S Suthiphosuwan1,2, P Sati3, M Guenette2, X Montalban2, D S Reich3,4, A Bharatha1,5, J Oh6,4. 1. From the Division of Neuroradiology (S.S., A.B.). 2. Division of Neurology (S.S., M.G., X.M., J.O.), Department of Medicine. 3. Translational Neuroradiology Section (P.S., D.S.R.), National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. Department of Neurology (D.S.R., J.O.), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Division of Neurosurgery (A.B.), Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Division of Neurology (S.S., M.G., X.M., J.O.), Department of Medicine ohjiw@smh.ca.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiologically isolated syndrome describes asymptomatic individuals with incidental radiologic abnormalities suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that >40% of white matter lesions in MS (and often substantially more) have visible central veins on MR imaging. This "central vein sign" reflects perivenous inflammatory demyelination and can assist in differentiating MS from other white matter disorders. We therefore hypothesized that >40% of white matter lesions in cases of radiologically isolated syndrome would show the central vein sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 20 participants diagnosed with radiologically isolated syndrome after evaluation by a neurologist. We performed 3T MR imaging of the brain and cervical spinal cord. White matter lesions were analyzed for the central vein sign. RESULTS: Of 391 total white matter lesions, 292 (75%) demonstrated the central vein sign (central vein sign+). The median proportion of central vein sign+ lesions per case was 87% (range, 29%-100%). When the "40% rule" that has been proposed to distinguish MS from other disorders was applied, of 20 participants, 18 cases of radiologically isolated syndrome (90%) had ≥40% central vein sign+ lesions (range, 55%-100%). Two participants (10%) had <40% central vein sign+ lesions (29% and 31%). When the simpler "rule of 6" was applied, 19 participants (95%) met these criteria. In multivariable models, the number of spinal cord and infratentorial lesions was associated with a higher proportion of central vein sign+ lesions (P = .002; P = .06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of radiologically isolated syndrome had a high proportion of central vein sign+ lesions, suggesting that lesions in these individuals reflect perivenous inflammatory demyelination. Moreover, we found correlations between the proportion of central vein sign+ lesions and spinal cord lesions, a known risk factor for radiologically isolated syndrome progressing to MS. These findings raise the possibility, testable prospectively, that the central vein sign may have prognostic value in distinguishing patients with radiologically isolated syndrome at risk of developing clinical MS from those with white matter lesions of other etiologies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiologically isolated syndrome describes asymptomatic individuals with incidental radiologic abnormalities suggestive of multiple sclerosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that >40% of white matter lesions in MS (and often substantially more) have visible central veins on MR imaging. This "central vein sign" reflects perivenous inflammatory demyelination and can assist in differentiating MS from other white matter disorders. We therefore hypothesized that >40% of white matter lesions in cases of radiologically isolated syndrome would show the central vein sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 20 participants diagnosed with radiologically isolated syndrome after evaluation by a neurologist. We performed 3T MR imaging of the brain and cervical spinal cord. White matter lesions were analyzed for the central vein sign. RESULTS: Of 391 total white matter lesions, 292 (75%) demonstrated the central vein sign (central vein sign+). The median proportion of central vein sign+ lesions per case was 87% (range, 29%-100%). When the "40% rule" that has been proposed to distinguish MS from other disorders was applied, of 20 participants, 18 cases of radiologically isolated syndrome (90%) had ≥40% central vein sign+ lesions (range, 55%-100%). Two participants (10%) had <40% central vein sign+ lesions (29% and 31%). When the simpler "rule of 6" was applied, 19 participants (95%) met these criteria. In multivariable models, the number of spinal cord and infratentorial lesions was associated with a higher proportion of central vein sign+ lesions (P = .002; P = .06, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Most cases of radiologically isolated syndrome had a high proportion of central vein sign+ lesions, suggesting that lesions in these individuals reflect perivenous inflammatory demyelination. Moreover, we found correlations between the proportion of central vein sign+ lesions and spinal cord lesions, a known risk factor for radiologically isolated syndrome progressing to MS. These findings raise the possibility, testable prospectively, that the central vein sign may have prognostic value in distinguishing patients with radiologically isolated syndrome at risk of developing clinical MS from those with white matter lesions of other etiologies.
Authors: Tobias Granberg; Juha Martola; Maria Kristoffersen-Wiberg; Peter Aspelin; Sten Fredrikson Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Y Forslin; T Granberg; A Antwan Jumah; S Shams; P Aspelin; M Kristoffersen-Wiberg; J Martola; S Fredrikson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Pascal Sati; Jiwon Oh; R Todd Constable; Nikos Evangelou; Charles R G Guttmann; Roland G Henry; Eric C Klawiter; Caterina Mainero; Luca Massacesi; Henry McFarland; Flavia Nelson; Daniel Ontaneda; Alexander Rauscher; William D Rooney; Amal P R Samaraweera; Russell T Shinohara; Raymond A Sobel; Andrew J Solomon; Constantina A Treaba; Jens Wuerfel; Robert Zivadinov; Nancy L Sicotte; Daniel Pelletier; Daniel S Reich Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Niraj Mistry; Rasha Abdel-Fahim; Amal Samaraweera; Olivier Mougin; Emma Tallantyre; Christopher Tench; Tim Jaspan; Peter Morris; Paul S Morgan; Nikos Evangelou Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2015-12-10 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Darin T Okuda; Aksel Siva; Orhun Kantarci; Matilde Inglese; Ilana Katz; Melih Tutuncu; B Mark Keegan; Stacy Donlon; Le H Hua; Angela Vidal-Jordana; Xavier Montalban; Alex Rovira; Mar Tintoré; Maria Pia Amato; Bruno Brochet; Jérôme de Seze; David Brassat; Patrick Vermersch; Nicola De Stefano; Maria Pia Sormani; Daniel Pelletier; Christine Lebrun Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: M I Gaitán; P Yañez; M E Paday Formenti; I Calandri; E Figueiredo; P Sati; J Correale Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Ruth Ann Marrie; Mark Allegretta; Lisa F Barcellos; Bruce Bebo; Peter A Calabresi; Jorge Correale; Benjamin Davis; Philip L De Jager; Christiane Gasperi; Carla Greenbaum; Anne Helme; Bernhard Hemmer; Pamela Kanellis; Walter Kostich; Douglas Landsman; Christine Lebrun-Frenay; Naila Makhani; Kassandra L Munger; Darin T Okuda; Daniel Ontaneda; Ronald B Postuma; Jacqueline A Quandt; Sharon Roman; Shiv Saidha; Maria Pia Sormani; Jon Strum; Pamela Valentine; Clare Walton; Kathleen M Zackowski; Yinshan Zhao; Helen Tremlett Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 44.711