| Literature DB >> 31001930 |
Qian Xia1, Jian Zhang1, Yanshuo Han1, Xiaoyu Zhang1, Han Jiang1, Yu Lun1, Xiaoyu Wu1, Qingwei Gang1, Zhimin Liu1, Dittmar Böckler2, Zhiquan Duan1, Shijie Xin1.
Abstract
Abdominal arterial aneurysm (AAA) shares many features with autoimmune diseases and appears to be a T-cell-mediated process. In addition, certain epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation, are associated with AAA. In this study, we investigated epigenetic modifications in regulatory T cells (Tregs) from AAA patients. We used flow cytometry to sort FOXP3+ CD4+ CD25+ Tregs from the peripheral blood of AAA patients and from healthy controls (HC), and then detected DNA methylation and histone modifications by ELISA. The DNA methylation rate of Tregs was significantly higher in AAA patients than in the HC group (0.159 ± 0.08% vs 0.098 ± 0.03%, P < 0.05), while the acetylation rates of H3 and H3K9 histones were lower in the AAA than in the HC group. We also examined the expression of mRNA encoding enzymes that catalyze making and removing epigenetic modifications by real-time PCR: we found that mRNA levels of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) 1 and DNMT3A were higher in the AAA than in the HC group, mRNA levels of methyl-CpG-binding domain protein (MBD) 2 and MBD4 were higher in the AAA than in the HC group (MBD2: 6.21 ± 2.57 vs 3.04 ± 1.45; MBD4: 7.76 ± 3.48 vs 4.97 ± 3.10; both P < 0.05), and mRNA levels of histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1 and HDAC5 were significantly up-regulated in the AAA compared with the HC group (HDAC1: 2.17 ± 1.18 vs 1.51 ± 0.99; HDAC5: 1.35 ± 0.49 vs 0.94 ± 0.76; both P < 0.05). Together, our results reveal that rates of DNA methylation and histone modifications of Tregs are significantly altered in AAA patients.Entities:
Keywords: DNA methylation; abdominal aortic aneurysm; epigenetics; histone modifications; regulatory T cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31001930 PMCID: PMC6551495 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: FEBS Open Bio ISSN: 2211-5463 Impact factor: 2.693
The primers for real‐time PCR.
| Gene | Primer | Sequence(5′–3′) |
|---|---|---|
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
| |
|
| Forward |
|
| Reverse |
|
Demographics of AAA patients and healthy controls. Comparison by Unpaired Student's t test or χ2 test. WBC (white blood cell).
| AAA group ( | Control group ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female | 27/5 | 26/4 | 0.303 |
| Age (years) | 63.93 ± 8.14 | 60.45 ± 11.17 | 0.916 |
| Smoking history (n (%)) | 5 (27) | 8 (40) | 0.506 |
| Hypertension history ( | 11 (61) | 9 (45) | 0.352 |
| Diabetes history ( | 3 (16.7) | 4 (20) | 0.128 |
| Coronary disease ( | 3 (16.7) | 3 (15) | 1 |
| WBC count (×109/L) | 7.83 ± 2.56 | 6.59 ± 1.73 | 0.102 |
| Lymph count (×109/L) | 1.85 ± 0.39 | 2.17 ± 0.62 | 0.11 |
Figure 1DNA methylation rate and acetylation rate of histone H3 and H3K9 in Tregs were changed in AAA patients. (A) DNA methylation rate of Tregs was up‐regulated in AAA patients; (B) Acetylation rate of histone H3 and H3K9 in Tregs was reduced in AAA patients. All data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by unpaired Student's t test. n = 32 in AAA group and n = 30 in HC group. *P < 0.05 compared with HC group.
Figure 2Expression of DNMT1 and DNMT3A mRNA was up‐regulated in AAA patients. All data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by unpaired Student's t test. n = 32 in AAA group and n = 30 in HC group. *P < 0.05 compared with HC group.
Figure 3Expression of MBD2 and MBD4 mRNA was up‐regulated in AAA patients. All data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by unpaired Student's t test. n = 32 in AAA group and n = 30 in HC group. *P < 0.05 compared with HC group.
Figure 4HDAC1 and HDAC5 mRNA expression was increased in AAA patients. All data are presented as mean ± SD and analyzed by unpaired Student's t test. n = 32 in AAA group and n = 30 in HC group. *P < 0.05 compared with HC group.