Xiteng Yin1,2, Shengwei Han1,2, Chuanhui Song1,2, Huihui Zou1,2, Zheng Wei1,2, Wenguang Xu1,2, Jianchuan Ran1,2, Chuanchao Tang1,2, Yufeng Wang1,2, Yu Cai2, Qingang Hu3,4, Wei Han5,6. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, No 30 Zhongyang Road, Nanjing, 210008, China. 2. Central Laboratory of Stomatology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, No 22 Hankou Road, Nanjing, 210093, China. 3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, No 30 Zhongyang Road, Nanjing, 210008, China. qghu@nju.edu.cn. 4. Central Laboratory of Stomatology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, No 22 Hankou Road, Nanjing, 210093, China. qghu@nju.edu.cn. 5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, No 30 Zhongyang Road, Nanjing, 210008, China. doctorhanwei@hotmail.com. 6. Central Laboratory of Stomatology, Nanjing Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, No 22 Hankou Road, Nanjing, 210093, China. doctorhanwei@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play an important role in drug resistance in many tumors, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, how TAMs interact with HNSCC cells to induce drug resistance, especially under hypoxic conditions, is unclear. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of TAM-induced gefitinib resistance in HNSCC cells and sought for novel therapeutic strategies. METHODS: The effects of hypoxia-treated HNSCC cells on the migration and polarization of macrophages were analyzed. Recombinant cytokine proteins and neutralizing antibodies were used as controls. In addition, we assessed the cytotoxic effects of gefitinib on HNSCC cells treated with M2-type macrophage conditioned medium, and carried out a cytokine antibody array analysis, thereby revealing the key factor CCL15. The relationship between serum CCL15 expression levels and prognosis in HNSCC patients was analyzed. In addition, we performed bioinformatic analyses to pursue the mechanisms of CCL15-induced gefitinib resistance. Finally, metformin was used to evaluate the sensitizing effects of gefitinib treatment on HNSCC cells in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We found that HNSCC cells recruited macrophages by secreting VEGF and polarized the macrophages to the M2 phenotype through IL-6. Conversely, we found that M2-type TAMs promoted HNSCC cell resistance to gefitinib through paracrine CCL15 signaling. The serum CCL15 levels in HNSCC patients showed a significant correlation with patient prognosis. Furthermore, we found that M2-type TAMs could suppress the sensitivity of HNSCC cells to gefitinib through the CCL15-CCR1-NF-κB pathway. In addition, we found that metformin not only inhibited CCL15 expression in M2-type TAMs enhanced by hypoxia, but also suppressed CCR1 surface expression in HNSCC cells. Encouragingly, we found that metformin sensitized HNSCC cells to gefitinib treatment in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data we conclude that we have identified a novel interaction between M2-type TAMs and HNSCC cells that contributes to gefitinib resistance. We also found that metformin inhibited the cross-talk between macrophages and tumor cells, thereby eliciting therapeutic effects both in vitro and in vivo.
BACKGROUND:Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play an important role in drug resistance in many tumors, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, how TAMs interact with HNSCC cells to induce drug resistance, especially under hypoxic conditions, is unclear. In this study, we investigated the mechanism of TAM-induced gefitinib resistance in HNSCC cells and sought for novel therapeutic strategies. METHODS: The effects of hypoxia-treated HNSCC cells on the migration and polarization of macrophages were analyzed. Recombinant cytokine proteins and neutralizing antibodies were used as controls. In addition, we assessed the cytotoxic effects of gefitinib on HNSCC cells treated with M2-type macrophage conditioned medium, and carried out a cytokine antibody array analysis, thereby revealing the key factor CCL15. The relationship between serum CCL15 expression levels and prognosis in HNSCC patients was analyzed. In addition, we performed bioinformatic analyses to pursue the mechanisms of CCL15-induced gefitinib resistance. Finally, metformin was used to evaluate the sensitizing effects of gefitinib treatment on HNSCC cells in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: We found that HNSCC cells recruited macrophages by secreting VEGF and polarized the macrophages to the M2 phenotype through IL-6. Conversely, we found that M2-type TAMs promoted HNSCC cell resistance to gefitinib through paracrine CCL15 signaling. The serum CCL15 levels in HNSCC patients showed a significant correlation with patient prognosis. Furthermore, we found that M2-type TAMs could suppress the sensitivity of HNSCC cells to gefitinib through the CCL15-CCR1-NF-κB pathway. In addition, we found that metformin not only inhibited CCL15 expression in M2-type TAMs enhanced by hypoxia, but also suppressed CCR1 surface expression in HNSCC cells. Encouragingly, we found that metformin sensitized HNSCC cells to gefitinib treatment in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data we conclude that we have identified a novel interaction between M2-type TAMs and HNSCC cells that contributes to gefitinib resistance. We also found that metformin inhibited the cross-talk between macrophages and tumor cells, thereby eliciting therapeutic effects both in vitro and in vivo.