| Literature DB >> 30999906 |
Jelena Štšepetova1,2, Jaak Truu3, Riina Runnel4, Rita Nõmmela4, Mare Saag4, Jana Olak4, Hiie Nõlvak3, Jens-Konrad Preem3, Kristjan Oopkaup3, Kaarel Krjutškov5, Eino Honkala6, Sisko Honkala6, Kauko Mäkinen7, Pirkko-Liisa Mäkinen7, Tero Vahlberg8, Joan Vermeiren9, Douwina Bosscher9, Peter de Cock9, Reet Mändar10,11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oral microbiome has significant impact on both oral and general health. Polyols have been promoted as sugar substitutes in prevention of oral diseases. We aimed to reveal the effect of candies containing erythritol, xylitol or control (sorbitol) on salivary microbiome.Entities:
Keywords: Erythritol; Next generation sequencing; Oral microbiome; Polyol; Saliva; qPCR
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30999906 PMCID: PMC6471963 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0747-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 2.757
Clinical parameters of the study subjects (n = 90) at the end of the intervention trial (mean ± SD)
| Clinical data | Erythritol | Xylitol | Sorbitol (control) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (y) | 11.6 ± 0.62 | 11.3 ± 0.6 | 11.1 ± 0.63 |
|
|
| 2.06 ± 1.71 1 | 3.06 ± 2.18 | 3.62 ± 2.55 1 | 1 0.013 |
|
| 3.2 ± 3.63 2 | 4.37 ± 3.42 | 5.58 ± 4.50 2 | 2 0.025 |
DMFT, number of decayed, missing and filled teeth; DMFS, number of decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces
1P = 0.013 versus sorbitol
2P = 0.025 versus sorbitol
Fig. 1Relative abundance of bacterial phyla (a) and families (b) within studied groups. Groups: ery – erythritol, sorb – sorbitol, xyl – xylitol
Proportions of ten most abundant bacterial phylotypes (more than 1%) in saliva microbiomes (mean ± SD)
| OTU | Identification Greengenes | Identification HOMD 16S RefSeq | Erythritol | Xylitol | Sorbitol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Otu037 | Unclassified |
| 12.4 ± 3.4 | 9.4 ± 3.1 | 7.8 ± 2.8 |
| Otu005 | 10.8 ± 3.4 | 7.9 ± 2.8 | 8.4 ± 3.5 | ||
| Otu068 |
|
| 7.4 ± 4.1 | 7.4 ± 2.7 | 7.9 ± 3.7 |
| Otu070 | 6.5 ± 3.1 | 5.9 ± 3.2 | 6.3 ± 3.2 | ||
| Otu038 |
|
| 5.7 ± 2.7 | 5.5 ± 2 | 7.4 ± 2.8 |
| Otu009 | 6.4 ± 3.5 | 6.7 ± 3.6 | 5.2 ± 2.2 | ||
| Otu015 | 3.6 ± 2.2 | 5.5 ± 2.6 | 6.6 ± 4.9 | ||
| Otu018 | Unclassified | 2.1 ± 2.2 | 4.2 ± 3.5 | 4 ± 3.7 | |
| Otu096 |
|
| 2.3 ± 1.2 | 3.7 ± 1.9 | 3 ± 1.3 |
| Otu209 | Unclassified | 2.2 ± 1.6 | 3.3 ± 2.6 | 2.4 ± 2.2 |
Fig. 2Heat map showing the relative abundance of the most predominant genera in saliva. Row represents the relative percentage of each bacterial genus, and column stands for different samples
Average species richness and inverted Simpson index values (mean ± SD)
| Treatment groups | Species richness (number of OTUs) 1 | Inverted Simpson Index 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Erythritol | 310 ± 18 | 17.4 ± 4.9 |
| Xylitol | 301 ± 21 | 19.0 ± 3.8 |
| Sorbitol | 327 ± 20 | 20.3 ± 6.1 |
1P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA)
2P = 0.075 (one-way ANOVA)
Fig. 3Plot of principal component analysis based on Hellinger transformed OTU relative abundance values. Individual saliva microbiome samples are connected to treatment centroids. First and second principal axes describe 16.7 and 13.3% of overall variation, respectively. Abbreviations: ery - erythritol, sorb - sorbitol, xyl - xylitol
Differentially abundant genera between erythritol and sorbitol groups, and erythritol and xylitol groups based zero-inflated Gaussian mixture model
| Genus | Erythritol compared to sorbitol logFC | Erythritol compared to xylitol logFC |
|---|---|---|
|
| 0,47 | |
|
| −0,34 | |
|
| −0,36 | |
|
| −0,50 |
A negative value for fold change (logFC) indicates an increase of in the relative abundance of a particular genus in the erythritol group compared to the sorbitol or xylitol group. Statistically significant fold changes are shown in bold and followed by P value in parenthesis
Real-time PCR results: counts (log10 plasmid copies/ml saliva; mean ± SD) and prevalence (%) of total bacteria and three indicator bacteria
| Bacteria spp. | Erythritol | Xylitol | Sorbitol | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| plasmid copies/ml saliva | % | plasmid copies/ml saliva | % | plasmid copies/ml saliva | % | |
| Total bacteria | 9.8 ± 0.4 | 100 | 9.94 ± 0.3 | 100 | 9.8 ± 0.3 | 100 |
|
| 3.3 ± 1.6 | 83 | 3.6 ± 1.5 | 87 | 3.6 ± 0.96 | 97 |
|
| 0.59 ± 1.4 | 17 1 | 0.72 ± 1.5 | 20 2 | 1.17 ± 1.6 | 37 1, 2 |
|
| 1.17 ± 1.8 | 33 | 1.10 ± 2.0 | 27 | 1.35 ± 2.1 | 30 |
1P = 0.015 versus sorbitol; 2 P = 0.011 versus sorbitol
Spearman’s rank-order correlation between clinical and microbiological data. Results presented as correlation coefficient rs; p value
| Clinical data | Bacteria spp. | Presence of bacteria (rs; p) | Counts of bacteria (rs; p) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Total bacteria | NS | NS |
|
| 0.271; 0.004 | 0.308; 0.001 | |
|
| NS | NS | |
|
| NS | NS | |
|
| −0.28; 0.010 | ||
|
| 0.27; 0.012 | ||
|
| Total bacteria | NS | NS |
|
| 0.248; 0.009 | 0.306; 0.001 | |
|
| NS | NS | |
|
| NS | NS | |
|
| 0.21; 0.049 | ||
|
| 0.23; 0.039 | ||
|
| −0.30; 0.005 | ||
|
| 0.34; 0.001 |
NS – not significant
Total bacteria, S. mutans, S. sobrinus and A. actinomycetemcomitans were detected using qPCR method while other bacteria using high-throughput sequencing