Literature DB >> 31000012

1-Year Survival After TAVR of Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient and High-Gradient Aortic Valve Stenosis in Matched Study Populations.

Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat1, Matthias Renker2, Christoph Liebetrau3, Arnaud van Linden4, Mani Arsalan4, Maren Weferling5, Andreas Rolf3, Mirko Doss6, Helge Möllmann7, Thomas Walther8, Christian W Hamm3, Won-Keun Kim9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to examine whether the prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) having high versus low transvalvular mean pressure gradients (MPGs) is intrinsically different after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), even after strict matching of baseline parameters.
BACKGROUND: Patients with low MPG are characterized by higher cardiovascular risk and more comorbidities than other AS patients are.
METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center study involving 2,282 patients, 3 groups were derived according to the following criteria: 1) high-gradient AS (HG-AS) (MPG ≥40 mm Hg); 2) low-flow, low-gradient AS (LFLG-AS) (MPG <40 mm Hg, ejection fraction [EF] ≤40%, stroke volume index ≤35 ml/m2); 3) paradoxical LFLG-AS (pLFLG-AS) (similar to LFLG-AS but with EF ≥50%). Propensity score matching that included EF was used to compare 1-year survival.
RESULTS: A total of 136 patients with HG-AS or LFLG-AS were identified. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were significantly different (p = 0.039), with death occurring in 11 versus 21 patients (hazard ratio: 2.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.02 to 4.39; p = 0.044), respectively. A total of 226 patients with HG-AS or pLFLG-AS were identified and here the curves were identical (p = 0.468), with death occurring in 18 versus 21 patients (hazard ratio: 1.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.67 to 2.38; p = 0.469).
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study comparing survival after TAVR of patients with high versus low MPG in matched study populations. Mortality in patients with LFLG-AS was twice that of HG-AS patients. However, it appears that patients with pLFLG-AS might benefit from TAVR to the same extent as patients with HG-AS. There must be still unmasked factors that influence mortality of patients with LFLG-AS.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1-year survival; low-flow; low-gradient aortic stenosis; propensity score matching; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31000012     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  4 in total

1.  Predictive value of overt and non-overt volume overload in patients with high- or low-gradient aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ulrich Fischer-Rasokat; Matthias Renker; Christoph Liebetrau; Maren Weferling; Andreas Rieth; Andreas Rolf; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Christian W Hamm; Won-Keun Kim
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-10

2.  TAVI in patients with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis-short-term and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Julius Steffen; Nikolas Reißig; David Andreae; Markus Beckmann; Magda Haum; Julius Fischer; Hans Theiss; Daniel Braun; Martin Orban; Konstantinos Rizas; Sebastian Sadoni; Michael Näbauer; Sven Peterss; Jörg Hausleiter; Steffen Massberg; Simon Deseive
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Regulation and Clinical Implication of Arginine Vasopressin in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Referred to Trans-Catheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kuwahara; Teruhiko Imamura; Mitsuo Sobajima; Hiroshi Ueno; Koichiro Kinugawa
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 4.  How to deal with low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricle ejection fraction: from literature review to tips for clinical practice.

Authors:  F Contorni; M Fineschi; A Iadanza; A Santoro; G E Mandoli; M Cameli
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 4.214

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.