Patricia Solomon1, Stephanie Nixon2, Virginia Bond3,4, Cathy Cameron5, Nicole Gervais1. 1. School of Rehabilitation Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada. 2. Department of Physical Therapy and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 3. Department of Global and Health Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 4. Zambart, School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia. 5. International Centre for Disability and Rehabilitation, Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
Purpose: Although relatively unknown within the field of rehabilitation, qualitative longitudinal research is ideal for rehabilitation and disability research that aims to understand health-related challenges over time. We describe the strengths and challenges of longitudinal qualitative research using two concrete examples.Materials and methods: Qualitative longitudinal research often involves in-depth interviews of participants on multiple occasions over time. Analytic approaches are complex, summarizing data both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. We present two detailed analytic approaches used in research with people living with HIV in Zambia and Canada. Results: Our experiences provide three recommendations. First, development of the initial analytic coding framework should include both inductive and deductive approaches. Second, given the large quantity of data generated through longitudinal qualitative research, it is important to proactively develop strategies for data analysis and management. Third, as retention of participants is challenging over time, we recommend the use of a consistent interviewer over the duration of the study to promote a trusting relationship.Conclusions: Longitudinal qualitative research has much to offer researchers and can provide clinicians with insights on the challenges of living with chronic and episodic disability. The flexibility in analytic approaches allows for diverse strategies to best address the rehabilitation and disability research questions and allow for insights into living with disability over time.
Purpose: Although relatively unknown within the field of rehabilitation, qualitative longitudinal research is ideal for rehabilitation and disability research that aims to understand health-related challenges over time. We describe the strengths and challenges of longitudinal qualitative research using two concrete examples.Materials and methods: Qualitative longitudinal research often involves in-depth interviews of participants on multiple occasions over time. Analytic approaches are complex, summarizing data both cross-sectionally and longitudinally. We present two detailed analytic approaches used in research with people living with HIV in Zambia and Canada. Results: Our experiences provide three recommendations. First, development of the initial analytic coding framework should include both inductive and deductive approaches. Second, given the large quantity of data generated through longitudinal qualitative research, it is important to proactively develop strategies for data analysis and management. Third, as retention of participants is challenging over time, we recommend the use of a consistent interviewer over the duration of the study to promote a trusting relationship.Conclusions: Longitudinal qualitative research has much to offer researchers and can provide clinicians with insights on the challenges of living with chronic and episodic disability. The flexibility in analytic approaches allows for diverse strategies to best address the rehabilitation and disability research questions and allow for insights into living with disability over time.
Entities:
Keywords:
HIV and disability; HIV and rehabilitation; Qualitative longitudinal research
Authors: Jennifer M Van Tiem; Heather Schacht Reisinger; Julia E Friberg; Jaime R Wilson; Lynn Fitzwater; Ralph J Panos; Jane Moeckli Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Åsa Audulv; Elisabeth O C Hall; Åsa Kneck; Thomas Westergren; Liv Fegran; Mona Kyndi Pedersen; Hanne Aagaard; Kristianna Lund Dam; Mette Spliid Ludvigsen Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2022-10-01 Impact factor: 4.612