| Literature DB >> 31001540 |
Karima Ait-Aissa1, James S Heisner2, Laura E Norwood Toro1, Dennis Bruemmer3, Genevieve Doyon3, Leanne Harmann1, Aron Geurts1,4, Amadou K S Camara2,4, Andreas M Beyer1,4.
Abstract
Introduction: Elevated levels of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) contribute to the development of numerous cardiovascular diseases. TERT, the catalytic subunit of telomerase, has been shown to translocate to mitochondria to suppress ROS while promoting ATP production. Acute overexpression of TERT increases survival and decreases infarct size in a mouse model of myocardial infarct, while decreased telomerase activity predisposes to mitochondrial defects and heart failure. In the present study, we examined the role of TERT on cardiac structure and function under basal conditions and conditions of acute or prolonged stress in a novel rat model of TERT deficiency.Entities:
Keywords: heart disease; ischema-reperfusion injury; mitochondia; reactive oxygen species; telomerase (TERT)
Year: 2019 PMID: 31001540 PMCID: PMC6454001 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1TERT expression and activity assessment in the TERT−/− and WT. (A) Immunohistochemistry (left panel) and western blot analysis (right panel) of TERT protein expression in heart sections from TERT−/− compared to WT and no-antibody staining as a negative control for IHC; (B) Telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay in tissue lysates from TERT−/−, WT, and WT heat inactivated samples; (C) Telomere length measurements in hearts from TERT−/− and WT rats. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. #P < 0.05 for WT inactivated vs. WT group and *P < 0.05 for TERT−/− vs. WT group.
Summary of baseline and after Ang II infusion on cardiac characteristics of TERT−/− and WT rats.
| Body weight (g) | 332.1 ± 18.2 | 308.5 ± 24.4 | ns | 212 ± 18.3 | 258.3 ± 31.8 | ns |
| Heart weight (g) | 1.38 ± 0.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | ns | 0.96 ± 0.06 | 1.09 ± 0.1 | ns |
| Heart rate (beat/min) | 186.4 ± 18.7 | 211.5 ± 19.6 | ns | 234.1 ± 4.3 | 147.8 ± 29 | 0.03 |
| Coronary flow (ml/min) | 9.5 ± 1.1 | 10.7 ± 0.5 | ns | 7.8 ± 0.9 | 6.32 ± 1.40 | ns |
| Developed LV pressure (mmHg) | 68.2 ± 9.2 | 75.1 ± 11.4 | ns | 152.8 ± 7.05 | 120 ± 8.8 | 0.02 |
| Rate pressure product (mmHg × beat/min) | 11900.8 ± 2512.9 | 14860.3 ± 3219.4 | ns | 31858.0 ± 1244.9 | 14100.0 ± 3969.9 | 0.0009 |
Figure 2Myocardial Infarct size measured in the TERT−/− and WT after global ischemia in rats with and without Ang II treatment. Infarct size expressed as percent of the area at risk (whole ventricle) in TERT−/− vs. WT without Ang II treatment (A), in TERT−/− vs. WT with Ang II treatment (B), in WT with Ang II vs. WT without Ang II treatment (C), in TERT−/− + Ang II vs. TERT−/− without Ang II treatment (D), delta infarct size for TERT−/− + Ang II vs. WT + Ang II relative to II values for each group (E) and representative images of infarct scars after global ischemia in TERT−/− and WT rats infused without (TERT−/−: n = 3 males and 5 females and WT: n = 3 males and 4 females) or with Ang II (TERT−/−: n = 2 males and 2 females and WT: n = 2 males and 4 females) (F). Values are expressed as means ± SEM. *P = 0.04 for TERT−/− +AngII vs. WT+ Ang II; #P = 0.0001 for WT +AngII vs. WT; $P = 0.0001 for TERT−/− +AngII vs. TERT−/−.
Figure 3Cardiac function before, during and after global ischemia in TERT−/− and WT without prior Ang II treatment. (A) Relative changes in CF; (B) Relative changes in NADH autofluorescence; (C) Absolute Systolic LVP (LVSP; mmHg); (D) Absolute diastolic LVP (LVDP; mmHg); (E) Dev- LVP (Difference between LVSP and LVDP) and (F) Relative changes in RPP (calculated as LVDP × HR) recorded before, during, and after 25 min no flow, global ischemia for TERT−/− (n = 3 males and 5 females) and WT (n = 3 males and 4 females) groups. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 t student test.
Figure 4Cardiac function before, during and after global ischemia in TERT−/− and WT after Ang II treatment. (A) Relative changes in CF; (B) relative changes in NADH autofluorescence; (C) absolute Systolic LVP (mmHg); (D) absolute diastolic LVP (mmHg); (E) relative changes in Dev- LVP; and (F) relative changes in RPP recorded before, during, and after 25 min no flow global ischemia for TERT−/− + Ang II (n = 2 males and 2 females) and WT + Ang II (n = 2 males and 4 females) groups. Values are expressed as means ± SEM. *P < 0.05 t student test.
Figure 5mtDNA integrity and mitochondrial respiration in TERT−/− and WT rat hearts not treated with Ang II. (A) mtDNA lesions level measured in mtDNA isolated from rat hearts; n = 5 in each group; *p = 0.04 for hearts from TERT−/− rats vs. hearts from WT. (B) Respiratory Control Index (RCI) of isolated mitochondria of fresh rat hearts in the presence of potassium pyruvate-malate (KPM) or Succinate (SUC); n = 4–5; *p = 0.043 and p = 0.042 for mitochondria from TERT−/− vs. WT hearts with SUC and KPM respectively. (C) Oxygen consumption in State 3 of isolated mitochondria of fresh rat hearts in the presence of potassium pyruvate-malate (KPM) or Succinate (SUC); n = 4–5; *p = 0.0001 and p = 0.004 for mitochondria from TERT−/− vs. WT hearts with SUC and KPM, respectively. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05 t student test and One-way ANOVA.