| Literature DB >> 30996165 |
Ken Kitajima1, Kanta Fujimi1,2, Takuro Matsuda2, Masaomi Fujita2, Kouji Kaino2, Reiko Teshima2, Yuki Ujifuku2, Tomoe Horita3, Maaya Sakamoto1, Tadaaki Arimura1, Yuhei Shiga1, Etsuji Shiota2, Shin-Ichiro Miura1.
Abstract
Objective Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves the mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Even in elderly patients with CVD, CR may improve the activities of daily living (ADL). Methods Eighty-eight outpatients over 65 years of age at the beginning of a CR program (baseline) at Fukuoka University Hospital who had CVD and could be followed-up for up to 5 years were enrolled. CVD included ischemic heart disease, postoperative valvular heart disease, dissecting aneurysm of the aorta and peripheral artery disease. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the average estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline (55.4±14.8 mL/min/1.73 m2): high (≥55.4, n=44) and low (<55.4, n=44)-eGFR groups. The anaerobic threshold (AT) during exercise and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured by cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) and ultrasound cardiography, respectively. The serum brain natriuretic protein (BNP) was also measured every year. Results The average age at baseline in all patients was 73±6 years. In all patients, the level of eGFR did not significantly change for 5 years (55±15 mL/min/1.73 m2 at baseline vs. 48±14 at the end of the study). The AT (3.7±1.0 METs at baseline vs. 3.3±0.5), LVEF (57±13% vs. 64±10%) and BNP (260±452 pg/mL vs. 308±345) were also maintained for 5 years. In both the low- and high-eGFR groups, the eGFR, AT during exercise, LVEF and BNP at the end of the study were not significantly changed compared to the baseline values, although some changes were observed during the follow-up period. Conclusion Long-term CR in CVD outpatients over 65 years of age helped maintain the AT, LVEF, BNP and eGFR for 5 years. CR afforded cardio-renal protection in elderly patients with CVD.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation; cardio-renal protection; elderly patients
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30996165 PMCID: PMC6709314 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.2281-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Intern Med ISSN: 0918-2918 Impact factor: 1.271
Figure.The eGFR (A), exercise capacity at AT by CPX (B), serum BNP (C) and EF by ultrasound echocardiography (D) as cardio-renal parameters. Data are presented as the mean±SD. *p<0.05 vs. 0 year, s #p<0.05 vs. the low-eGFR group. The numbers in parentheses indicate the number of patients per year. eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, AT: anaerobic threshold, CPX: cardiopulmonary exercise test, BNP: brain natriuretic peptide, EF: ejection fraction, SD: standard deviation
Patient Characteristics at Baseline in All Patients, the Low- and High-eGFR Groups.
| All | Low-eGFR | High-eGFR | p value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, year | 73±6 | 74±6 | 72±5 | 0.15 | ||||
| Observation periods, year | 3.2±1.8 | 3.5±1.9 | 3.0±1.7 | 0.12 | ||||
| Gender (male), n (%) | 52 (59) | 33 (75) | 19 (43) | 0.002 | ||||
| Smoking, n (%) | 33 (38) | 20 (45) | 13 (30) | 0.86 | ||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | 24±4 | 24±4 | 23±4 | 0.19 | ||||
| HTN, n (%) | 74 (84) | 38 (86) | 36 (82) | 0.56 | ||||
| DM, n (%) | 28 (32) | 16 (36) | 12 (27) | 0.36 | ||||
| DL, n (%) | 72 (82) | 36 (82) | 36 (82) | 1.00 | ||||
| CKD, n (%) | 55 (63) | 44 (100) | 7 (16) | <0.001 | ||||
| CVD | ||||||||
| IHD, n (%) | 47 (53) | 28 (64) | 19 (43) | 0.05 | ||||
| HF, n (%) | 59 (67) | 29 (66) | 30 (68) | 0.82 | ||||
| Valvular disease, n (%) | 29 (33) | 14 (32) | 15 (34) | 0.82 | ||||
| PAD, n (%) | 17 (19) | 10 (23) | 7 (16) | 0.41 | ||||
| Others, n (%) | 20 (23) | 12 (27) | 8 (18) | 0.31 | ||||
| Medications | ||||||||
| ARB/ACE-I, n (%) | 55 (63) | 30 (68) | 25 (57) | 0.27 | ||||
| Diuretics, n (%) | 28 (32) | 15 (34) | 13 (30) | 0.26 | ||||
| Furosemide, n (%) | 16 (17) | 8 (18) | 8 (18) | 1.00 | ||||
| Azosemide, n (%) | 4 (4.5) | 3 (6.8) | 1 (2.3) | 0.17 | ||||
| Torasemide, n (%) | 1 (1.1) | 1 (2.3) | 0 (0) | 1.00 | ||||
| Hydrochlorothiazide, n (%) | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.3) | 1.00 | ||||
| Trichlormethiazide, n (%) | 2 (1.1) | 1 (2.3) | 1 (2.3) | 1.00 | ||||
| Spironolactone, n (%) | 15 (17) | 7 (16) | 8 (18) | 0.10 | ||||
| Eplerenone, n (%) | 4 (4.5) | 3 (6.8) | 1 (2.3) | 0.17 | ||||
| Tolvaptan, n (%) | 1 (1.1) | 0 (0) | 1 (2.3) | 1.00 | ||||
| β-blocker, n (%) | 54 (61) | 31 (70) | 23 (52) | 0.08 | ||||
| CCB, n (%) | 44 (50) | 24 (55) | 20 (45) | 0.39 | ||||
| Statin, n (%) | 62 (50) | 32 (77) | 30 (68) | 0.64 |
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, BMI: body mass index, HTN: hypertension, DM: diabetes mellitus, DL: dyslipidemia, CVD: cardiovascular disease, IHD: ischemic heart disease, HF: heart failure, PAD: peripheral artery disease, ARB/ACE-I: angiotensin II receptor blocker/angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, CCB: calcium channel blocker
Clinical Data from All Patients, the Low- and High-eGFR Groups.
| All | Low-eGFR | High-eGFR | p value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eGFR at starting CR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 55±15 | 43±9 | 68±8 | <0.001 | ||||
| AT at starting CR (METs) | 3.7±1.0 | 3.7±1.1 | 3.7±0.9 | 0.200 | ||||
| BNP at starting CR (pg/mL) | 279±473 | 288±361 | 229±538 | 0.274 | ||||
| LVEF at starting CR (%) | 57±13 | 56±13 | 57±13 | 0.453 | ||||
| CVD events after starting CR, n (%) | 14 (16) | 9 (21) | 6 (14) | 0.500 | ||||
| Withdrawal patients after starting CR, n (%) | 21 (24) | 11(25) | 10 (23) | 0.622 |
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, CR: cardiac rehabilitation, AT: anaerobic threshold, METs: metabolic equivalents, BNP: brain natriuretic peptide, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, CVD: cardiovascular diseases