Literature DB >> 31002192

Improvements in red blood cell transfusion utilization following implementation of a single-unit default for electronic ordering.

Matthew A Warner1,2, Kalli K Schaefer2, Nageswar Madde2, Jennifer M Burt2, Andrew A Higgins2, Daryl J Kor1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevention of excessive allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is an important component of patient blood management initiatives. In this investigation, changes in transfusion behaviors following modification of computerized physician order entry (CPOE) procedures for RBC transfusions to a single-unit default quantity were assessed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This is an observational cohort study of adults for whom nonemergency allogeneic RBC transfusions were ordered in the 2 years before and 2 years after the date of modification of the CPOE system to a single-unit default (June 18, 2015). Changes in the frequency of single- versus multiunit RBC transfusion orders and other transfusion metrics were compared between preintervention and postintervention cohorts.
RESULTS: A total of 52,773 unique transfusion orders for 61,989 RBC units were included, of which 60,045 (96.9%) were transfused. Single-unit orders increased annually, from 10,404 (74.1%) in the first year to 11,645 (88.6%) in the last year, while multiunit orders decreased by more than half (p < 0.0001). The number of RBC units transfused decreased by 13.9% from 32,528 in the preintervention cohort to 27,497 in the post intervention cohort (p < 0.0001) with an estimated reduction in transfusion-related expenditures of nearly $4 million. The percentage of transfusions associated with a posttransfusion hemoglobin of10 g/dL or greater decreased by 34.5% (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Modification of the CPOE process such that nonemergency RBC transfusion orders were defaulted to a single unit was associated with decreased rates of multiunit RBC transfusion orders, lower transfusion volumes, and substantial cost savings.
© 2019 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31002192      PMCID: PMC6610646          DOI: 10.1111/trf.15316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  17 in total

1.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Authors:  Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Matthias Egger; Stuart J Pocock; Peter C Gøtzsche; Jan P Vandenbroucke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Clinical practice guideline: red blood cell transfusion in adult trauma and critical care.

Authors:  Lena M Napolitano; Stanley Kurek; Fred A Luchette; Gary L Anderson; Michael R Bard; William Bromberg; William C Chiu; Mark D Cipolle; Keith D Clancy; Lawrence Diebel; William S Hoff; K Michael Hughes; Imtiaz Munshi; Donna Nayduch; Rovinder Sandhu; Jay A Yelon; Howard L Corwin; Philip S Barie; Samuel A Tisherman; Paul C Hebert
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-12

3.  Activity-based costs of blood transfusions in surgical patients at four hospitals.

Authors:  Aryeh Shander; Axel Hofmann; Sherri Ozawa; Oliver M Theusinger; Hans Gombotz; Donat R Spahn
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 4.  Consensus and controversies in platelet transfusion.

Authors:  Neelam Marwaha; R R Sharma
Journal:  Transfus Apher Sci       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 1.764

5.  Informatics infrastructure for syndrome surveillance, decision support, reporting, and modeling of critical illness.

Authors:  Vitaly Herasevich; Brian W Pickering; Yue Dong; Steve G Peters; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Restrictive blood transfusion practices are associated with improved patient outcomes.

Authors:  Lawrence T Goodnough; Paul Maggio; Eric Hadhazy; Lisa Shieh; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Paul Khari; Neil Shah
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 7.  Blood product transfusion in the critical care setting.

Authors:  Daryl J Kor; Ognjen Gajic
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.687

8.  The appropriateness of red blood cell use and the extent of overtransfusion: right decision? Right amount?

Authors:  Paul J Barr; Michael Donnelly; Chris R Cardwell; Michael Parker; Kieran Morris; Karen E M Bailie
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 3.157

9.  A retrospective study evaluating single-unit red blood cell transfusions in reducing allogeneic blood exposure.

Authors:  M Ma; K Eckert; F Ralley; I Chin-Yee
Journal:  Transfus Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.019

Review 10.  New technologies in pediatric anesthesia.

Authors:  Helen Holtby; Justin J Skowno; Daryl J Kor; Randall P Flick; Shoichi Uezono
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.556

View more
  3 in total

1.  Implementation of a Comprehensive Patient Blood Management Program for Hospitalized Patients at a Large United States Medical Center.

Authors:  Matthew A Warner; Phillip J Schulte; Andrew C Hanson; Nageswar R Madde; Jennifer M Burt; Andrew A Higgins; Nicole M Andrijasevic; Justin D Kreuter; Eapen K Jacob; James R Stubbs; Daryl J Kor
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 7.616

2.  Preoperative Anemia Screening and Treatment: Is It Worth the Return on Investment?

Authors:  Matthew A Warner; Susan M Goobie
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Electronic transfusion consent and blood delivering pattern improve the management of blood bank in China.

Authors:  Luxi Jiang; Guobing Zhang; Ke Hao; Weiling Xiang; Qin Zhang; Yiwei Xie; Zhen Wang; Bingyu Chen; Yaoqiang Du
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.908

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.