| Literature DB >> 31003549 |
Brian Dillon1, Patrick Doran2, Evert Fuenmayor3, Andrew V Healy4, Noel M Gately5, Ian Major6, John G Lyons7.
Abstract
Biodegradable polymers play a crucial role in the medical device field, with a broad range of applications such as suturing, drug delivery, tissue engineering, scaffolding, orthopaedics, and fixation devices. Poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) is one of the most commonly used and investigated biodegradable polymers. The objective of this study was to determine the influence low shear microbore extrusion exerts on the properties of high molecular weight PLLA for medical tubing applications. Results showed that even at low shear rates there was a considerable reduction in molecular weight (Mn = 7-18%) during processing, with a further loss (Mn 11%) associated with resin drying. An increase in melt residence time from ~4 mins to ~6 mins, translated into a 12% greater reduction in molecular weight. The degradation mechanism was determined to be thermal and resulted in a ~22-fold increase in residual monomer. The differences in molecular weight between both batches had no effect on the materials thermal or morphological properties. However, it did affect its mechanical properties, with a significant impact on tensile strength and modulus. Interestingly there was no effect on the elongational proprieties of the tubing. There was also an observed temperature-dependence of mechanical properties below the glass transition temperature.Entities:
Keywords: Bioabsorbable polymers; crystallinity; low shear; microbore extrusion; molecular weight; poly-l-lactic acid; residence time; residual monomer
Year: 2019 PMID: 31003549 PMCID: PMC6523984 DOI: 10.3390/polym11040710
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1(a) Molecular structure of lactic acid, (b) Chemical structure of l-(+)-lactic acid.
Figure 2Extrusion Screw Schematic.
Extrusion screw geometry details for both the 0.75” and 1” screws.
| Screw Dia. | Feed Depth | Metering Depth | Compression Ratio | Feed Section | Compression Section | Metering Section | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.75” | 0.150 | 0.050” | 3:1 | 24/1 | 8 Flights | 8 Flights | 8 Flights |
| 1“ | 0.144 | 0.046” | 3.1:1 | 24/1 | 8 Flights | 8 Flights | 8 Flights |
Figure 3Schematic of tube extrusion process including an extruder and down-stream ancillary equipment.
Figure 4Capillary rheology curve of apparent shear viscosity vs. apparent shear rate.
GPC results of the PLLA resin (as received and dried) and extrusion Batches A and B.
| Sample Reference | Mn (g/mol) | Mw (g/mol) | PDI |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLLA Resin - as received | 200,073 | 430,409 | 2.16 |
| PLLA Resin - dried | 177,662 | 419,715 | 2.36 |
| Extruded Batch A | 146,177 | 367,575 | 2.51 |
| Extruded Batch B | 165,472 | 413,439 | 2.50 |
Figure 5Hydrolytic degradation of PLLA, reproduced from [28] under open access license.
Figure 6FTIR Spectra of dried resin (blue) and Batch A extruded tubing (red) in the wavelength range of 4000–500 cm−1.
Figure 7FTIR Spectra of dried resin (blue) and Batch A extruded tubing (red) in the wavelength range of 1250–800 cm−1.
GC-FID results presenting the lactide weight percentage of the PLLA resin (dried) and extrusion Batches A and B.
| Sample Reference | Lactide wt.% |
|---|---|
| PLLA Resin - dried | 0.016 |
| Extruded Batch A | 0.366 |
| Extruded Batch B | 0.330 |
Figure 8DSC curve overlay of PLLA resin and extruded Batch A & B plots. Abbreviations: Tg: glass transition temperature; Tcc: cold crystallisation; ΔHc: enthalpy of cold crystallisation; Tmc: melt recrystallisation; Tm: melt temperature; ΔHm: enthalpy of melting; Xc: degree of crystallinity.
Summary of thermal properties of dried PLLA dried resin and Batch A and B extruded tubing.
| Batch Reference | Tg (°C) | ΔCp J/(g°C) | Tcc (°C) | ΔHc (J/g) | Tmc (°C) | Tm (°C) | ΔHm (J/g) | Xc (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resin – Dried | 60.7 | 0.49 | - | - | - | 171.0 | 34.5 | 37.1 |
| Extruded Batch A | 61.4 | 0.95 | 100.9 | 27.6 | 159.9 | 180.6 | 39.8 | 13.2 |
| Extruded Batch B | 61.6 | 0.62 | 97.7 | 27.4 | 159.4 | 181.5 | 40.2 | 13.8 |
Figure 9Representative tensile stress/strain curve from Batch A and B extruded tubing.
Summary of tensile properties of Batch A and B extruded tubing.
| Batch Reference | Young’s Modulus (MPa) | Maximum Tensile Stress (MPa) | Strain at Maximum Load (%) | Strain at Break (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extrusion Batch A |
| 2408 | 66.6 | 4.47 | 5.54 |
| Extrusion Batch B |
| 2521 | 70.5 | 4.44 | 5.38 |
Figure 10DMA plot of storage moduli from Batch A and B extruded tubes.
DMA Storage Moduli at different temperatures for batch A and B extruded tubing.
| Batch Reference | Storage Modulus (MPa) @ 21 °C | Storage Modulus (MPa) @ 37 °C | Storage Modulus (MPa) @ 50 °C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Extrusion Batch A | 2067 | 1984 | 1831 |
| Extrusion Batch B | 2541 | 2460 | 2321 |