OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association of axillary lymph node ratio (LNR) and number of positive lymph nodes (pN) with the risk of breast cancer recurrence and death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of node-positive stage II and III breast cancer patients diagnosed and treated between 2008 and 2009 at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Brazil. Overall and disease-free survival curves for number of positive lymph nodes (pN) and lymph node ratio (LNR) risk groups were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using stepwise forward Cox regression models. RESULTS: In total, 628 women with node-positive breast cancer were included. Most patients (69.5%) had advanced clinical stage tumors (≥IIB). The median follow-up was 58 months (range: 3-92 months). The adjusted recurrence hazard of pN2 and pN3 patients was 2.47 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.72-3.56) and 2.42 (1.62-3.60), respectively, compared to pN1 patients (p<0.001), while the hazard of intermediate (0.21-0.65) and high-risk (>0.65) LNR was 2.11 (1.49-3.00) and 3.19 (2.12-4.80), respectively, compared to low-risk LNR (≤0.20) patients (p<0.001). On the other hand, the hazard of death of pN2 and pN3 patients was 2.17 (1.42-3.30) and 2.41 (1.53-3.78), respectively (p<0.001), and the hazard of intermediate (0.21-0.65) and high-risk (>0.65) LNR patients was 1.70 (1.13-2.56) and 2.74 (1.75-4.28), respectively (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Higher pN and LNR were associated with shorter disease-free survival and overall survival times.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the association of axillary lymph node ratio (LNR) and number of positive lymph nodes (pN) with the risk of breast cancer recurrence and death. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of node-positive stage II and III breast cancer patients diagnosed and treated between 2008 and 2009 at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Brazil. Overall and disease-free survival curves for number of positive lymph nodes (pN) and lymph node ratio (LNR) risk groups were constructed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed using stepwise forward Cox regression models. RESULTS: In total, 628 women with node-positive breast cancer were included. Most patients (69.5%) had advanced clinical stage tumors (≥IIB). The median follow-up was 58 months (range: 3-92 months). The adjusted recurrence hazard of pN2 and pN3 patients was 2.47 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.72-3.56) and 2.42 (1.62-3.60), respectively, compared to pN1 patients (p<0.001), while the hazard of intermediate (0.21-0.65) and high-risk (>0.65) LNR was 2.11 (1.49-3.00) and 3.19 (2.12-4.80), respectively, compared to low-risk LNR (≤0.20) patients (p<0.001). On the other hand, the hazard of death of pN2 and pN3 patients was 2.17 (1.42-3.30) and 2.41 (1.53-3.78), respectively (p<0.001), and the hazard of intermediate (0.21-0.65) and high-risk (>0.65) LNR patients was 1.70 (1.13-2.56) and 2.74 (1.75-4.28), respectively (p≤0.001). CONCLUSION: Higher pN and LNR were associated with shorter disease-free survival and overall survival times.
Authors: Armando E Giuliano; Kelly K Hunt; Karla V Ballman; Peter D Beitsch; Pat W Whitworth; Peter W Blumencranz; A Marilyn Leitch; Sukamal Saha; Linda M McCall; Monica Morrow Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-02-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Viviana Galimberti; Bernard F Cole; Stefano Zurrida; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Paolo Veronesi; Paola Baratella; Camelia Chifu; Manuela Sargenti; Mattia Intra; Oreste Gentilini; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Giovanni Mazzarol; Samuele Massarut; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Janez Zgajnar; Hanne Galatius; Angelo Recalcati; David Littlejohn; Monika Bamert; Marco Colleoni; Karen N Price; Meredith M Regan; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Richard D Gelber; Umberto Veronesi Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: S Eva Singletary; Craig Allred; Pandora Ashley; Lawrence W Bassett; Donald Berry; Kirby I Bland; Patrick I Borgen; Gary Clark; Stephen B Edge; Daniel F Hayes; Lorie L Hughes; Robert V P Hutter; Monica Morrow; David L Page; Abram Recht; Richard L Theriault; Ann Thor; Donald L Weaver; H Samuel Wieand; Frederick L Greene Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Miodrag Djordjevic; Aleksandar Karanikolic; Ljubinka Velickovic; Maja Milentijevic Journal: Pak J Med Sci Date: 2020 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.088
Authors: Omobolaji O Ayandipo; Gabriel O Ogun; Olalekan J Adepoju; Ebenezer O Fatunla; Adefemi O Afolabi; Peter C Osuala; Temidayo O Ogundiran Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2020-08-05
Authors: Jesse Lopes da Silva; Bruno Henrique Rala de Paula; Isabele Avila Small; Luiz Claudio Santos Thuler; Andréia Cristina de Melo Journal: Breast Cancer (Auckl) Date: 2020-09-25
Authors: Renee Cattell; Jia Ying; Lan Lei; Jie Ding; Shenglan Chen; Mario Serrano Sosa; Chuan Huang Journal: Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art Date: 2022-03-07
Authors: Danylo Rafhael Costa-Silva; Maria da Conceição Barros-Oliveira; Francisco Adelton Alves-Ribeiro; Larysse Cardoso Campos-Verdes; Elmo de Jesus Nery Junior; Samara Fernanda Vieira-Valença; Rodrigo Jose de Vasconcelos-Valença; Veronica Mendes Soares; André Luiz Pinho-Sobral; Emerson Brandão Sousa; Pedro Vitor Lopes-Costa; Alesse Ribeiro Dos Santos; Jackeline Lopes Viana; Arquimedes Cavalcante Cardoso; Victoria Maria Luz-Borges; Renato de Oliveira Pereira; Cleciton Braga Tavares; Vladimir Costa Silva; Dorival Mendes Rodrigues-Junior; Luiz Henrique Gebrim; Benedito Borges da Silva Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 1.817