Literature DB >> 30997761

Evaluation of Lactobacillus spp. and yeast based probiotic (Lavipan) supplementation for the reduction of Salmonella Enteritidis after infection of broiler chickens.

M Smialek1, E Kaczorek2, E Szczucińska2, S Burchardt3, J Kowalczyk1, B Tykałowski1, A Koncicki1.   

Abstract

The number of human cases of salmonellosis in the EU was 94,625 in 2015. Considering the source of these infections, Salmonella spp. was most frequently detected in broiler chicken meat and Salmonella Enteritidis (SE) was the most commonly reported serovar. The efficacy of probiotics in limiting Salmonella spp. infection in poultry has been demonstrated in numerous papers. The administration of probiotics at the level of primary production reduces the risk of contamination of poultry food products with Salmonella spp. A study was carried out in order to determine the potential for reducing the Salmonella spp. population in broiler chickens with the use of the Lavipan (JHJ, Poland) probiotic that comprised selected stains of lactic acid bacteria and Saccharomyces cervisae. Salmonella spp.-free broiler chickens were divided into two groups and received the same feed with (group L) or without (group C) the probiotic throughout the experiment. All day-old chickens were infected per os with SE. Samples of cecum content were collected 2, 4, and 6 weeks after SE infection and pectoral muscles were collected 6 weeks following SE infection for the evaluation of the SE population number. Serum samples for serological examinations were collected 6 weeks after infection. Six weeks after infection, the number of SE-positive cecal samples was lower in the L group (12.5% positive) in comparison to the C group (87.5%). Similar results were demonstrated for the muscle samples (25% in contrast to 87.5%). At the same time, in both cases, the SE CFU/g was significantly lower in the L group. The results of our study indicate that Lavipan was capable of reducing the population of SE in the gastrointestinal tract, which eventually improved the hygienic parameters of the pectoral muscles. Four weeks after infection, SE was not detected in any of the experimental groups. In both groups, no specific anti-SE antibodies were detected. Copyright© by the Polish Academy of Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Salmonella Enteritidis; chicken; probiotic; serological response

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30997761     DOI: 10.24425/pjvs.2018.125616

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pol J Vet Sci        ISSN: 1505-1773            Impact factor:   0.821


  3 in total

1.  Safety of bivalent live attenuated Salmonella vaccine and its protection against bacterial shedding and tissue invasion in layers challenged with Salmonella.

Authors:  Chen-Si Lin; Tsung-Lin Lu; Yi-An Chen; Hsin-Yi Yu; Chiu-Yi Wu; Wen-Yuan Yang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  Differences in caecal microbiota composition and Salmonella carriage between experimentally infected inbred lines of chickens.

Authors:  Anaïs Cazals; Jordi Estellé; Nicolas Bruneau; Jean-Luc Coville; Pierrette Menanteau; Marie-Noëlle Rossignol; Deborah Jardet; Claudia Bevilacqua; Andrea Rau; Bertrand Bed'Hom; Philippe Velge; Fanny Calenge
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Probiotic Lactobacilli Do Not Protect Chickens against Salmonella Enteritidis Infection by Competitive Exclusion in the Intestinal Tract but in Feed, Outside the Chicken Host.

Authors:  Helena Juricova; Jitka Matiasovicova; Marcela Faldynova; Alena Sebkova; Tereza Kubasova; Hana Prikrylova; Daniela Karasova; Magdalena Crhanova; Hana Havlickova; Ivan Rychlik
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.