, Germany) and PIV-3 antigens (M, HN, N, F) (Genemed Synthesis, San Antonio, TX, USA). Lyophilized pep-mixes were reconstituted in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich) and stored at -80°C.
Generation of virus-specific T cells
To generate multi-R-VST, PBMC (2.5x107) were transferred to a G-Rex10 (Wilson Wolf Manufacturing Corporation, St. Paul, MN, USA) with 100 mL of VST medium supplemented with IL7 (20 ng/mL), IL4 (800 U/mL) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and pepmixes (2 ng/peptide/mL) and cultured for 10-13 days at 37°C, 5% CO2.
Flow cytometry
Immunophenotyping
Multi-R-VST were surface-stained with monoclonal antibodies to: CD3, CD25, CD28, CD45RO, CD279 (PD-1) [Becton Dickinson (BD), Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA], CD4, CD8, CD16, CD62L, CD69 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and CD366 (TIM-3) (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were acquired on a Gallios™ Flow Cytometer and analyzed with Kaluza® Flow Analysis Software (Beckman Coulter). See Online Supplementary Appendix for details.
FoxP3 staining was performed using the eBioscience FoxP3 kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), per manufacturers’ instructions and as detailed in the Online Supplementary Appendix.
The multi-R-VST cytokine profile was evaluated using the MIL-LIPLEX High Sensitivity Human Cytokine Panel (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), per manufacturer’s instructions (see the Online Supplementary Appendix).
Chromium release assay
A standard 4-hour chromium (Cr51) release assay was used to measure the specific cytolytic activity of multi-R-VST with autologous antigen-loaded PHA blasts as targets (20 ng/pep-mix/1x106 target cells). Effector:Target (E:T) ratios of 40:1, 20:1, 10:1, and 5:1 were used to analyze specific lysis. The percentage of specific lysis was calculated [(experimental release -spontaneous release)/(maximum release - spontaneous release)] x 100. In order to measure the autoreactive and alloreactive potential of multi-R-VST lines, autologous and allogeneic PHA blasts alone were used as targets.
Results
Generation of polyclonal multi-respiratory virus-targeted cells from healthy donors
To investigate the feasibility of generating VST-specific T-cell lines containing sub-populations of cells reactive against Influenza, RSV, hMPV, and PIV-3 we utilized a pool of overlapping peptide libraries spanning immunogenic antigens from each of the target viruses (Influenza – NP1 and MP1; RSV – N and F; hMPV – F, N, M2-1 and M; PIV-3 – M, HN, N and F) to stimulate PBMC before culture in a G-Rex10 in cytokine-supplemented VST medium (Figure 1A). Over 10-13 days we achieved an average 8.5-fold increase in cells (Figure 1B) [increase from 0.25x107 PBMC/cm2 to mean 1.9±0.2x107 cells/cm2 (median: 2.05x107, range: 0.6-2.82x107 cells/cm2; n=12)], which were comprised almost exclusively of CD3+ T cells (96.2±0.6%; mean±SEM), with a mixture of cytotoxic (CD8+; 18.1±1.3%) and helper (CD4+ ; 74.4±1.7%) T cells (Figure 1C), with no evidence of regulatory T-cell outgrowth, as assessed by CD4/CD25/FoxP3+ staining (Online Supplementary Figure S1). Furthermore, the expanded cells displayed a phenotype consistent with effector function and long-term memory as evidenced by upregulation of the activation markers CD25 (50.2±3.8%), CD69 (52.8±6.3%), CD28 (85.8±2%) as well as expression of central (CD45RO+/CD62L+: 61.4±3%) and effector memory markers (CD45RO+/CD62L−: 20.3±2.3%), with minimal PD1 (6.9±1.4%) or Tim3 (13.5±2.3%) surface expression (Figure 1C and D).
Figure 1
Generation of polyclonal multi-respiratory virus-targeted cells (multi-R-VST) from healthy donors. (A) A schematic representation of the multi-R-VST generation protocol. (B) Fold expansion achieved over a 10-13 day period based on cell counting using trypan blue exclusion (n=12). (C and D) Phenotype of the expanded cells (mean±Standard Error of Mean, n=12) (SEM).
Generation of polyclonal multi-respiratory virus-targeted cells (multi-R-VST) from healthy donors. (A) A schematic representation of the multi-R-VST generation protocol. (B) Fold expansion achieved over a 10-13 day period based on cell counting using trypan blue exclusion (n=12). (C and D) Phenotype of the expanded cells (mean±Standard Error of Mean, n=12) (SEM).
Anti-viral specificity of multi-respiratory virus-targeted cells
Multi-respiratory virus-targeted cells are cytolytic and kill virus-loaded targets
To investigate the cytolytic potential of these expanded cells in vitro, we co-cultured multi-R-VST with autologous Cr51-labeled PHA blasts, which were loaded with viral pepmixes with unloaded PHA blasts serving as a control. Viral antigen-loaded targets were specifically recognized and lysed by our expanded multi-R-VST (40:1 E:T -Influenza: 13±5%, RSV: 36±8%, hMPV: 26±7%, PIV-3: 22±5%, n=8) (Figure 4A and Online Supplementary Figure S6). Finally, even though these VST had received only a single stimulation, there was no evidence of activity against non-infected autologous targets nor of alloreactivity (graft-versus-host potential) using HLA-mismatched PHA blasts as targets (Figure 4B), an important consideration if these cells are to be administered to allogeneic HSCT recipients.
Figure 4.
Multi-respiratory virus-targeted cells (multi-R-VST) are exclusively reactive against virus-infected targets. (A) Cytolytic potential of multi-R-VST evaluated by standard 4-hour Cr51 release assay using autologous pepmix-pulsed PHA blasts as targets (E:T 40:1; n=8) with unloaded phytohemagglutinin (PHA) blasts as a control. Results are presented as percentage of specific lysis (mean±SEM). (B) Demonstration that multi-R-VST show no activity against either non-infected autologous or allogeneic PHA blasts, as assessed by Cr51 release assay.
Multi-respiratory virus-targeted cells (multi-R-VST) are exclusively reactive against virus-infected targets. (A) Cytolytic potential of multi-R-VST evaluated by standard 4-hour Cr51 release assay using autologous pepmix-pulsed PHA blasts as targets (E:T 40:1; n=8) with unloaded phytohemagglutinin (PHA) blasts as a control. Results are presented as percentage of specific lysis (mean±SEM). (B) Demonstration that multi-R-VST show no activity against either non-infected autologous or allogeneic PHA blasts, as assessed by Cr51 release assay.
Detection of CARV-specific T cells in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients
Finally, to assess the potential clinical relevance of multi-R-VST we investigated whether allogeneic HSCT recipients with active/recent CARV infections exhibited elevated levels of reactive T cells during/following an active viral episode. Figure 5A shows the results of Patient #1, a 64-year old male with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received a matched related donor (MRD) transplant with reduced intensity conditioning. The patient developed a severe upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) nine months post-HSCT that was confirmed to be RSV-related by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis. He was not on any immunosuppression at the time of infection but was placed on prednisone the day of infection diagnosis to control pulmonary inflammation. Within four weeks his symptoms resolved without specific antiviral treatment. To assess whether T-cell immunity contributed to viral clearance, we analyzed the circulating frequency of RSV-specific T cells over the course of his infection. Immediately prior to infection this patient exhibited a very weak response to the RSV antigens N and F (6.5 SFC/5x105 PBMC). However, within a month of viral exposure, RSV-specific T cells had expanded in vivo (527 SFC/5x105 PBMC), representing an 81-fold increase in reactive cells (Figure 5A) which declined thereafter, coincident with viral clearance. Of note, the observed RSV-specific responses did not follow the overall increase in lymphocyte/CD4+ counts, thus indicating that T-cell expansion was virus-driven and not due to general immune reconstitution. Similarly, Patient #2, a 23-year old male with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who received a matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplant with myeloablative conditioning, and developed a severe RSV-related URTI five months post HSCT while on tapering doses of tacrolimus. His infection symptomatically resolved within one week, coincident with the administration of ribavirin. To investigate whether endogenous immunity also played a role in viral clearance we monitored reactive T-cell numbers over time. Viral clearance was accompanied by an increase in the circulating frequency of RSV-specific T cells (peak 93 SFC/5x105 PBMC) with subsequent return to baseline levels (Figure 5B). The same patient was hospitalized seven months post transplant for a subsequent pneumococcal pneumonia with concurrent detection (by PCR) of hMPV in sputum. His pneumonia was treated with antibiotics with subsequent resolution of disease and viral clearance, coincident with a marked expansion of hMPV-specific T cells (reactive against F, N, M2-1 and M), which increased from 4 SFC to a peak of 70 SFC and subsequent decline to baseline levels (Figure 5C). Again, the observed RSV-and hMPV-specific responses were independent of the overall increase in lymphocyte/CD4+ counts.
In the present study, we explored the feasibility of targeting multiple clinically problematic respiratory viruses using ex vivo expanded T cells. We have now shown that we can rapidly generate polyclonal, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with specificities directed to a total of 12 antigens derived from four seasonal CARV [Influenza, RSV, hMPV and PIV-3] that are responsible for upper and lower respiratory tract infections in the immunocompromised host. These broad spectrum VST, generated using GMP-compliant methodologies, were Th1-polarized, produced multiple effector cytokines upon stimulation, and killed virus-infected targets without auto- or allo-reactivity. Finally, the detection of reactive T-cell populations in the peripheral blood of allogeneic HSCT recipients who successfully cleared active CARV infections suggests the potential for clinical benefit following the adoptive transfer of such multi-R-VST.Community-acquired respiratory virus-associated acute upper and lower RTI are a major public health problem with young children, the elderly and those with suppressed or compromised immune systems being the most vulnerable.[1]-[3] These infections are associated with symptoms including cough, dyspnea, and wheezing, and dual/multiple co-existing infections are common, with frequencies that may exceed 40% among children under 5-years of age and are associated with increased risk of morbidity and hospitalization.[22]-[26] Among immunocompromised allogeneic HSCT recipients up to 40% experience CARV infections that can range from mild (associated symptoms including rhinorrhea, cough and fever) to severe (bronchiolitis and pneumonia) with associated mortality rates as high as 50% in those with LRTI.[5]-[9] The therapeutic options are limited. For hMPV and PIV-3, there are currently no approved preventative vaccines nor therapeutic antiviral drugs, while the off-label use of the nucleoside analog RBV and the investigational use of DAS-181 (a recombinant sialidase fusion protein) have had limited clinical impact.[10,11,27,28] The preventative annual Influenza vaccine is not recommended for allogeneic HSCT recipients until at least six months post transplant (and excluded in recipients of intensive chemotherapy or anti-B-cell antibodies), while neuraminidase inhibitors are not always effective for the treatment of active infections.[12] For RSV, aerosolized RBV is FDA-approved for the treatment of severe bronchiolitis in infants and children, and it is also used off-label for the prevention of upper or lower RTI and treatment of RSVpneumonia in HSCT recipients.[13,15,16] However, its widespread use is limited by the cumbersome nebulization device and ventilation system required for drug delivery, as well as the considerable associated cost. For example, in 2015, aerosolized RBV cost $29,953 per day, with five days representing a typical treatment course.[14] Thus, the lack of approved treatments combined with the high cost of antiviral agents led us to explore the potential for using adoptively-transferred T cells to prevent and/or treat CARV infections in this patient population.The pivotal role of functional T-cell immunity in mediating viral control of CARV has only recently attracted attention. For example, a retrospective study of 181 HSCT patients with RSVURTI, reported lymphopenia (defined as ALC ≤100/mm3) as a key determinant in identifying patients whose infections would progress to LRTI, while RSV neutralizing antibody levels were not significantly associated with disease progression.[29] Furthermore, in a recent retrospective analysis of 154 adult patients with hematologic malignancies with or without HSCT treated for RSV LRTI, lymphopenia was significantly associated with higher mortality rates.[30] Both of these studies are suggestive of the importance of cellular immunity in mediating protective immunity in vivo.Our group has previously demonstrated the feasibility and clinical utility of ex vivo-expanded VST to treat a range of clinically problematic viruses including the latent viruses CMV, EBV, BKV, HHV-6 and AdV.[17,31]-[33] Our initial studies (and those of others)[34]-[37] explored the safety and activity of donor-derived T-cell lines, but more recently we have developed an “off the shelf” universal T-cell platform whereby VST specific for all five viruses (CMV, EBV, BKV, HHV-6, AdV) were prospectively generated and banked, thus ensuring their immediate availability for administration to immunocompromised patients with uncontrolled infections. Indeed, in our recent phase II clinical trial, we administered these partially HLA-matched VST to 38 patients with a total of 45 infections that had proven refractory to conventional antiviral agents and achieved an overall response rate of 92%, with no significant toxicity.[18] This precedent of clinical success using adoptively transferred T cells, as well as the absence of effective therapies for a range of CARV, prompted us to explore the potential for extending the therapeutic scope of VST therapy to Influenza, RSV, hMPV and PIV-3 infections post HSCT. In this context, one could consider the option of prophylactic VST administration seasonally to high-risk patients [e.g. young (<5 years) and elderly adults, patients with impaired immune systems]. Alternatively, these cells could be used therapeutically in patients with URTI who have failed conventional antiviral medications in order to prevent LRT progression.Thus, using our established, GMP-compliant VST manufacturing methodology, we demonstrated the feasibility of generating VST reactive against a spectrum of CARV-derived antigens chosen on the basis of both their immunogenicity to T cells and their sequence conservation [Influenza – NP1 and MP1;[20,38,39] RSV – N and F;[15,16,20] hMPV – F, N, M2-1 and M;[21] PIV3 – M, HN, N and F[19]] from 12 donors with diverse haplotypes. The expanded cells were polyclonal (CD4+ and CD8+), Th1-polarized and polyfunctional, and were able to lyse viral antigen-expressing targets while sparing non-infected autologous or allogeneic targets, attesting to both their virus specificity and their safety for clinical use. Finally, to assess the clinical significance of these findings we examined the peripheral blood of five allogeneic HSCT recipients with active RSV, hMPV and PIV-3 infections. Four of these patients successfully controlled the viruses within 1-5 weeks, coincident with an amplification of endogenous reactive T cells and subsequent return to baseline levels upon viral clearance, while one patient failed to mount an immune response against the infecting virus and has equally failed to clear the infection to date. These data suggests that the adoptive transfer of ex vivo-expanded cells should be clinically beneficial in patients whose own cellular immunity is lacking.In conclusion, we have shown that it is feasible to rapidly generate a single preparation of polyclonal multi-respiratory (multi-R)-VST with specificities directed to Influenza, RSV, hMPV and PIV-3 in clinically relevant numbers using GMP-compliant manufacturing method ologies. These data provide the rationale for a future clinical trial of adoptively transferred multi-R-VST for the prevention or treatment of CARV infections in immunocom-promised patients.
Authors: Faye Janice Lim; Nicholas de Klerk; Christopher C Blyth; Parveen Fathima; Hannah C Moore Journal: Respirology Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 6.424
Authors: Judith Feucht; Kathrin Opherk; Peter Lang; Simone Kayser; Lena Hartl; Wolfgang Bethge; Susanne Matthes-Martin; Peter Bader; Michael H Albert; Britta Maecker-Kolhoff; Johann Greil; Hermann Einsele; Paul-Gerhardt Schlegel; Friedhelm R Schuster; Bernhard Kremens; Claudia Rossig; Bernd Gruhn; Rupert Handgretinger; Tobias Feuchtinger Journal: Blood Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Tobias Feuchtinger; Kathrin Opherk; Wolfgang A Bethge; Max S Topp; Friedhelm R Schuster; Eva M Weissinger; Mohamad Mohty; Reuven Or; Michael Maschan; Michael Schumm; Klaus Hamprecht; Rupert Handgretinger; Peter Lang; Hermann Einsele Journal: Blood Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Karl S Peggs; Stephanie Verfuerth; Arnold Pizzey; Shoon-Ling C Chow; Kirsty Thomson; Stephen Mackinnon Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Ifigeneia Tzannou; Anastasia Papadopoulou; Swati Naik; Kathryn Leung; Caridad A Martinez; Carlos A Ramos; George Carrum; Ghadir Sasa; Premal Lulla; Ayumi Watanabe; Manik Kuvalekar; Adrian P Gee; Meng-Fen Wu; Hao Liu; Bambi J Grilley; Robert A Krance; Stephen Gottschalk; Malcolm K Brenner; Cliona M Rooney; Helen E Heslop; Ann M Leen; Bilal Omer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-08-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Harish Nair; Eric Af Simões; Igor Rudan; Bradford D Gessner; Eduardo Azziz-Baumgartner; Jian Shayne F Zhang; Daniel R Feikin; Grant A Mackenzie; Jennifer C Moiïsi; Anna Roca; Henry C Baggett; Syed Ma Zaman; Rosalyn J Singleton; Marilla G Lucero; Aruna Chandran; Angela Gentile; Cheryl Cohen; Anand Krishnan; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Adriano Arguedas; Alexey Wilfrido Clara; Ana Lucia Andrade; Maurice Ope; Raúl Oscar Ruvinsky; María Hortal; John P McCracken; Shabir A Madhi; Nigel Bruce; Shamim A Qazi; Saul S Morris; Shams El Arifeen; Martin W Weber; J Anthony G Scott; W Abdullah Brooks; Robert F Breiman; Harry Campbell Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Amy B Hont; Allison B Powell; Danielle K Sohai; Izabella K Valdez; Maja Stanojevic; Ashley E Geiger; Kajal Chaudhary; Ehsan Dowlati; Catherine M Bollard; Conrad Russell Y Cruz Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 12.910
Authors: Scheilla T Strumillo; Denis Kartavykh; Fábio F de Carvalho; Nicolly C Cruz; Ana C de Souza Teodoro; Ricardo Sobhie Diaz; Marli F Curcio Journal: Cell Biol Int Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 4.473