| Literature DB >> 31003418 |
Jing Li1, Qijun Yu2, Haoliang Huang3, Suhong Yin4.
Abstract
The effects of Ca/Si ratio, aluminum and magnesium on the carbonation behavior of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) were investigated by using X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA). The results showed that the Ca/Si ratio, Al/Si ratio and Mg/Si ratio had a significant influence on the structure, carbonation products and carbonation resistance of C-(M)-(A)-S-H. The mean chain length of silicate chains in C-S-H increased as the Ca/Si ratio decreased. Aluminum uptake in C-S-H increased the content of bridging silicate tetrahedron (Q2). A cross-linked structure (Q3) appeared when magnesium uptake in C-S-H. The carbonation product of C-S-H was vaterite if the Ca/Si ratio was lower than 0.87. The carbonation products of C-S-H were vaterite and calcite if the Ca/Si ratio was higher than 1.02. C-M-S-H had more polymerized units, stronger bond strength and better carbonation resistance than C-S-H.Entities:
Keywords: Al/Si ratio; C-S-H; Ca/Si ratio; Mg/Si ratio; carbonation behavior
Year: 2019 PMID: 31003418 PMCID: PMC6514930 DOI: 10.3390/ma12081268
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
The detailed information of synthesized samples.
| Samples a | Initial Ca/Si Ratio | Initial Al/Si Ratio | Initial Mg/Si Ratio | Real Ca/Si Ratio | Real Al/Si Ratio | Real Mg/Si Ratio | MQA b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSH_0.64 | 0.67 | 0 | 0 | 0.64 | 0 | 0 | TGA c |
| CSH_0.87 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.87 | 0 | 0 | TGA |
| CSH_1.02 | 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 1.02 | 0 | 0 | TGA |
| CSH_1.14 | 1.4 | 0 | 0 | 1.14 | 0 | 0 | TGA |
| CSH_1.25 | 1.6 | 0 | 0 | 1.25 | 0 | 0 | TGA |
| CASH_0.02 | 1.2 | 0.0125 | 0 | 0.77 | 0.018 | 0 | XRD d |
| CASH_0.03 | 1.2 | 0.025 | 0 | 0.80 | 0.034 | 0 | XRD |
| CASH_0.05 | 1.2 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.77 | 0.054 | 0 | XRD |
| CASH_0.08 | 1.2 | 0.1 | 0 | 0.83 | 0.081 | 0 | XRD |
| CASH_0.14 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0 | 0.86 | 0.14 | 0 | XRD |
| CMSH_0.01 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.0125 | 0.92 | 0 | 0.013 | XRD |
| CMSH_0.02 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.025 | 0.96 | 0 | 0.022 | XRD |
| CMSH_0.05 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 0 | 0.052 | XRD |
| CMSH_0.09 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.87 | 0 | 0.090 | XRD |
| CMSH_0.16 | 1.2 | 0 | 0.2 | 0.96 | 0 | 0.16 | XRD |
a The initial Ca/Si ratio, initial Al/Si ratio and initial Mg/Si ratio of C-(M)-(A)-S-H were obtained by calculating. The real Ca/Si ratio, real Al/Si ratio and real Mg/Si ratio of C-(M)-(A)-S-H were measured by using X-ray fluorescence (XRF). b Method for quantitative analysis of the CaCO3 content after carbonation experiment. c TGA is short for thermogravimetric analyzer. d XRD is short for X-ray diffraction.
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of synthesized C-(M)-(A)-S-H: (a) Ca/Si; (b) Al/Si; (c) Mg/Si.
Figure 2Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of C-(M)-(A)-S-H before carbonation.
Peak shifts, relative fraction of Qn, and mean chain length of C-(M)-(A)-S-H samples.
| Samples | Q1 | Q2p | Q2b | Q2u | Q3 | CL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ppm | % | ppm | % | ppm | % | ppm | % | ppm | % | ||
| CSH_0.64 | 79.00 | 9.37 | 84.17 | 23.16 | 91.46 | 9.76 | 87.00 | 36.27 | 95.35 | 21.44 | 16.77 |
| CSH_0.87 | 79.48 | 24.92 | 85.75 | 59329 | 83.57 | 15.80 | / | / | / | / | 8.03 |
| CSH_1.14 | 79.71 | 33.47 | 85.62 | 41.75 | 83.77 | 24.78 | / | / | / | / | 5.97 |
| CSH_1.25 | 79.34 | 64.37 | 84.54 | 35.63 | / | / | / | / | / | / | 3.11 |
| CASH_0.14 | 79.38 | 19.53 | 85.30 | 44.96 | 82.40 | 30.03 | 88.48 | 4.28 | 91.60 | 1.20 | 10.12 |
| CMSH_0.16 | 79.57 | 20.49 | 85.43 | 37.08 | 82.47 | 22.31 | / | / | 92.20 | 20.08 | 7.80 |
Figure 3XRD patterns of C-S-H with different Ca/Si ratio after carbonation for (a) 1 day, (b) 7 days and (c) 28 days.
Figure 4TGA patterns of C-S-H (a) before carbonation and (b) after carbonation for 28 days.
The content of CO2 of C -S-H before and after carbonation by mean of thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA).
| Samples | Mass Loss (wt. %) from TGA Data c | CCP b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CO2_0 a | CO2_1 | CO2_7 | CO2_28 | ||
| CSH_0.64 | 2.72 | 4.5 | 12.37 | 15.93 | 13.21 |
| CSH_0.87 | 2.69 | 2.97 | 5.53 | 9.12 | 6.43 |
| CSH_1.02 | 3.87 | 4.36 | 5.69 | 12.57 | 8.70 |
| CSH_1.14 | 6.31 | 9.30 | 10.60 | 20.33 | 14.02 |
| CSH_1.25 | 4.71 | 15.95 | 20.94 | 19.56 | 14.85 |
a CO2_N: the content of CO2 after carbonation for N day, N is the carbonation time. b CCP: the content of carbonation products = CO2_28–CO2_0. c TGA patterns of C-S-H after carbonation for 1 day and 7 days have not presented in this paper, only TGA data listed in Table 3.
Figure 529Si NMR spectra of C-S-H after carbonation for 28 days.
Figure 6XRD analysis of C-(A)-S-H after carbonation for 28 days.
The effect of Al/Si ratio on the content of calcite and vaterite.
| Samples | Calcite | Vaterite | Total CaCO3 | Amorphous Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CASH_0.02 | 13.88 | 33.36 | 47.24 | 52.76 |
| CASH_0.03 | 4.90 | 37.79 | 42.69 | 57.31 |
| CASH_0.05 | 6.92 | 39.31 | 46.22 | 53.78 |
| CASH_0.08 | 4.18 | 43.21 | 47.39 | 52.61 |
| CASH_0.14 | 2.77 | 44.25 | 47.03 | 52.97 |
Figure 7The effect of Al/Si ratio on the content of CaCO3.
Figure 8XRD analysis of C-(M)-S-H after carbonation for 28 days.
The effect of Al/Si ratio on the content of calcite and vaterite.
| Samples | Calcite | Vaterite | Total CaCO3 | Other Phase |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMSH_0.01 | 17.08 | 32.86 | 49.94 | 50.06 |
| CMSH_0.02 | 15.19 | 33.37 | 48.56 | 51.44 |
| CMSH_0.05 | 20.37 | 19.98 | 40.35 | 59.65 |
| CMSH_0.09 | 16.45 | 2.45 | 18.90 | 81.10 |
| CMSH_0.16 | 20.05 | 1.17 | 21.22 | 78.78 |
Figure 9The effect of Mg/Si ratio on the content of CaCO3.