| Literature DB >> 31003754 |
Tony Lin-Wei Chen1, Cristine E Agresta2, David B Lipps3, Seraphina G Provenzano2, Jocelyn F Hafer2, Duo Wai-Chi Wong4, Ming Zhang5, Ronald F Zernicke6.
Abstract
Forefoot strike is increasingly being adopted by runners because it can better attenuate impact than rearfoot strike. However, forefoot strike may overload the plantar fascia and alter the plantar fascia elasticity. This study aimed to use ultrasound elastography to investigate and compare shear wave elasticity of the plantar fascia between rearfoot strikers and forefoot strikers. A total of 35 participants (21 rearfoot strikers and 14 forefoot strikers), who were free of lower limb injuries and diseases, were recruited from a local running club. Individual foot strike patterns were identified through the measured plantar pressure during treadmill running. The B-Mode ultrasound images and shear wave elastographic images of the plantar fascia were collected from each runner. Two independent investigators reviewed the images and examined the plantar fascia qualitatively and quantitatively. The results demonstrated an overall good agreement between the investigators in the image review outcomes (ICC:0.96-0.98, κ: 0.89). There were no significant differences in the fascial thickness (p = 0.50) and hypoechogenicity on the gray-scale images (p = 0.54) between the two groups. Shear wave elastography showed that forefoot strikers exhibited reduced plantar fascia elasticity compared to rearfoot strikers (p = 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.91). A less elastic fascial tissue was more easily strained under loading. Tissue overstrain is frequently related to the incidence of plantar fasciitis. While further study is needed for firm conclusions, runners using forefoot strike were encouraged to enhance their foot strength for better protection of the plantar fascia.Entities:
Keywords: Foot strike patterns; Plantar fascia; Running; Shear wave elastography
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31003754 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.04.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Biomech ISSN: 0021-9290 Impact factor: 2.712