Mariam M AlHilli1, Paul Elson2, Lisa Rybicki2, Alok A Khorana3, Peter G Rose4. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America. Electronic address: alhillm@ccf.org. 2. Division of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America. 3. Department of Hematology Oncology, Taussig Cancer Center, United States of America. 4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine patient and facility-specific factors associated with time to surgery (TTS) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), and define the impact of delay in TTS >6 weeks on overall survival (OS) by tumor histology and stage. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients with EC who underwent definitive primary surgical treatment between 2004 and 2013. Patients were stratified by EC histology into type I (endometrioid) and type II (non-endometrioid). TTS (number of days from diagnosis to definitive surgery) was calculated and trends in TTS during the study period were analyzed. Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with TTS for patients with type I and type II EC, respectively. Cox regression was used to assess the impact of delay in TTS > 6 weeks on OS by tumor histology and stage. RESULTS: Out of 284,499 patients included in the study, 83% had type I EC and 17% had type II EC. Median (interquartile range; IQR) TTS for type I and II EC was 27 days (10-41) and 26 days (13-40), respectively. TTS increased over the study period in both groups. In Type I EC, delay in TTS was associated with worse OS in patients with early stage (I-II) EC only. In type II EC, delay in TTS had no significant impact on OS in stage I-III EC, while a paradoxical relationship between TTS > 6 weeks and improved OS was observed for stage IV EC. CONCLUSION: TTS increased over the study period. TTS >6 weeks was negatively associated with OS in early stage type I EC. Interventions to reduce TTS in specific stages and settings for EC are necessary given this impact on mortality. Published by Elsevier Inc.
OBJECTIVE: To determine patient and facility-specific factors associated with time to surgery (TTS) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC), and define the impact of delay in TTS >6 weeks on overall survival (OS) by tumor histology and stage. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried to identify patients with EC who underwent definitive primary surgical treatment between 2004 and 2013. Patients were stratified by EC histology into type I (endometrioid) and type II (non-endometrioid). TTS (number of days from diagnosis to definitive surgery) was calculated and trends in TTS during the study period were analyzed. Poisson regression was used to identify factors associated with TTS for patients with type I and type II EC, respectively. Cox regression was used to assess the impact of delay in TTS > 6 weeks on OS by tumor histology and stage. RESULTS: Out of 284,499 patients included in the study, 83% had type I EC and 17% had type II EC. Median (interquartile range; IQR) TTS for type I and II EC was 27 days (10-41) and 26 days (13-40), respectively. TTS increased over the study period in both groups. In Type I EC, delay in TTS was associated with worse OS in patients with early stage (I-II) EC only. In type II EC, delay in TTS had no significant impact on OS in stage I-III EC, while a paradoxical relationship between TTS > 6 weeks and improved OS was observed for stage IV EC. CONCLUSION:TTS increased over the study period. TTS >6 weeks was negatively associated with OS in early stage type I EC. Interventions to reduce TTS in specific stages and settings for EC are necessary given this impact on mortality. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Entities:
Keywords:
Endometrial cancer; Stage; Time to surgery; Time to treatment
Authors: Benjamin B Albright; Dimitrios Nasioudis; Stuart Craig; Haley A Moss; Nawar A Latif; Emily M Ko; Ashley F Haggerty Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-08-07 Impact factor: 8.661