| Literature DB >> 30996275 |
Hao Liu1, Zhen Liu2,3, Chi-Wai Man4,3, Jing Guo5, Xiao Han2,3, Zongshan Hu4,3, Tzi Bun Ng6, Zhihui Zhao2,3, Jie Li2,3, Weijun Wang2,3, Tseng-Chang Chun2,3, Jun Qiao2,3, Benlong Shi2,3, Leilei Xu2,3, Hongda Bao2,3, Qing Jiang7, Tsz Ping Lam4,3, Jack Chun Yiu Cheng4,3, Yong Qiu2,3, Zezhang Zhu8,9.
Abstract
It is well-documented that melatonin deficiency has been linked to the etiopathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In this study, we intended to apply melatonin in melatonin-deficient mice to ascertain whether melatonin could reduce the incidence/severity of scoliosis, and investigate the role of melatonin on bone mineral density in scoliosis. A total of 80 mice were divided into 4 groups: 20 quadrupedal mice and 20 bipedal mice served as controls; 20 quadrupedal and 20 bipedal mice received oral melatonin (8 mg/kg BW) daily. After 5th, 10th, 15th and 20th weeks of treatment, radiographs and in vivo micro-CT were used to determine the incidence of scoliosis and bone qualities, respectively. Upon sacrifice, the levels of melatonin were measured in each group. At 20th week, the occurrence of scoliosis was 80%, 30%, 22% and 5% in bipedal, quadrupedal, bipedal + melatonin and quadrupedal + melatonin group, respectively. The trabecular bone quality of the vertebral body was significantly ameliorated in the melatonin-treated bipedal models. Likewise, the number of osteoclasts was significantly less in those treated with melatonin. Our results indicated that melatonin deficiency may be crucial for scoliotic development, and restoration of melatonin levels can prevent scoliotic development with the improvement in bone density.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30996275 PMCID: PMC6470154 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42467-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Changes in body weight in the four groups of mice throughout the course of the experiment. The differences in body weight of the bipedal mice (BP) (n = 20), quadrupedal mice (QP) (n = 20), bipedal (BP + MLT) (n = 18) and quadrupedal mice (QP + MLT) (n = 19) throughout the 5 months.
Distribution of curve incidences and serum melatonin level among the four groups at 20th week.
| Groups | BP (Group 1) | BP + MLT (Group 2) | QP (Group 3) | QP + MLT (Group 4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 20 | 18 | 20 | 19 |
| Peripheral serum MT level (pg/ml) | 6.4 ± 4.7§§ | 193.6 ± 78.4** | 4.9 ± 3.1※※ | 219.2 ± 65.9‡‡ |
All data represent mean ± SD.
§§Indicates a significant difference between BP and QP + MLT group, P < 0.01.
**Indicates a significant difference between BP and BP + MLT group, P < 0.01.
※※Indicates a significant difference between QP and BP + MLT group, P < 0.01.
‡‡Indicates a significant difference between QPand QP + MLT group, P < 0.01.
Figure 23D characteristics of spine in each group. (A) Severe scoliosis in a bipedal mouse (n = 20). It clearly showed scoliosis with right convexity and dissymmetry of thoracic cage. (B) A straight spine without vertebral rotation in a bipedal mouse after melatonin treatment (n = 18). It showed straight spine and symmetry of thoracic cage. (C) Mild scoliosis of spine in quadrupedal group (n = 20). Helical 3D-CT showed mild asymmetry of thoracic cage. (D) A straight spine without vertebral rotation in a quadrupedal mouse after melatonin treatment (n = 19).
Incidence of scoliosis in the four groups at 20th week.
| Groups | BP (Group 1) | BP + MLT (Group 2) | QP (Group 3) | QP + MLT (Group 4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 W | 10% (2/20) | 5% (1/20) | 5% (1/20) | 0% (0/20) |
| T:2 | T:1 | TL:1 | ||
| 10 W | 50% (10/20) | 10%* (2/20) | 25% (5/20) | 5% (1/20) |
| T:3 TL:7 | T:1 TL:1 | T:2 TL:3 | TL:1 | |
| 15 W | 80% (16/20) | 21.1%** (4/19) | 30%§§ (6/20) | 5.3% (1/19) |
| T:6 TL:10 | T:2 TL:2 | T:2 TL:4 | TL:1 | |
| 20 W | 90% (18/20) | 22.2%** (4/18) | 35%§§ (6/20) | 5.3% (1/19) |
| T:7 TL:11 | T2: TL:2 | T:2 TL:4 | TL:1 |
T: thoracic TL: thoracolumbar.
*Indicates a significant difference between BP and BP + MLT group, P < 0.05.
**Indicates a significant difference between BP and BP + MLT group, P < 0.01.
§§Indicates a significant difference between BP and QP group, P < 0.01.
Figure 3Changes in Magnitude of Cobb Angle throughout the course of the experiment in the 4 groups.
Figure 4Micro-CT analysis of Trabecular bone architecture.
Figure 5Representative in vivo CT images of the fifth lumbar vertebra in each group. (A) Bipedal mouse (n = 20), (B) bipedal mouse with melatonin treatment (n = 18), (C) quadrupedal mouse (n = 20) and (D) quadrupedal mouse with melatonin treatment (n = 19). The cancellous bone from bipedal mouse (A) and quadrupedal mouse (C) without melatonin treatmentshowed rod-like trabeculae with disconnected irregular surfaces, while cancellous bone frombipedal mouse and quadrupedal mousetreated with melatonin (B,D) had plate-like trabeculae that were markedly increased, thickened and interconnected.
Figure 6The number of osteoclasts in each group. Note the decreased number of osteoclasts in the BP + MLT and QP + MLT group (B,D) compared with the BP and QP goup (A,C). The osteoclasts were stained red. The form and alignment of the chondrocytes were uniform (TRAP stain, Scale bars, 100 um).