Li-An Yang1, Yu-Jung Chang2, Shu-Hwa Chen1, Chung-Yen Lin1, Jan-Ming Ho1,3. 1. Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. 2. Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan. yjchang@iis.sinica.edu.tw. 3. Research Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the rapid increase in genome sequencing projects for non-model organisms, numerous genome assemblies are currently in progress or available as drafts, but not made available as satisfactory, usable genomes. Data quality assessment of genome assemblies is gaining importance not only for people who perform the assembly/re-assembly processes, but also for those who attempt to use assemblies as maps in downstream analyses. Recent studies of the quality control, quality evaluation/ assessment of genome assemblies have focused on either quality control of reads before assemblies or evaluation of the assemblies with respect to their contiguity and correctness. However, correctness assessment depends on a reference and is not applicable for de novo assembly projects. Hence, development of methods providing both post-assembly and pre-assembly quality assessment reports for examining the quality/correctness of de novo assemblies and the input reads is worth studying. RESULTS: We present SQUAT, an efficient tool for both pre-assembly and post-assembly quality assessment of de novo genome assemblies. The pre-assembly module of SQUAT computes quality statistics of reads and presents the analysis in a well-designed interface to visualize the distribution of high- and poor-quality reads in a portable HTML report. The post-assembly module of SQUAT provides read mapping analytics in an HTML format. We categorized reads into several groups including uniquely mapped reads, multiply mapped, unmapped reads; for uniquely mapped reads, we further categorized them into perfectly matched, with substitutions, containing clips, and the others. We carefully defined the poorly mapped (PM) reads into several groups to prevent the underestimation of unmapped reads; indeed, a high PM% would be a sign of a poor assembly that requires researchers' attention for further examination or improvements before using the assembly. Finally, we evaluate SQUAT with six datasets, including the genome assemblies for eel, worm, mushroom, and three bacteria. The results show that SQUAT reports provide useful information with details for assessing the quality of assemblies and reads. AVAILABILITY: The SQUAT software with links to both its docker image and the on-line manual is freely available at https://github.com/luke831215/SQUAT .
BACKGROUND: With the rapid increase in genome sequencing projects for non-model organisms, numerous genome assemblies are currently in progress or available as drafts, but not made available as satisfactory, usable genomes. Data quality assessment of genome assemblies is gaining importance not only for people who perform the assembly/re-assembly processes, but also for those who attempt to use assemblies as maps in downstream analyses. Recent studies of the quality control, quality evaluation/ assessment of genome assemblies have focused on either quality control of reads before assemblies or evaluation of the assemblies with respect to their contiguity and correctness. However, correctness assessment depends on a reference and is not applicable for de novo assembly projects. Hence, development of methods providing both post-assembly and pre-assembly quality assessment reports for examining the quality/correctness of de novo assemblies and the input reads is worth studying. RESULTS: We present SQUAT, an efficient tool for both pre-assembly and post-assembly quality assessment of de novo genome assemblies. The pre-assembly module of SQUAT computes quality statistics of reads and presents the analysis in a well-designed interface to visualize the distribution of high- and poor-quality reads in a portable HTML report. The post-assembly module of SQUAT provides read mapping analytics in an HTML format. We categorized reads into several groups including uniquely mapped reads, multiply mapped, unmapped reads; for uniquely mapped reads, we further categorized them into perfectly matched, with substitutions, containing clips, and the others. We carefully defined the poorly mapped (PM) reads into several groups to prevent the underestimation of unmapped reads; indeed, a high PM% would be a sign of a poor assembly that requires researchers' attention for further examination or improvements before using the assembly. Finally, we evaluate SQUAT with six datasets, including the genome assemblies for eel, worm, mushroom, and three bacteria. The results show that SQUAT reports provide useful information with details for assessing the quality of assemblies and reads. AVAILABILITY: The SQUAT software with links to both its docker image and the on-line manual is freely available at https://github.com/luke831215/SQUAT .
Entities:
Keywords:
Data quality assessment; Genome assembly; Genome sequencing; Non-model organisms
Authors: Alexandra Zakharova; Amanda T S Albanaz; Fred R Opperdoes; Ingrid Škodová-Sveráková; Diana Zagirova; Andreu Saura; Lˇubomíra Chmelová; Evgeny S Gerasimov; Tereza Leštinová; Tomáš Bečvář; Jovana Sádlová; Petr Volf; Julius Lukeš; Anton Horváth; Anzhelika Butenko; Vyacheslav Yurchenko Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2022-06-24
Authors: Georg Haberer; Nadia Kamal; Eva Bauer; Heidrun Gundlach; Iris Fischer; Michael A Seidel; Manuel Spannagl; Caroline Marcon; Alevtina Ruban; Claude Urbany; Adnane Nemri; Frank Hochholdinger; Milena Ouzunova; Andreas Houben; Chris-Carolin Schön; Klaus F X Mayer Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2020-07-27 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Ana Paula Jacobus; Timothy G Stephens; Pierre Youssef; Raul González-Pech; Michael M Ciccotosto-Camp; Katherine E Dougan; Yibi Chen; Luiz Carlos Basso; Jeverson Frazzon; Cheong Xin Chan; Jeferson Gross Journal: Front Microbiol Date: 2021-04-15 Impact factor: 5.640
Authors: Kristina K Gagalova; Justin G A Whitehill; Luka Culibrk; Diana Lin; Véronique Lévesque-Tremblay; Christopher I Keeling; Lauren Coombe; Macaire M S Yuen; Inanç Birol; Jörg Bohlmann; Steven J M Jones Journal: G3 (Bethesda) Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 3.154