Literature DB >> 3099730

Comparison of quantitative microbiology and histopathology in divided burn-wound biopsy specimens.

A T McManus, S H Kim, W F McManus, A D Mason, B A Pruitt.   

Abstract

We examined the association between quantitative microbiologic results and histopathologic findings in divided biopsy specimens from 200 burned patients. Microbiologic counts were determined as log10 colony-forming units per gram of disrupted tissue. Histopathologic results were scored on a scale of 1 to 6, values of 4 or greater indicating microbial invasion of viable tissue. Agreement of 96.1% was found between negative cultures, arbitrarily identified as those with fewer than 5 logs/g, and histologic absence of invasive infection. In sharp contrast, however, histologic invasion occurred in only 36% of specimens with positive cultures. Though low tissue counts are essentially synonymous with negative histologic findings, quantitative microbiology is not a diagnostic substitute for histologic examination, since high tissue counts quite commonly do not indicate invasion. The principal value of quantitative burn-wound biopsies is the demonstration of predominant burn-wound flora.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3099730     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1987.01400130080012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  10 in total

1.  [Not Available].

Authors:  Jf Arnould; R Le Floch
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2015-03-31

Review 2.  Are quantitative bacterial wound cultures useful?

Authors:  George Kallstrom
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Laboratory diagnosis of invasive candidiasis.

Authors:  J M Jones
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  The renaissance man of burn surgery: Basil A. Pruitt, Jr.

Authors:  Karel D Capek; Guillermo Foncerrada; R Patrick Clayton; Michaela Sljivich; Charles D Voigt; Gabriel Hundeshagen; Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Craig Porter; Ashley Guillory; David N Herndon
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.313

Review 5.  Burn wound infections.

Authors:  Deirdre Church; Sameer Elsayed; Owen Reid; Brent Winston; Robert Lindsay
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  The changing epidemiology of infection in burn patients.

Authors:  B A Pruitt; A T McManus
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Fungal wound infection (not colonization) is independently associated with mortality in burn patients.

Authors:  Edward E Horvath; Clinton K Murray; George M Vaughan; Kevin K Chung; Duane R Hospenthal; Charles E Wade; John B Holcomb; Steven E Wolf; Arthur D Mason; Leopoldo C Cancio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Fungal colonisation in burn wounds: An Indian scenerio.

Authors:  Navin Kumar Goyal; Madhuri A Gore; R S Goyal
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 0.656

9.  Quantitation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in wound biopsy samples: from bacterial culture to rapid 'real-time' polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  J P Pirnay; D De Vos; L Duinslaeger; P Reper; C Vandenvelde; P Cornelis; A Vanderkelen
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-07-07       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Protocol for a systematic review of quantitative burn wound microbiology in the management of burns patients.

Authors:  Johnny Kwei; Fenella D Halstead; Janine Dretzke; Beryl A Oppenheim; Naiem S Moiemen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.