| Literature DB >> 30996428 |
Kinga Samborska1, Lovisa Eliasson2, Agata Marzec1, Jolanta Kowalska3, Dariusz Piotrowski1, Andrzej Lenart1, Hanna Kowalska1.
Abstract
Osmotic dehydration (OD) of apples caused a reduction of normalized water content (NWC) and an increase of normalized solids gain (NSG), independently of the kind of osmotic solution. The use of 22°Brix osmotic solutions with the addition of fruit concentrates or bilberry extract resulted in only slight reduction in the NWC in the samples, i.e. by about 15 and 20%, respectively after 6 and 24 h, against a value up to 80% in case of 65°Brix use. Similarly, larger NSG was achieved at higher solution concentrations, but the differences were smaller. In the case of the use of 80% bilberry press cake extract the NSG was very low but NWC was relatively high. Such a low concentration of slightly concentrated fruit juices is not effective for dehydration of apples, but it may be sufficient to enrich the fruit with the desired colorants. This higher concentration of osmotic solution and a larger addition, especially of the concentrate of chokeberry juice, significantly affected the color changes of dehydrated apples. The apple dehydrated in mixture of 65°Brix sucrose and 15% chokeberry juice concentrate solution exhibited the highest sensory parameters. The addition of berry fruit juices and extract was able to improve the apple sensory quality after 24 h OD in comparison with sucrose solution. Ethanol extract was a good osmotic agent, but not accepted due to taste and overall quality. However, the addition of the extract can be successfully used in conjunction with a sugar solution.Entities:
Keywords: Apple; Bilberry juice; By-product; Chokeberry juice; Ethanol bilberry extract; Peleg’s model
Year: 2019 PMID: 30996428 PMCID: PMC6443819 DOI: 10.1007/s13197-019-03658-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0022-1155 Impact factor: 2.701
Fig. 1The effect of OD on normalised water content NWC and solids gain NSG in osmo-dehydrated apples by various solutions as in Table 1 and by fitting of Peleg’s model
Effect of the solution type, concentration and the addition of berry juices or extract to sucrose solution on the color parameters of osmodehydrated apples
| Mass transfer | Color parameters | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| S—sucrose solution, C—chokeberry juice, B—bilberry juice, Ex—bilberry extract, S65-C, S65-B, S65-Ex—mixture of sucrose solution and chokeberry juice, bilberry juice, bilberry extract, respectively | ||||||||||||||||
| S22 | b | ab | a | b | b | a | c | b | ||||||||
| C22 | b | ab | b | c | a | c | b | b | ||||||||
| B22 | b | b | c | a | a | b | b | c | ||||||||
| Ex | b | a | d | a | c | b | a | c | ||||||||
| S65-C | a | d | e | d | d | d | a | a | ||||||||
| S65-B | a | cd | f | a | e | a | d | a | ||||||||
| S65-Ex | a | cd | g | e | f | a | e | a | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| 22°Brix | a | ab | a | b | a | a | a | a | ||||||||
| 65°Brix | b | d | b | a | b | b | b | b | ||||||||
| Ex | a | a | a | a | c | a | c | a | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| 0% | a | d | a | a | a | a | a | a | ||||||||
| 5% | c | cd | b | b | b | b | b | b | ||||||||
| 15% | b | cd | c | c | c | b | c | b | ||||||||
Average values were used, standard deviation ranged up to around 5%
a, b, c—homogenous group
p < 0.05
Fig. 2Changes in color lightness (L*) depending on normalized water content NWC for osmo-dehydrated apples by various solutions (coded as in Table 1): a 22°Brix (S22) and 65°Brix (S65) sucrose solution; b 22°Brix chokeberry juice (Ch22) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose and 5 (S65–Ch5) or 15% (S65–Ch15) addition of the juice concentrate; c 80% ethanol extract from bilberry press cake (Ex) and 65°Brix sucrose solution and 5 (S65–Ex) or 15% (S65–Ex15) addition of the extract; d 22°Brix bilberry juice (B22) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–B5) or 15% (S65–B15) addition of the juice. Average values were used, standard deviation ranged up to around 5%
Fig. 3Changes in a*, b* and h indicators of osmo-dehydrated apples (coded as in Table 1): a 22°Brix (S22) and 65°Brix (S65) sucrose solution; b 22°Brix chokeberry juice (Ch22) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–Ch5) or 15% (S65–Ch15) addition of the juice concentrate; c 80% ethanol extract from bilberry press cake (Ex) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–Ex5) or 15% (S65–Ex15) addition of the extract; d 22°Brix bilberry juice (B22) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–B5) or 15% (S65–B15) addition of the juice. Average values were used, standard deviation ranged up to around 5%
Fig. 4Chroma (C) and total color change (ΔE) of osmo-dehydrated apples (coded as in Table 1): a, e 22°Brix (S22) and 65°Brix (S65) sucrose solution; b, f 22°Brix chokeberry juice (Ch22) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–Ch5) or 15% (S65–Ch15) addition of the juice concentrate; c, g 80% ethanol extract from bilberry press cake (Ex) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–Ex) or 15% (S65–Fx15) addition of the extract; d, h 22°Brix bilberry juice (B22) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–B5) or 15% (S65–B15) addition of the juice. The ΔE of samples was calculated with reference to the fresh apple tissue
Fig. 5Sensory properties of osmo-dehydrated apples (coded as in Table 1): a 22°Brix (S22) and 65°Brix (S65) sucrose solution; b 22°Brix chokeberry juice (Ch22) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–Ch5) or 15% (S65–Ch15) addition of the juice concentrate; c 80% ethanol extract from bilberry press cake (Ex) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–Ex) or 15% (S65–Fx15) addition of the extract; d 22°Brix bilberry juice (B22) and 65°Brix mixture of sucrose solution and 5 (S65–B5) or 15% (S65–B15) addition of bilberry juice. Diagram PCA: e in a plane factors, f for osmo-dehydrated apple for 24 h by various solutions (as in Table 1); the arrows indicate the directions of changes in PC 1 or PC 2 values depend on solution concentrates or higher proportion of juices or extract addition. Average values were used, standard deviation ranged up to around 5%