Literature DB >> 31001656

Effects of Protected Area Size on Conservation Return on Investment.

Seong-Hoon Cho1, Kristen Thiel2, Paul R Armsworth3, Bijay P Sharma4.   

Abstract

The objective of this research is to examine how protected area size influences the conservation benefit and acquisition cost of creating a protected area, how the resulting effects influence the predicted rate of return on investment (ROI), and how those relationships change prioritization decision-making for selecting protected areas compared with decisions based only on conservation benefit and decisions based only on acquisition cost. The objective is accomplished in an econometric framework by analyzing the parcel-level acquisition cost and conservation benefit measured by the change in potential fragmentation patterns on the landscape resulting from protection. We focus on areas acquired by The Nature Conservancy in central and southern Appalachia, United States. As an indicator of the change in landscape fragmentation, we use a fragmentation statistic known as effective mesh size. Although the effect of protected parcel size on predicted ROI is inelastic, greater conservation effectiveness is obtained with larger protected parcels than with smaller ones on average. Protected parcel size influences parcels' rankings for protection more (less) when only the predicted change in effective mesh size of protected area (only the predicted acquisition cost per area) is used for prioritizing parcels than when the ranking of parcels is determined by the predicted ROI. These findings imply that, although protected parcel size is important, failure to prioritize using ROI could result in an inappropriate level of emphasis being given to protected parcel size than is warranted.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acquisition cost; Conservation return on investment; Economies of scale with area size; Effective mesh size; Protected area

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31001656     DOI: 10.1007/s00267-019-01164-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Manage        ISSN: 0364-152X            Impact factor:   3.266


  18 in total

1.  Using return on investment to maximize conservation effectiveness in Argentine grasslands.

Authors:  William Murdoch; Jai Ranganathan; Stephen Polasky; James Regetz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The conservation benefits of cost-effective land acquisition: a case study in Maryland.

Authors:  Kent Donald Messer
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 6.789

3.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts.

Authors:  Kerrie A Wilson; Marissa F McBride; Michael Bode; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The grain of spatially referenced economic cost and biodiversity benefit data and the effectiveness of a cost targeting strategy.

Authors:  N J Sutton; P R Armsworth
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 6.560

Review 5.  Inclusion of costs in conservation planning depends on limited datasets and hopeful assumptions.

Authors:  Paul R Armsworth
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Cost-effective priorities for global mammal conservation.

Authors:  Josie Carwardine; Kerrie A Wilson; Gerardo Ceballos; Paul R Ehrlich; Robin Naidoo; Takuya Iwamura; Stefan A Hajkowicz; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Identifying priority areas for conservation: a global assessment for forest-dependent birds.

Authors:  Graeme M Buchanan; Paul F Donald; Stuart H M Butchart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Avoiding costly conservation mistakes: the importance of defining actions and costs in spatial priority setting.

Authors:  Josie Carwardine; Kerrie A Wilson; Matt Watts; Andres Etter; Carissa J Klein; Hugh P Possingham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Factoring economic costs into conservation planning may not improve agreement over priorities for protection.

Authors:  Paul R Armsworth; Heather B Jackson; Seong-Hoon Cho; Melissa Clark; Joseph E Fargione; Gwenllian D Iacona; Taeyoung Kim; Eric R Larson; Thomas Minney; Nathan A Sutton
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 17.694

10.  Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity.

Authors:  Oscar Venter; Richard A Fuller; Daniel B Segan; Josie Carwardine; Thomas Brooks; Stuart H M Butchart; Moreno Di Marco; Takuya Iwamura; Liana Joseph; Damien O'Grady; Hugh P Possingham; Carlo Rondinini; Robert J Smith; Michelle Venter; James E M Watson
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.