Literature DB >> 31003088

How closely do mercury trends in fish and other aquatic wildlife track those in the atmosphere? - Implications for evaluating the effectiveness of the Minamata Convention.

Feiyue Wang1, Peter M Outridge2, Xinbin Feng3, Bo Meng3, Lars-Eric Heimbürger-Boavida4, Robert P Mason5.   

Abstract

The Minamata Convention to reduce anthropogenic mercury (Hg) emissions entered into force in 2017, and attention is now focused on how to best monitor its effectiveness at reducing Hg exposure to humans. A key question is how closely Hg concentrations in the human food chain, especially in fish and other aquatic wildlife, will track the changes in atmospheric Hg that are expected to occur following anthropogenic emission reductions. We investigated this question by evaluating several regional groups of case studies where Hg concentrations in aquatic biota have been monitored continuously or intermittently for several decades. Our analysis shows that in most cases Hg time trends in biota did not agree with concurrent Hg trends in atmospheric deposition or concentrations, and the divergence between the two trends has become more apparent over the past two decades. An over-arching general explanation for these results is that the impact of changing atmospheric inputs on biotic Hg is masked by two factors: 1) The aquatic environment contains a large inventory of legacy emitted Hg that remains available for bio-uptake leading to a substantial lag in biotic response time to a change in external inputs; and 2) Biotic Hg trends reflect the dominant effects of changes in multi-causal, local and regional processes (e.g., aquatic or terrestrial biogeochemical processes, feeding ecology, climate) that control the speciation, bioavailability, and bio-uptake of both present-day and legacy emitted Hg. Globally, climate change has become the most prevalent contributor to the divergence. A wide range of biotic Hg outcomes can thus be expected as anthropogenic atmospheric Hg emissions decline, depending on how these processes operate on specific regions and specific organisms. Therefore, evaluating the effectiveness of the Minamata Convention will require biomonitoring of multiple species that represent different trophic and ecological niches in multiple regions of the world. Crown
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic ecosystems; Atmospheric emissions; Climate change; Fish; Mercury; Minamata Convention

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31003088     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  9 in total

1.  Mercury biogeochemical cycling: A synthesis of recent scientific advances.

Authors:  Mae Sexauer Gustin; Michael S Bank; Kevin Bishop; Katlin Bowman; Brian Branfireun; John Chételat; Chris S Eckley; Chad R Hammerschmidt; Carl Lamborg; Seth Lyman; Antonio Martínez-Cortizas; Jonas Sommar; Martin Tsz-Ki Tsui; Tong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2020-05-23       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Mercury source changes and food web shifts alter contamination signatures of predatory fish from Lake Michigan.

Authors:  Ryan F Lepak; Joel C Hoffman; Sarah E Janssen; David P Krabbenhoft; Jacob M Ogorek; John F DeWild; Michael T Tate; Christopher L Babiarz; Runsheng Yin; Elizabeth W Murphy; Daniel R Engstrom; James P Hurley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Evaluation of Total Mercury in Sediments of the Descoberto River Environmental Protection Area-Brazil.

Authors:  Joelma Ferreira Portela; João Pedro Rudrigues de Souza; Myller de Sousa Tonhá; José Vicente Elias Bernardi; Jérémie Garnier; Jurandir Rodrigues SouzaDe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  A synthesis of patterns of environmental mercury inputs, exposure and effects in New York State.

Authors:  D C Evers; A K Sauer; D A Burns; N S Fisher; D C Bertok; E M Adams; M E H Burton; C T Driscoll
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.823

5.  Global health effects of future atmospheric mercury emissions.

Authors:  Yanxu Zhang; Zhengcheng Song; Shaojian Huang; Peng Zhang; Yiming Peng; Peipei Wu; Jing Gu; Stephanie Dutkiewicz; Huanxin Zhang; Shiliang Wu; Feiyue Wang; Long Chen; Shuxiao Wang; Ping Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  High mercury accumulation in deep-ocean hadal sediments.

Authors:  Hamed Sanei; Peter M Outridge; Kazumasa Oguri; Gary A Stern; Bo Thamdrup; Frank Wenzhöfer; Feiyue Wang; Ronnie N Glud
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Swift evolutionary response of microbes to a rise in anthropogenic mercury in the Northern Hemisphere.

Authors:  Matti O Ruuskanen; Stéphane Aris-Brosou; Alexandre J Poulain
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  A New Monitoring Effort for Asia: The Asia Pacific Mercury Monitoring Network (APMMN).

Authors:  Guey-Rong Sheu; David A Gay; David Schmeltz; Mark Olson; Shuenn-Chin Chang; Da-Wei Lin; Ly Sy Phu Nguyen
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.686

9.  Mercury in Ringed Seals (Pusa hispida) from the Canadian Arctic in Relation to Time and Climate Parameters.

Authors:  Magali Houde; Zofia E Taranu; Xiaowa Wang; Brent Young; P Gagnon; Steve H Ferguson; Michael Kwan; Derek C G Muir
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.742

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.