| Literature DB >> 31001519 |
Jing-Fan Xin1,2, Xiao-Ru Han1, Fei-Fei He1, Yi-Hong Ding1.
Abstract
Despite the great interest in energy storage application, stable neutral CnOn (n > 1) structures either in thermodynamics or kinetics have yet been largely limited due to the rather high tendency to release the very stable CO molecule. The neutral cyclopropanetrione (C3O3) cluster has long remained elusive since no isomer with sufficient kinetic stability has been found either experimentally or theoretically. In this work, we constructed the first global potential energy surface of singlet C3O3 at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ//B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ level, from which the kinetic stability of a wide range of C3O3 isomers can be determined by investigating their isomerization and fragmentation pathways. Amongst, a three-membered ring structure 01 is the global C3O3 isomer with a barrier of 10.6 kcal/mol at the sophisticated W1BD level. In particular, two carbene-type isomers 02 and 04 possess appreciable destruction barriers of 20.3 and 24.7 kcal/mol at W1BD, respectively. Thus, 02 and 04 can be useful building blocks for constructing larger high-energy density carbon-oxygen clusters. Moreover, with the carbene center, both might effectively functionalize various nano-materials while retaining the electrochemical active carbonyl and epoxyl moieties that are very desirable in alkali metal-ion batteries.Entities:
Keywords: C3O3; alkali metal-ion battery; computational study; global isomeric survey; high-energy density materials; kinetic stability; neutral cyclopropanetrione
Year: 2019 PMID: 31001519 PMCID: PMC6456661 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00193
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Scheme 1Proposed singlet C3O3 isomers in literatures with its first proposed year and characterized year. (A) C3-ring isomer. (B) C2O- ring isomer. (C) CO2- ring isomer.
RE values for singlet C3O3 isomers with respect to 3CO as well as the destruction barriers for each isomer at the CCSD(T)//B3LYP+GFEC level.
| 86.0 (83.0 | 10.3 (10.5 | ||
| 87.1 | −1.3 | ||
| 123.7 (121.8 | 17.8 (21.5 | ||
| 130.8 | 6.1 | ||
| 133.7 (132.6 | 24.3 (24.5 | ||
| 133.6 | 1.5 | ||
| 141.6 | 4.7 | ||
| 145.1 | 0.7 | ||
| 156.6 | 13.7 (14.4 | ||
| 187.5 | 13.2 (12.8 | ||
| 209.7 | 4.9 | ||
| 227.0 | 12.2 (12.0 | ||
| 237.9 | 0.5 | ||
| 240.3 | 2.6 | ||
| 250.3 | 0.5 | ||
| 249.5 | 0.9 | ||
| 261.1 | 0.9 | ||
| 267.1 | 5.4 | ||
| 268.2 | 2.9 | ||
| 269.9 | 3.0 | ||
| 285.5 | 10.3 | ||
| 288.9 | 6.9 |
The Gibbs free energy values at CBS-QB3.
The Gibbs free energy values at W1BD.
Figure 1Structural information of singlet C3O3 isomers at the B3LYP/aug-cc-pVTZ level.
Figure 2Schematic potential energy surface of singlet C3O3 at the CCSD(T)//B3LYP+GFEC level.
Scheme 2Two resonant structures of 01. (A) Cumulenic type. (B) Donor-acceptor type.