Literature DB >> 31002722

Prognostic differences between oligometastatic and polymetastatic extensive disease-small cell lung cancer.

Masayuki Shirasawa1, Tomoya Fukui1, Seiichiro Kusuhara1, Shinya Harada1, Noriko Nishinarita1, Yasuhiro Hiyoshi1, Mikiko Ishihara1, Masashi Kasajima1, Satoshi Igawa1, Masanori Yokoba2, Hisashi Mitsufuji3, Masaru Kubota1, Masato Katagiri2, Jiichiro Sasaki4, Katsuhiko Naoki1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Oligometastasis is a state in which cancer patients have a limited number of metastatic tumors; patients with oligometastases survive longer than those with polymetastases. Extensive disease (ED)-small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered a systemic disease and a poor survival. This study investigated whether the concept of oligometastases is prognostic factor also applicable to patients with ED-SCLC.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 141 consecutive patients with ED-SCLC between 2008 and 2016. The patients were divided into four subgroups: group 1; patients with solitary metastatic site in one organ (n = 31), group 2; patients with 2-5 metastatic sites in one organ (n = 18), group 3; patients with over 6 metastases in one organ (n = 15), and group 4; patients with 2 or more metastatic organs (n = 77).
RESULTS: It was identified that 49 patients with ED-SCLC had oligometastases (groups 1 + 2) and 92 had polymetastases (groups 3 + 4). The prognoses of patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases, defined as ≤5 metastases in a single organ, were significantly superior to those of patients with polymetastases [16.0 (95% CI, 11.0-21.0) months vs. 6.9 (95% CI, 6.0-7.8) months; p<0.001]. 43 of 49 patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases were relapsed after initial chemotherapy, and 38 (88%) experienced local recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases may have improved survival than those with polymetastases. As oligometastatic ED-SCLC tends to recur locally, local therapy combined with systemic chemotherapy may be a treatment option.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31002722      PMCID: PMC6474590          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for 12–15% of all lung cancer cases and is an aggressive disease characterized by widely disseminated metastases and a poor prognosis [1-3], although it is one of the most chemotherapy-sensitive solid tumor types [4-7]. Approximately 60–70% of patients with SCLC present with metastasis beyond a safe radiotherapy field, which is defined as extensive disease (ED). The standard treatment for ED-SCLC is systemic chemotherapy, and the median survival is 8–13 months [5, 6, 8–11]. Oligometastasis is correlated with the management of patients with several solid tumors including non-SCLC. Oligometastasis is defined as having 1–5 metastatic regions; it was shown that patients with oligometastases survive longer than those with polymetastases [12]. The patients with limited metastases such as oligometastases had been aggressively treated with surgical resection and/or radiation therapy [13-16]. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer proposed the 8th edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer in 2015 [17]. One of the most significant differences between the 7th and 8th editions is the change in the number of M descriptors from three (M0, M1a, and M1b) to four (M0, M1a, M1b, and M1c). It was showed that patients with non-SCLC and single metastasis have a better prognosis than those with polymetastases [17]. Although SCLC is considered a systemic disease, the number of metastatic sites was reported to be associated with the prognosis of patients with ED-SCLC [18, 19]. However, the differences in survival times between oligometastatic and polymetastatic ED-SCLC remain unclear. This retrospective study aimed to analyze whether oligometastases occur in patients with ED-SCLC patients according to the number of metastatic sites at diagnosis, and to examine the efficacy of treatment in these patients.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

This retrospective study enrolled 141 consecutive patients with a pathological diagnosed of SCLC in whom first-line systemic chemotherapy was initiated between January 2008 and December 2016 at the Kitasato University Hospital (Kanagawa, Japan). The results of computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), bone scintigraphy, and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were reviewed to classify the patients using the 8th TNM classification before treatment. Patients with distant metastasis (stage M1a, M1b and M1c) were classified as ED-SCLC.

Subgroups of ED-SCLC patients

The concept of oligometastasis was first proposed in Hellman’s study [12]; oligometastasis is a state in which cancer patients have 1–5 metastatic sites. In this study, ED-SCLC patients were divided into four subgroups: group 1, patients with solitary metastatic site in one organ; group 2, patients with 2–5 metastatic sites in one organ; group 3, patients with over 6 metastases in one organ; and group 4, patients with 2 or more metastatic organs.

Collection of clinical data

For each patient, the following data were extracted in addition to staging: age at diagnosis, sex, smoking status, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS), and laboratory data [including levels of albumin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase, sodium, neuron-specific enolase, and pro-gastrin-releasing peptide] obtained before initial chemotherapy. We examined the efficacy of cytotoxic chemotherapy and the sites of recurrence in oligometastatic and polymetastatic patients with ED-SCLC. Survival was measured from the date of diagnosis of SCLC to the date of treatment failure (death or disease progression) or last date of follow-up (data cut-off: October 31, 2017). Furthermore, we investigated the efficacy of local radiotherapy on patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases. The tumor response was classified in accordance with the Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (version 1.1), based on the patients’ complete medical histories and results of physical examinations, chest radiography, CT of the chest and abdomen, and other procedures such as brain MRI, PET, and bone scintigraphy.

Statistical analysis

The comparison of survival between the different subgroups was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between the subgroups based on prognostic factors were compared using the log-rank test. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for univariate and multivariate analyses. A two-tailed p value <0.05 indicated a significant difference for all analyses. The multivariate analysis was performed after adjusting for covariates that included the significant clinical factors in the univariate analyses. All analyses were performed using the SPSS software, version 25.0 (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA).

Ethics

This study was approved by the Kitasato University Medical Ethics Organization (B17-253). The need for patient consent was waived owing to the retrospective design of the study.

Results

Patient characteristics

The baseline clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. 16 of 141 patients (82%) were men, and the median age was 70 (range, 42–92) years. A total of 64 patients (45%) had single organ metastasis, whereas 77 (55%) had multiple organ metastases. All 141 patients underwent chest and abdominal CT scans, and 106 (75%), 23 (16%), and 137 (97%) patients underwent PET, bone scintigraphy, and MRI or CT of the brain as part of the initial staging evaluation, respectively. The single organ metastatic sites were the brain (n = 6), lung (n = 3), liver (n = 16), adrenal gland (n = 6), bone (n = 22), and other sites [n = 11; lymph node (n = 9), thyroid (n = 1), and pancreas (n = 1)].
Table 1

Patient characteristics in this study (n = 141).

Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4
(n = 31)(n = 18)(n = 15)(n = 77)
Age, n
    Median (range), years71 (49–82)68 (49–78)73 (51–92)70 (42–89)
    <75 years2514854
    75 years64723
Sex, n
    Male27141263
    Female44314
Smoking status, n
    Never1123
    Former/current29171273
    Unknown1011
ECOG PS, n
    0/12513940
    2/3/465637
Metastatic sites, n
    Brain510-
    Lung111-
    Liver556-
    Adrenal gland510-
    Bone688-
    Others920-
Blood tests, mean ± SD
    Albumin, g/dL3.8 ± 0.43.6 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.63.6 ± 0.4
    LDH, IU/L252.3 ± 98.0394.7 ± 315.0473.3 ± 347.6594.8 ± 1015.7
    ALP, U/L275.9± 88.8339.5 ± 232.0403.8 ± 260.3421.6 ± 317.1
    Sodium, mEq/L139.1 ± 3.6137.5 ± 5.7137.9 ± 4.4136.5 ± 5.9
    NSE, ng/mL46.5 ± 54.4123.3 ± 195.7132.8 ± 137.2102.8 ± 119.4
    Pro-GRP, ng/mL1,627.4 ± 3,577.41,426.3 ± 1,773.12,320.9 ± 3,670.43,798.6±12,424.2

Note: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; SD, standard deviation; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; pro-GRP, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide

Note: ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; SD, standard deviation; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase; NSE, neuron-specific enolase; pro-GRP, pro-gastrin-releasing peptide

Chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with ED-SCLC

All patients underwent systemic chemotherapy. The most commonly used first-line chemotherapy regimens were carboplatin-based doublet therapy in 69 patients (49%) and amrubicin monotherapy in 72 patients (51%). A median of 2 (range, 1–8) regimens were received in this study. The treatment details are presented in Table 2. The 141 patients had an OS of 10.0 [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.4–11.6] months, and PFS of 5.5 (95% CI, 4.8–6.3) months after first-line chemotherapy. The numbers of patients who underwent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) were 6 of 31 (19%) in group 1, 1 of 18 (6%) in group 2, 3 of 15 (20%) in group 3, and 7 of 77 (9%) in group 4. There was no statistically significant survival difference between the oligometastatic and polymetastatic ED-SCLC patients (p = 0.59).
Table 2

Efficacy of Treatment in the ED-SCLC patients (n = 141).

Group 1Group 2Group 3Group 4
(n = 31)(n = 18)(n = 15)(n = 77)
Regimen of initial chemotherapy, n (%)
    CDDP + CPT3 (9.7)1 (5.6)3 (20.0)8 (10.4)
    CDDP + ETP0 (0)2 (11.1)0 (0)4 (5.2)
    CBDCA + CPT1 (3.2)1 (5.6)0 (0)0 (0)
    CBDCA + ETP12 (38.7)3 (16.7)3 (20.0)19 (24.7)
    AMR11 (35.5)8 (44.4)7 (46.7)36 (46.8)
    CPT + AMR3 (9.7)1 (5.6)2 (13.3)4 (5.2)
    Others*1 (3.2)2 (11.1)0 (0)6 (7.8)
Number of regimen administered, n (%)
    16 (19.4)8 (44.4)6 (40.0)42 (54.5)
    212 (38.7)6 (33.3)7 (46.7)23 (29.9)
    313 (41.9)4 (22.3)2 (13.3)12 (15.6)
Response to initial chemotherapy, n (%)
    Partial response24 (77.4)10 (55.6)8 (53.3)49 (63.6)
    Stable disease4 (12.9)4 (22.2)4 (26.7)10 (13.0)
    Progressive disease1 (3.2)1 (5.6)3 (20.0)10 (13.0)
    Not evaluated2 (6.5)3 (16.7)0 (0)8 (10.4)
Thoracic radiotherapy, n (%)
    Yes6 (19.4)1 (5.6)3 (16.7)7 (9.1)
    No25 (80.6)17 (94.4)12 (83.3)70 (90.9)

Note: CDDP, cisplatin; CPT, irinotecan; ETP, etoposide; CBDCA, carboplatin; AMR, amrubicin

Note: CDDP, cisplatin; CPT, irinotecan; ETP, etoposide; CBDCA, carboplatin; AMR, amrubicin

Comparison of survival between the subgroups of ED-SCLC patients

The OS of patients with ED-SCLC in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 16.0 (95% CI, 13.9–18.1), 17.6 (95% CI, 6.6–28.6), 6.3 (95% CI, 6.1–6.5), and 7.0 (95% CI, 5.6–8.4) months, respectively. Of the entire study cohort, the OS of group 1 was similar to that of group 2 (p = 0.74) and superior to that of group 3 (p = 0.001) and group 4 (p <0.001). Moreover, the OS of group 2 was superior to that of the group 3 (p = 0.011) and group 4 (p = 0.001). The OS of group 3 was similar to that of group 4 (p = 0.82) (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) in group 1 (blue) vs. group 2 (green) vs. group 3 (red) vs. group 4 (yellow).

P values were determined using the log-rank test; the number of individuals in each group and median survival [95% confidence interval (CI)] are indicated. Group 1 included patients with a solitary metastatic site in one organ, group 2 patients with 2–5 metastatic sites in one organ, group 3 those with ≥6 metastases in one organ, and group 4 those with ≥2 organs with metastases. M; months.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) in group 1 (blue) vs. group 2 (green) vs. group 3 (red) vs. group 4 (yellow).

P values were determined using the log-rank test; the number of individuals in each group and median survival [95% confidence interval (CI)] are indicated. Group 1 included patients with a solitary metastatic site in one organ, group 2 patients with 2–5 metastatic sites in one organ, group 3 those with ≥6 metastases in one organ, and group 4 those with ≥2 organs with metastases. M; months. The PFS after the first-line chemotherapy was significantly different between patients with 1–5 metastases in one organ (groups 1 and 2; oligometastases) and those with ≥6 metastases in one organ or metastases in multiple organs (groups 3 and 4; polymetastases) [6.4 (95% CI, 5.8–7.0) vs. 4.4 (95% CI, 3.8–5.0) months; p = 0.001; Fig 2A]. The OS of patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases was also significantly better than that of patients with polymetastases [16.0 (95% CI, 11.0–21.0) vs. 6.9 (95% CI, 6.0–7.8) months; p <0.001; Fig 2B].
Fig 2

Kaplan–Meier analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) (A) and overall survival (OS) (B) of patients with oligometastases ( P values were determined using the log-rank test; the number of individuals in each group and median survival (95% CI) are indicated. M; months, Oligo; oligometastases, Poly; polymetastases.

Kaplan–Meier analyses of progression-free survival (PFS) (A) and overall survival (OS) (B) of patients with oligometastases ( P values were determined using the log-rank test; the number of individuals in each group and median survival (95% CI) are indicated. M; months, Oligo; oligometastases, Poly; polymetastases. In the univariate survival analysis of patients with ED-SCLC who received chemotherapy, patients with polymetastases had an unfavorable prognosis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.83; 95% CI, 1.48–2.27; p <0.001] in addition to those with known prognostic factors such as older age, lower PS, and serum levels of LDH and sodium. In the multivariate analysis, having polymetastases was significantly associated with an unfavorable prognosis when compared to having oligometastases (HR 1.76; 95% CI, 1.41–2.21; p = <0.001) (Table 3).
Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival in the ED-SCLC patients (n = 141).

UnivariateMultivariate
HR95% CIPHR95% CIP
Age1.831.23–2.740.0031.891.25–2.860.003
    ≥75 vs. <75
Sex1.090.68–1.740.72
    Female vs. male
Smoking status1.300.53–3.200.57
    Former/Current vs. never
ECOG PS1.621.11–2.370.011.310.88–1.950.18
    2–4 vs. 0–1
Pleural effusion1.000.69–1.451.00
    Yes vs. no
Albumin1.230.78–1.930.37
    Low vs. normal
LDH2.141.34–3.420.0021.560.96–2.540.076
    High vs. normal
ALP1.360.94–1.970.10
    High vs. low
Sodium1.881.28–2.780.0011.651.11–2.440.013
    Low vs. normal
Platinum-based chemotherapy0.710.49–1.020.03
    Yes vs. No
Metastases1.831.48–2.27<0.0011.761.41–2.21<0.001
    Oligo- vs. polymetastases

Note: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase

Note: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ALP, alkaline phosphatase

Patterns of progression in oligometastatic ED-SCLC

We then investigated the patterns of recurrence in patients with ED-SCLC and oligometastases. In 43 of 49 (88%) patients with oligometastases, relapses occurred in the primary lung tumor in 27 (63%) patients, metastatic site in 8 (19%) patients and 3 (7%) patients experiencing both (Fig 3). In 35 of 43 (81%) patients, the primary tumor had progressed. In all patients with brain, lung, or adrenal gland metastases, relapse occurred in both the primary tumor and metastatic organs before chemotherapy.
Fig 3

Pattern of recurrence in the oligometastatic ED-SCLC patients (n = 49).

43 of 49 (88%) ED-SCLC patients had relapsed after initial chemotherapy. Of the patients who relapsed, 27 (63%) exacerbated primary lung lesion (red), 8 (19%) relapsed at oligometastatic sites (orange) and 3 (7%) relapsed in both the primary and the oligometastatic sites (light orange). 5 (12%) patients had recurrence into new lesions (green).

Pattern of recurrence in the oligometastatic ED-SCLC patients (n = 49).

43 of 49 (88%) ED-SCLC patients had relapsed after initial chemotherapy. Of the patients who relapsed, 27 (63%) exacerbated primary lung lesion (red), 8 (19%) relapsed at oligometastatic sites (orange) and 3 (7%) relapsed in both the primary and the oligometastatic sites (light orange). 5 (12%) patients had recurrence into new lesions (green). Next, we evaluated the efficacy of local radiotherapy in patients with oligometastatic ED-SCLC. Patients with oligometastatic ED-SCLC who underwent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT; n = 7) tended to have better survival time than those who did not underwent TRT (n = 42), although there was no significant difference [23.4 (95% CI, 10.1–36.7) months vs. 15.8 (95% CI, 12.7–18.9) months; p = 0.42; S1 Fig].

Discussion

This study suggests that oligometastatic ED-SCLC has a better prognosis than polymetastatic disease and is characterized by local recurrence. Some studies evaluated the revised M descriptors of the 8th edition of TNM classification in patients with ED-SCLC [20, 21]. In this study, the OS of patients with ED-SCLC and a single metastasis in one organ (group 1), categorized as the M1b stage based on the 8th edition of TNM classification, was 16.0 (95% CI, 11.4–21.0) months. Furthermore, the OS of patients with ED-SCLC and 2–5 metastases in one organ (group 2) was not inferior to that of group 1 patients and was superior to that of patients with ≥6 metastases in one organ (group 3) or ≥2 metastatic organs (group 4). Oligometastases means that patients have a limited number of metastases and organ site(s) and may have a more indolent biology and progression at existing sites without widespread metastases. These patients have a better prognosis than those who have widespread metastases [12]. Based on the concept of oligometastasis, patients with ED-SCLC and 1–5 metastases in one organ were defined as having “oligometastatic” ED-SCLC. In this study, we observed a significant difference in the outcomes of patients with ED-SCLC patients and oligometastases depending on the site of oligometastatic organs (S2 Fig). The survival of patients with oligometastases in the brain [n = 6; 40.8 (95% CI, 10.6–71.0) months] or adrenal gland [n = 6; 34.2 (95% CI, 3.4–65.0) months] metastases was better than that of those with metastases in other organs [n = 37; 13.6 (95% CI, 10.7–16.5) months]. It was reported that only 27% of patients with asymptomatic brain metastases responded to systemic chemotherapy [22]. Four of six patients (67%) with brain metastases had recurrence in the brain after initial chemotherapy. Among patients with non-SCLC, the prognosis of single brain metastasis has been shown to be considerably better than that of multiple brain metastases; furthermore, patients with non-SCLC and single brain metastasis benefit from locally aggressive and ablative treatments such as stereotactic irradiation or surgery [23-25]. Local radiation therapy for brain metastases is also considered to be effective in SCLC patients [26]. In this study, 6 patients with ≤5 brain metastases underwent local treatments; one patient underwent brain tumor excision before initiating chemotherapy, all patients underwent whole-brain radiation therapy, and 3 of 6 patients underwent a cyber knife treatment for exacerbation of brain metastases after WBRT. Brain irradiation underwent somewhere during treatment after chemotherapy. This finding suggests that local brain irradiation may be beneficial in patients with systemic disease in ED-SCLC patients with oligometastases. Regarding the occurrence of oligometastases in adrenal glands, initial staging should be carefully performed as the presence of a tumor does not necessarily represent metastasis but could indicate a benign adenoma (2–9% of cases) [27]. Although CT, PET, and MRI are useful tools for the detection of adrenal metastases, it should be noted these non-invasive modalities have some limitations [28-33]. For distinguishing adrenal metastases, PET-CT with a mean attenuation ≥10 HU and SUV max ≥3.1 had 97.3% sensitivity and 86.2% specificity [34]. Six patients with adrenal metastasis in this study met the condition of PET-CT. Regarding the cause of death of the six patients with adrenal metastases, three had exacerbations of the primary tumor, one had brain metastases, and the remaining had disease progression while managing adverse events, febrile neutropenia, and renal failure due to chemotherapy. None of the patients received treatment for local adrenal metastasis, and none died from adrenal metastasis. In previous studies, 75–90% of patients with ED-SCLC had residual intrathoracic disease, 90% developed intrathoracic progression after chemotherapy [35], and most patients with ED-SCLC died of thoracic progression and associated complications [36]. In this study, of the 38 patients with 1–5 metastases (excluding those who survived or whose cause of death was unknown), 27 (71%) died due to exacerbation of the primary lesions. The patients with oligometastatic ED-SCLC who underwent TRT (n = 7) trended to have a better prognosis than those who did not undergo TRT (n = 42). A recent study showed that the introduction of high-dose radiation therapy to chemotherapy was an effective treatment strategy for patients with ED-SCLC as it significantly improved patients’ survival [37]. Furthermore, patients with 1–4 extracranial metastases who underwent consolidative radiation therapy had a 50% reduction in intrathoracic recurrence than those who did not (80% vs. 44%, respectively; p = 0.001) [38]. In a previous report, TRT in ED-SCLC patients with 0–2 distant organ metastases significantly improved PFS (n = 61; HR = 2.02; p = 0.003) [39]. Thus, we suggested that patients with oligometastatic ED-SCLC, who had mainly intrathoracic progression, should be indicated for intrathoracic irradiation. Our study had several limitations. This study was a retrospective study conducted at a single institution; therefore, our results cannot be regarded as definitive. The sample size may not have been sufficient. Some of the patients received local radiotherapy, but others did not. Patients who received high- or low-dose radiotherapy and the period when they received the treatment were not identified. To determine which patients will most likely benefit from escalated doses of radiotherapy, a large prospective study is needed to corroborate our findings.

Conclusion

Patients with oligometastatic ED-SCLC may have a better prognosis than those with polymetastatic disease. Patients with oligometastatic ED-SCLC patients tend to experience local recurrence. For oligo- and polymetastatic ED-SCLC patients, treatment strategies should be developed separately. Local treatment combined with systemic chemotherapy may be a treatment option for the oligometastatic ED-SCLC patients, especially in patients with cerebral or adrenal grand oligometastases.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) for the patients treated with thoracic radiotherapy (TRT).

Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS for the patients with oligometastases (blue) vs. the patients with polymetastases (red) treated with TRT. P values were determined using the log-rank test; the number of individuals in each group and median survival (95% confidence interval) are indicated. M; months. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival (OS) in patients with oligometastases for each metastatic organ.

Kaplan–Meier analysis of OS in patients with oligometastases for each oligometastatic site: adrenal gland (blue), brain (green), liver (black), lung (yellow), bone metastases (gray), the others (red). The number of individuals in each group and median survival (95% confidence interval) are indicated. M; months. (TIF) Click here for additional data file.

Patient characteristics and treatment outcome.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  39 in total

1.  Characterization of adrenal masses using unenhanced CT: an analysis of the CT literature.

Authors:  G W Boland; M J Lee; G S Gazelle; E F Halpern; M M McNicholas; P R Mueller
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The revision of 8th edition TNM stage criteria is more accurate in prediction postoperative survival for SCLC patients.

Authors:  Jian Li; Yongsheng Zhao; Chuan Li; Longfei Zhu; Chengwu Liu; Lunxu Liu
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 6.071

3.  Surgical Treatment of Extrapulmonary Oligometastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Till Plönes; Thomas Osei-Agyemang; Alexander Krohn; Bernward Passlick
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Treatment of brain metastases of small-cell lung cancer: comparing teniposide and teniposide with whole-brain radiotherapy--a phase III study of the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Cooperative Group.

Authors:  P E Postmus; H Haaxma-Reiche; E F Smit; H J Groen; H Karnicka; T Lewinski; J van Meerbeeck; M Clerico; A Gregor; D Curran; T Sahmoud; A Kirkpatrick; G Giaccone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-10-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Preoperative evaluation of adrenal lesions based on imaging studies and laparoscopic adrenalectomy in patients with otherwise operable lung cancer.

Authors:  Hong Kwan Kim; Yong Soo Choi; Kwhanmien Kim; Jhingook Kim; Young Mog Shim
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 6.  An individual patient data metaanalysis of outcomes and prognostic factors after treatment of oligometastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Allison B Ashworth; Suresh Senan; David A Palma; Marc Riquet; Yong Chan Ahn; Umberto Ricardi; Maria T Congedo; Daniel R Gomez; Gavin M Wright; Giulio Melloni; Michael T Milano; Claudio V Sole; Tommaso M De Pas; Dennis L Carter; Andrew J Warner; George B Rodrigues
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.785

7.  Prophylactic cranial irradiation in extensive small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ben Slotman; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Gijs Kramer; Elaine Rankin; Michael Snee; Matthew Hatton; Pieter Postmus; Laurence Collette; Elena Musat; Suresh Senan
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Does surgery for primary non-small cell lung cancer and cerebral metastasis have any impact on survival?

Authors:  Amit Modi; Hunaid A Vohra; David F Weeden
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-01-20

9.  Treatment of small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  James R Jett; Steven E Schild; Kenneth A Kesler; Gregory P Kalemkerian
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Randomised phase III trial of carboplatin plus etoposide vs split doses of cisplatin plus etoposide in elderly or poor-risk patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer: JCOG 9702.

Authors:  H Okamoto; K Watanabe; H Kunikane; A Yokoyama; S Kudoh; T Asakawa; T Shibata; H Kunitoh; T Tamura; N Saijo
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sarcopenia and Visceral Adiposity Are Not Independent Prognostic Markers for Extensive Disease of Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Centered Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Seigo Minami; Shoichi Ihara; Kiyoshi Komuta
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2020-08-10

2.  Gustave Roussy Immune Score and Royal Marsden Hospital Prognostic Score Are Prognostic Markers for Extensive Disease of Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Seigo Minami; Shouichi Ihara; Kiyoshi Komuta
Journal:  World J Oncol       Date:  2020-05-14

3.  Small cell lung cancer with thyroid gland oligometastasis: A case report.

Authors:  Toshiharu Tsutsui; Haruna Yamaki; Takashi Kumagai; Chisa Omori; Hiroaki Kobayashi; Yumiko Kakizaki; Yoshihiro Miyashita
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Recurrence dynamics after curative surgery in patients with invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Yoon; Jun Kang; Ho Yun Lee; Min A Lee; Na Young Hwang; Hong Kwan Kim; Jhingook Kim
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2022-04-05

Review 5.  Liquid biopsies to occult brain metastasis.

Authors:  Asad Ur Rehman; Parvez Khan; Shailendra Kumar Maurya; Jawed A Siddiqui; Juan A Santamaria-Barria; Surinder K Batra; Mohd Wasim Nasser
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 41.444

Review 6.  Local Consolidative Therapy for Oligometastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Patricia Mae G Santos; Xingzhe Li; Daniel R Gomez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 6.575

7.  A case of ruptured ovarian metastasis of small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ryuta Yamamoto; Kazunori Tobino; Kazuki Uchida; Ryunosuke Ooi; Kohei Yoshimine
Journal:  Respir Med Case Rep       Date:  2022-07-31

8.  Efficacy of osimertinib for preventing leptomeningeal metastasis derived from advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched retrospective study.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Jing Cai; Zhimin Zeng; Anwen Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.430

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.