In Japan, it is possible to generate chimeric animals from specified embryos by combining animal blastocysts with human pluripotent stem (PS) cells (animal-human PS chimera). However, the production of animal-human PS chimeras has been restricted because of ethical concerns, such as the development of human-like intelligence and formation of humanized gametes in the animals, owing to the contributions of human PS cells to the brain and reproductive organs. To solve these problems, we established a novel blastocyst complementation technology that does not contribute to the gametes or the brain. First, we established GFP-expressing mouse embryonic stem cells (G-mESCs) in which the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes were knocked out and generated chimeric mice by injecting them into PDX-1-deficient blastocysts. The results showed that the G-mESCs did not contribute to the formation of gametes and the brain. Therefore, in the PDX-1-deficient mice complemented by G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes, the germline was not transmitted to the next generations. This approach could address concerns regarding the development of both human gametes and a human-like brain upon mouse blastocyst complementation using human stem cells.
In Japan, it is possible to generate chimeric animals from specified embryos by combining animal blastocysts with human pluripotent stem (PS) cells (animal-human PS chimera). However, the production of animal-human PS chimeras has been restricted because of ethical concerns, such as the development of human-like intelligence and formation of humanized gametes in the animals, owing to the contributions of human PS cells to the brain and reproductive organs. To solve these problems, we established a novel blastocyst complementation technology that does not contribute to the gametes or the brain. First, we established GFP-expressing mouse embryonic stem cells (G-mESCs) in which the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes were knocked out and generated chimeric mice by injecting them into PDX-1-deficient blastocysts. The results showed that the G-mESCs did not contribute to the formation of gametes and the brain. Therefore, in the PDX-1-deficient mice complemented by G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes, the germline was not transmitted to the next generations. This approach could address concerns regarding the development of both human gametes and a human-like brain upon mouseblastocyst complementation using human stem cells.
Blastocyst complementation is a biological technique used to complement genetically
deficient organs or tissues by microinjecting stem cells into blastocyst-stage embryos of
organogenesis-disabled mice. The first report of this technique described the
complementation of T- and B-lymphocytes in Rag-deficient
(Rag2−/−) mice by microinjecting intact mouse embryonic stem
cells (mESCs) into blastocyst-stage embryos [4]. More
recently, Kobayashi et al. (2010) succeeded in generating interspecific
chimeras, namely PDX1-deficientmice with rat pancreata [13]. Additionally, rat ESCs injected into mouseblastocysts differentiated into
rat spermatozoa in nude mice [11]. These studies
demonstrate that blastocyst complementation is effective for generating three-dimensional
and functional cells or organs in vivo. To build on this previous work, we
aimed to regenerate of various organs via blastocyst complementation using human ES/iPS
cells.By injecting human pluripotent stem (PS) cells into chicken [6] and mouseblastocysts [13], groups in
the US and Israel have successfully developed chimeric embryos. In Japan, it is possible to
generate chimeras from specified embryos by combining animal blastocysts with human PS cells
(animal-human PS chimera). However, the regulations regarding the production of animal-human
PS chimeras are extremely strict, as human PS cells may form gametes or become incorporated
into the brain. Therefore, the Japanese government is apprehensive that this may lead to
human-like intelligence in animals or that they may form human spermatozoa and oocytes,
though the study on development of animal-human PS chimera was lifted on March 1, 2019.PRDM14 is a sequence-specific transcriptional regulator that plays key roles in promoting
primordial germ cell specification and safeguarding the pluripotency of mESCs [17]. During mouse embryogenesis, the
Prdm14 gene is expressed in preimplantation embryos, where its asymmetric
expression promotes the allocation of cells toward various functions in the pluripotent
inner cell mass [3]. PRDM14 deficiency in mice results
in sterility associated with early germ cell deficiency, as cells allocated to become
primordial germ cells fail to reacquire the expression of key pluripotency factors in order
to undergo epigenetic reprogramming [25].The Otx2 gene is a homeobox gene expressed in the rostral brain regions
and is thought to define the anterior regions of the embryo [1]. Otx2 homozygous mutants exhibit defects of the earliest OTX2
functions in the visceral endoderm, and heterozygous mutants show defects of their cephalic
neural crest cells [18]. Additionally, knockout of
Otx2 resulted in the failure of the brain to form properly in the embryo
[22].Recently, gene targeting using the CRISPR/Cas9 system has become established as a means of
simply editing mouse genomic DNA [5, 9]. Thus, we hypothesized that blastocyst complementation
using human ES/iPS cells that lack the Prdm14 and Otx2
genes may address the concerns regarding blastocyst complementation in Japan. Therefore, we
conducted experiments confirming that mESCs having CRISPR/Cas9-induced deletions of both
Prdm14 and Otx2 genes do not contribute to either the
gametes or the brain when used for pancreatic (PDX1-deficient) blastocyst
complementation.
Materials and Methods
Culture of mESCs
Undifferentiated donor GFP-expressing mESCs (G-mESCs) were purchased from the Center for
Developmental Biology, RIKEN (Kobe, Japan), and maintained on gelatin-coated dishes with
feeder cells in DMEM (Cat No. 10829018, Gibco, Ireland) with 10% KnockOutTM
Serum Replacement (Cat No 10828-028, Gibco), 0.1 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Cat No. 60-24-2,
Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids (Cat No. 11140050,
Gibco), and 1,000 units/ml of mouseleukemia inhibitory factor (Cat No. ESG1107, Chemicon,
Temecula, CA, USA).
Gene targeting by CRISPR/Cas9
MousePrdm14 and Otx2 genomic clones were isolated from
the C57BL/6JJcl strain mouse genomic clone library. PRDM14 CRISPR/Cas9KO plasmid (h) (Cat
No. sc-404426, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) was used for gene targeting. The
targeting vector (Cat No. sc-404426-HDR; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was modified as
follows. Gene targeting constructs of Prdm14 were generated in a vector
containing mouse Pgk promoter-neomycin, which was substituted for the exon 2 coding region
of the Prdm14 gene (Fig. 1A). 5 × 106 G-mESCs were electroporated with 15 µg of
linearized targeting construct in 100 µl solution V (Nucleofector Kit,
Lonza, Tokyo, Japan) and one pulse of 800 V/3 µF with an Amaxa
Nucleofector I (Lonza). G-mESCs were then subjected to positive selection with 250
µg/ml neomycin (Cat No. 10131035, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham,
MA, USA). After 7–10 days, 83 clones were isolated and screened for the presence of the
targeted allele. The presence of the correct homologous recombination was confirmed by
Southern blotting using a neomycin inner probe (5’-GATCGGCCATTGAACAAGAT-3’ and
5’-CTCGTCCTGCAGTTCATTCA-3’) (Fig. 1B).
Additionally, PCR screening was performed using genotyping primers
(5’-TCCTGCCTCGGGTTCACCTA-3’ [forward], 5’-CCAACCTCAGGTCGTCCTCC-3’ [reverse], and
5’-CCTTGCTCTGGTCAACCAGGTT-3’ [Neo]) to exclude heterozygote clones. After the
establishment of PRDM14-deficient G-mESCs, gene targeting of Otx2 was
also performed by CRISPR/Cas9. An OTX2 CRISPR/Cas9KO plasmid (Cat No. sc-422085, Santa
Cruz Biotechnology) was used for gene targeting. The targeting vector (Cat No.
sc-422085-HDR, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was modified as follows. Gene targeting
constructs of Otx2 were generated in the vector containing Mc1
promoter-puromycin, which was substituted for the exon 4 coding region of the
Otx2 gene (Fig. 1C). 5 ×
106 G-mESCs without Prdm14 gene were electroporated with 15
µg of linearized targeting construct under the same conditions as used
previously. G-mESCs were then subjected to positive selection with 2
µg/ml puromycin (Cat No. 10131035, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA,
USA). After 7–10 days, 51 clones were isolated and screened for the presence of the
targeted allele. After targeting of the Otx2 gene, the occurrence of the
correct homologous recombination was confirmed by Southern blotting using a puromycin
inner probe (5’-ACAGATGGAAGGCCTCCTG-3’ and 5’-GCTCGTAGAAGGGGAGGTTG-3’) (Fig. 1D). Additionally, PCR screening was performed
using genotyping primers (5’- ATCTGCAACTCCTTTAAAAG-3’ [forward],
5’-AATGCTCTGTGGCACTCGGC-3’ [reverse], and 5’- CCGGCTGGATGATCCTCCAG-3’ [Puro]) to exclude
heterozygote clones. Then, Prdm14 and Otx2 gene
double-knockout G-mESCs were established (Fig.
1E). The number of chromosomes was determined in 50 cells from each of these
original G-mESCs, in accordance with the protocol of Sugawara et al.
(2006) [20]. The results indicated that 80–90% of
the G-mESCs had the correct number (Fig. 1F).
Therefore, these G-mESCs were used to generate chimeras (Fig. 1G), which were Pdx1−/− mice
complemented by G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and Otx2
genes (PPOmice).
Fig. 1.
Targeting of Prdm14 and Otx2 genes. A. Schematic
representation of the Prdm14 gene and targeting strategy. The
red-colored bar indicates the position of the probe for genomic Southern blot
analysis using SmaI and BamHI digested samples (mutated allele, 3,730 bp; wild-type
allele, 5,750 bp). B. Genomic DNA from ES cells was digested with SmaI and BamHI and
subjected to hybridization with the probe. Lane 1, markers; Lanes 2–5, wild type;
Lanes 6, gene-targeted ES clones; Lane 7, wild type; Lane 8, none; Lane 9,
gene-targeted ES clones; Lane 10, wild type; Lane 11, gene-targeted ES clones. C.
Schematic representation of the Otx2 gene and secondary targeting
strategy. The red-colored bar indicates the position of the probe for genomic
Southern blot analysis using EcoRV and ScaI digested samples (mutated allele, 4,041
bp; wild-type allele, 6,728 bp). D. Genomic DNA from ES cells was digested with
EcoRV and ScaI and subjected to hybridization with the probe. Lane 1, markers; Lanes
2 and 3, gene-targeted ES clones; Lane 4, wild type; Lane 5, gene-targeted ES clone.
E. Establishment of ES cells without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes. Scale bars represent 200 µm. F.
Chromosome banding of the ES cells without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes. Scale bars represent 50 µm. G.
Chimeric mice generated from the ES cells without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes.
Targeting of Prdm14 and Otx2 genes. A. Schematic
representation of the Prdm14 gene and targeting strategy. The
red-colored bar indicates the position of the probe for genomic Southern blot
analysis using SmaI and BamHI digested samples (mutated allele, 3,730 bp; wild-type
allele, 5,750 bp). B. Genomic DNA from ES cells was digested with SmaI and BamHI and
subjected to hybridization with the probe. Lane 1, markers; Lanes 2–5, wild type;
Lanes 6, gene-targeted ES clones; Lane 7, wild type; Lane 8, none; Lane 9,
gene-targeted ES clones; Lane 10, wild type; Lane 11, gene-targeted ES clones. C.
Schematic representation of the Otx2 gene and secondary targeting
strategy. The red-colored bar indicates the position of the probe for genomic
Southern blot analysis using EcoRV and ScaI digested samples (mutated allele, 4,041
bp; wild-type allele, 6,728 bp). D. Genomic DNA from ES cells was digested with
EcoRV and ScaI and subjected to hybridization with the probe. Lane 1, markers; Lanes
2 and 3, gene-targeted ES clones; Lane 4, wild type; Lane 5, gene-targeted ES clone.
E. Establishment of ES cells without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes. Scale bars represent 200 µm. F.
Chromosome banding of the ES cells without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes. Scale bars represent 50 µm. G.
Chimeric mice generated from the ES cells without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes.
Embryo culture and manipulation to prepare Pdx1−/− blastocyst
complementation
Pdx1+/− mice, which were developed by Hashimoto et
al. [7], were backcrossed onto the
IQI/Jic strain (CIEA, Kawasaki, Japan) for more than 5 generations. Then, the preparation
of Pdx1 heterozygous intercrossing embryos was carried out in accordance
with published protocols [16]. In brief, embryos
for injection were collected upon crossing Pdx1+/− male mice
and superovulated Pdx1+/− female mice. Their embryos were
cultured with potassium simplex optimized medium (KSOM; ARK Resource Co., Ltd., Kumamoto,
Japan) until the blastocyst stage. For micromanipulation, G-mESCs were trypsinized and
suspended in G-mESCs culture medium. Approximately 10 G-mESCs were introduced into
blastocyst cavities near the ICM. After blastocyst injection, mouseblastocysts were
transferred into the uteri of pseudopregnant recipient ICR mice at an embryonic age of 2.5
days.
Animal husbandry
All the mice were provided with exclusive feed for laboratory animals (CA-1, CLEA, Tokyo,
Japan) and tapwater ad libitum. After weaning, two to three mice were
kept in an open cage. The animal room was maintained at 24 ± 2°C with 55 ± 10% relative
humidity and 12 h of artificial lighting from 08:00 to 20:00 and was kept under specific
pathogen-free conditions, which were the same as in a previous study [8]. The glucose tolerance test was performed when mice
were 6 weeks of age. The Animal Committee of the Central Institute for Experimental
Animals approved this study (Permit No. 14050A).
Genotyping
The Pdx1 mutation and wild type were distinguished by genotyping PCR
using mouse tail to exclude the wild type because the genotyping PCR was unable to
distinguish between the Pdx1−/− and
Pdx1+/− mice by the contribution of the donorG-mESCs to the
tail of chimeric mouse. The genotyping PCR was performed in accordance with a previous
report [7]. After selecting the mutant mice,
hematopoietic cells were taken from their orbital sinus, and GFP-negative cells were
sorted. Then, genotyping PCR was performed to identify the
Pdx1−/− mice using the sorted GFP-negative cells.
Glucose tolerance test
All the mice were fasted for at least 16 h before the study. Then, they were challenged
with an oral glucose dose of 1.0 mg/g body weight. Blood samples were taken from the
retro-orbital sinus using a heparinized capillary tube at 0, 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120
min after glucose administration, and blood glucose concentrations were measured using an
automatic blood glucose meter (Arkray Inc., Kyoto, Japan). Blood samples at 0, 15, and 30
min after glucose administration were collected and centrifuged in heparinized tubes, and
the plasma was stored at −20°C. A commercially available ELISA kit (Cat No. MS302;
Morinaga Institute of Biological Science, Inc., Yokohama, Japan) was used to assay plasma
insulin. Pdx1+/− and IQI/Jic strain mice were used for
comparisons with PPOmice. IQI/Jic strain mice were selected as the
control because the genetic background of both the Pdx1+/−
mice and blastocysts to generate PPOmice was the IQI/Jic strain.
Fluorescence and phase contrast microscopy
A microscopy (VB-6010, Keyence, Osaka, Japan) and GFP filter (OP-42313, Keyence) were
used to observe mouse internal organs under fluorescence and phase-contrast conditions
(phase).
Immunohistochemistry
Sections fixed in 10% buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin were mounted on
silane-coated glass slides and immunostained by using a Leica Bond-Max automatic
immunostainer (Leica Biosystems, Mount Waverley, VIC, Australia). Paraffin sections were
dewaxed in a Bond Dewax solution and rehydrated in alcohol and Bond Wash solution (Leica
Biosystems). Detection was performed using a Bond Polymer Refine Detection system. Then,
the sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. Immunohistochemical analysis was
performed with polyclonal rabbit anti-GFP (Product code ab290, Abcam plc, Cambridge,
UK).
Reproduction and germline transmission
To confirm germline transmission, the chimeras were mated to intact IQI/Jic strain mice.
GFP expression of the infants was detected with a microscopy (VB-6010, Keyence) and GFP
filter (OP-42313, Keyence).
Results
Reproductive rates of chimeric mice
To generate chimeric mice, G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes were injected into blastocysts obtained by crossing
Pdx1− male mice with
Pdx1− female mice. We genotyped GFP-negative
peripheral blood molecular cells from 7-week-old infants. The
Pdx1−− genotype was
present in 20 of the 77 infants (26.0%, 12 males and 8 females) complemented by G-mESCs
without the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes (Table 1). On the other hand, the
Pdx1−− genotype
was present in 22 of the 74 infants (29.7%, 13 males and 9 females) complemented by
G-mESCs with Prdm14 and Otx2 genes (Table 1). Fifteen of the PPOmice and 13 of the
Pdx1−− mice
complemented by G-mESCs with Prdm14 and Otx2 genes
(control) were used for analysis (Table
2). The 0% chimeras were excluded from further study. The remaining male
control mice (including some >50% chimeras) were used for preliminary
investigation.
Table 1.
Results of chimera mice by utilization of G-mESCs without
Prdm14 and Otx2 genes
Genotypingof recipient
UsedG-mESCs
No. of embryostransferred
No. of chimeras
Genotype of chimerasa
No. of chimerism (%)
−/−
+/−
+/+
Male
Female
Male
Female
Male
Female
>50%
<50%
100%
Pdx1+/–×
Pdx1+/–
Prdm14–/–,Otx2–/–
220
77 (35.0%)
12
8
22
12
15
8
17 (22.1%)
52 (67.5%)
8 (10.4%)
Pdx1+/–×
Pdx1+/–
Prdm14+/+,Otx2+/+(intact
cells)
189
74 (39.1%)
13
9
26
8
13
5
18 (24.3%)
46 (62.2%)
10 (13.5%)
Table 2.
Number of chimerism in Pdx1 mice complemented by
G-ESCs without Prdm14 and Otx2 genes
Genotyping of recipient
Used G-mESCs
Gender
No. of chimerism (%)
0%
>50%
<50%
100%
Pdx1−/−
Prdm14−/−,
Otx2−/−
Males
3
3
5
1
Females
2
4
2
0
Pdx1−/−
Prdm14+/+,
Otx2+/+ (intact cells)
Males
2
3
valign="top"7
1
Females
2
5
2
0
Characteristics of PPO mice
In immunohistochemical analysis, GFPs were detected from to the thyroid gland (Fig. 2A), lung (Fig. 2B), and heart (Fig. 2C) in PPOmice. Additionally,
the G-mESCs contributed to the liver (Fig. 2D),
spleen (Fig. 2E), intestines (Fig. 2F), and kidney (Fig. 2G) in PPOmice, although they were not
detected under a fluorescent microscope (Fig.
2I). Upon observation under a fluorescent microscope, G-mESCs contributed to the
pancreas highly in the abdominal cavity of the PPOmice (Figs. 2H and I) and immunohistochemistry revealed
high expressions of GFP in the pancreas of PPOmice (Fig. 2J). On the other hand, the pancreatic reconstitution of
Pdx1−/+ mice complemented by G-mESCs without the
Prdm14 and Otx2 genes showed mosaicism (Fig. 2K). Additionally, impaired glucose tolerance
of the Pdx1−/− mice without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes was improved by blastocyst complementation, although the
male Pdx1−/− mice showed impaired glucose tolerance (Fig. 2L). Glucose tolerance test of female
Pdx1−/− mice also was same result (Fig. 2M).
Fig. 2.
Characteristics of PPO mice. A–G. GFP immunohistochemistry in
PPO mice; thyroid gland (A), lung (B), heart (C), liver (D),
spleen (E), intestines (F), and kidney (G). H. Observations of the pancreas in a
male PPO mouse under phase. The area enclosed by the dotted line
indicates the pancreas reconstituted by G-mESCs. I. Observations of the pancreas in
a male PPO mouse under GFP fluorescence. The area enclosed by the
dotted line indicates the pancreas reconstituted by G-mESCs. J. GFP
immunohistochemistry of the pancreas in PPO mice. K. GFP
immunohistochemistry of the pancreas in Pdx1+/− mice
complemented by ES cells without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes. L. Oral glucose tolerance test in male
PPO mice at 10 weeks of age. M. Oral glucose tolerance test in
female PPO mice at 10 weeks of age. Data are presented as the mean
± SE. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (Student’s
t-test) compared with value for
Pdx1+/− and IQI/Jic strain mice. Black circles or
trigonal marks represent PPO mice. Gray circles or trigonal marks
represent Pdx1+/−. Open circles or trigonal marks
represent intact mice (IQI/Jic strain). Scale bars represent the following
distances: A, 100 µm; B, C, E–G, J, and K: 200 µm;
and D, 400 µm.
Characteristics of PPOmice. A–G. GFP immunohistochemistry in
PPOmice; thyroid gland (A), lung (B), heart (C), liver (D),
spleen (E), intestines (F), and kidney (G). H. Observations of the pancreas in a
male PPOmouse under phase. The area enclosed by the dotted line
indicates the pancreas reconstituted by G-mESCs. I. Observations of the pancreas in
a male PPOmouse under GFP fluorescence. The area enclosed by the
dotted line indicates the pancreas reconstituted by G-mESCs. J. GFP
immunohistochemistry of the pancreas in PPOmice. K. GFP
immunohistochemistry of the pancreas in Pdx1+/− mice
complemented by ES cells without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes. L. Oral glucose tolerance test in male
PPOmice at 10 weeks of age. M. Oral glucose tolerance test in
female PPOmice at 10 weeks of age. Data are presented as the mean
± SE. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 (Student’s
t-test) compared with value for
Pdx1+/− and IQI/Jic strain mice. Black circles or
trigonal marks represent PPOmice. Gray circles or trigonal marks
represent Pdx1+/−. Open circles or trigonal marks
represent intact mice (IQI/Jic strain). Scale bars represent the following
distances: A, 100 µm; B, C, E–G, J, and K: 200 µm;
and D, 400 µm.
Evaluations of the contributions of G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes to
gametes and the brain in chimeric mice
G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes did not
contribute to spermatozoa and the testes in Pdx1−/− mice
(Figs. 3A and B), although they did contribute to other reproductive organs (Figs. 3C–F). G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes did not contribute to oocytes, ovirio cells, and ovaries in
the Pdx1−/− mice without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes (Figs. 3G and H),
although they did contribute to oviducts and uterus (Figs. 3I–L), which was similar to the case in the control mice. Additionally,
G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes did not
contribute to the brain (Figs. 3M–P).
Fig. 3.
Contributions of the G-ESCs without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes to gametes and the brain. A. GFP immunohistochemistry
of spermatozoa and testes in PPO mice. B. GFP immunohistochemistry
of spermatozoa and testes in control mice. C. Observations of male reproductive
organs under phase. Areas enclosed by dotted lines indicate the testes. There was no
macroscopic difference between the PPO and control testis. D.
Observations of male reproductive organs under GFP fluorescence. Areas enclosed by
dotted lines indicate the testes. The GFP was not detected in the testis of
PPO mice. E. Magnification of testes and epididymis in a
PPO mouse under phase. Areas enclosed by dotted lines indicate
testes of PPO and control mice. Arrows indicate the epididymides.
F. Magnification of testis and epididymis in PPO mouse under GFP
fluorescence. Areas enclosed by the dotted lines show testis in PPO
and control. Arrows show the epididymis. G. GFP immunohistochemistry of the ovary in
PPO mice. H. GFP immunohistochemistry of the ovary in control
mice. I. Observations of female reproductive organs under phase. Areas enclosed by
dotted lines indicate the ovaries. There was no macroscopic difference between the
PPO and control ovary. J. Observations of female reproductive
organs under GFP fluorescence. Areas enclosed by dotted lines indicate the ovaries.
The GFP was not detected in the ovary of PPO mice. K. Magnification
of female reproductive organs in the PPO mouse under phase. Areas
enclosed by dotted lines indicate the ovaries in the PPO mouse.
Arrows indicate the oviducts. L. Magnification of female reproductive organs in the
PPO mouse under GFP fluorescence. Areas enclosed by dotted lines
indicate the ovaries in the PPO mouse. Arrows indicate the
oviducts. M. GFP immunohistochemistry of the brain in PPO mice. N.
GFP immunohistochemistry of the brain in control mice. O. Observations of the brain
in PPO mice and control mice under phase. There was no macroscopic
difference between the PPO and control brain. P. Observations of
the brain in PPO mice and control mice under GFP fluorescence. The
GFP was not detected in the brain of PPO mice. Scale bars represent
the following distances: A, B, G, and H, 100 µm; M and N, 400
µm.
Contributions of the G-ESCs without the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes to gametes and the brain. A. GFP immunohistochemistry
of spermatozoa and testes in PPOmice. B. GFP immunohistochemistry
of spermatozoa and testes in control mice. C. Observations of male reproductive
organs under phase. Areas enclosed by dotted lines indicate the testes. There was no
macroscopic difference between the PPO and control testis. D.
Observations of male reproductive organs under GFP fluorescence. Areas enclosed by
dotted lines indicate the testes. The GFP was not detected in the testis of
PPOmice. E. Magnification of testes and epididymis in a
PPOmouse under phase. Areas enclosed by dotted lines indicate
testes of PPO and control mice. Arrows indicate the epididymides.
F. Magnification of testis and epididymis in PPOmouse under GFP
fluorescence. Areas enclosed by the dotted lines show testis in PPO
and control. Arrows show the epididymis. G. GFP immunohistochemistry of the ovary in
PPOmice. H. GFP immunohistochemistry of the ovary in control
mice. I. Observations of female reproductive organs under phase. Areas enclosed by
dotted lines indicate the ovaries. There was no macroscopic difference between the
PPO and control ovary. J. Observations of female reproductive
organs under GFP fluorescence. Areas enclosed by dotted lines indicate the ovaries.
The GFP was not detected in the ovary of PPOmice. K. Magnification
of female reproductive organs in the PPOmouse under phase. Areas
enclosed by dotted lines indicate the ovaries in the PPOmouse.
Arrows indicate the oviducts. L. Magnification of female reproductive organs in the
PPOmouse under GFP fluorescence. Areas enclosed by dotted lines
indicate the ovaries in the PPOmouse. Arrows indicate the
oviducts. M. GFP immunohistochemistry of the brain in PPOmice. N.
GFP immunohistochemistry of the brain in control mice. O. Observations of the brain
in PPOmice and control mice under phase. There was no macroscopic
difference between the PPO and control brain. P. Observations of
the brain in PPOmice and control mice under GFP fluorescence. The
GFP was not detected in the brain of PPOmice. Scale bars represent
the following distances: A, B, G, and H, 100 µm; M and N, 400
µm.
Reproduction and germline transmission in PPO mice
The fertility rates (Fig. 4A) and the number of infants produced by the male and female PPOmice did not differ from those of the control mice. Of the 80 male and 77 female infants
produced by the control mice, the numbers of male and female GFP-positive infants were 55
(68.7%) and 21 (27.2%), respectively (Fig. 4B).
On the other hand, of the 74 male and 73 female infants produced by the
PPOmice (Fig. 4B), none of
the infants showed GFP fluorescence (Fig.
4C).
Fig. 4.
Reproduction and germline transmission in PPO mice. A. Fertility
rates and number of infants. B. Rates of GFP-positive infants from
PPO and control mice. The rates were analyzed by
χ2-test. **Significant difference of P<0.01. C.
Confirmation of germline transmission.
Reproduction and germline transmission in PPOmice. A. Fertility
rates and number of infants. B. Rates of GFP-positive infants from
PPO and control mice. The rates were analyzed by
χ2-test. **Significant difference of P<0.01. C.
Confirmation of germline transmission.
Discussion
Studies examining blastocyst complementation using human PS cells are promoted by the
Nakauchi group [13]. In recent years, Kobayashi
et al. (2015) successfully limited and controlled PS cells for endoderm
organs, especially the pancreas, via the inducible expression of the Milx1
gene, a transcription factor that induces differentiation of animal PS cells into the
endoderm [14]. In the present study, we established a
novel blastocyst complementation technique utilizing human PS cells as donor cells.There is a concern in Japan that blastocyst complementation using human PS cells as donor
cells may contribute to the central nervous systems of experimental animals, specifically
that the contribution of human stem cells to the brain may lead to the generation of mice
with human-like intelligence. Although this may seem unlikely, the possibility cannot be
completely ruled out; therefore, it is necessary to address this problem. In a study
conducted by Tian et al. (2002) [22], Otx2-deficientmouse embryos did not develop heads. From this
finding, we hypothesized that Otx2-deficient mESCs would be unlikely to
contribute to the brain in chimeric mice. Indeed, our results showed that G-mESCs without
the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes did not contribute to the brains
of chimeric mice, which addresses one of the concerns surrounding the use of human stem
cells as donor cells for blastocyst complementation.A second concern regarding blastocyst complementation using human stem cells as donor cells
is that these cells may contribute to the gametes, leading to the generation of humanized
gametes and potentially a new form of life. Yamaji et al. (2008) showed
that the Prdm14 gene was associated with the development of germ cells in
mice and that Prdm14-deficient mice displayed a lack of germ cells [25]. In the present study, the gametes, testes, and
ovaries of PPOmice were also formed by recipient cells. In the previous
study by Yamaji et al. (2008), the testes and ovaries in
Prdm14-deficient mice were shown to exhibit atrophy [25]. Therefore, Prdm14-deficient ES
cells may be unlikely to contribute to the gametes, testes, or ovaries. In addition, female
chimeras were considered to be theoretically unable to achieve germline transmission [2] because the karyotype of the ES cells used (EGR-G101)
was XY. However, our female chimeras derived from XY ES cells achieved germline transmission
in similar to previous study [15], as did the male
and female chimeras derived from G-mESCs with Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes obtained in our study. On the other hand, the G-mESCs without
the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes successfully interrupted
germline transmission from the male and female chimeras. These results address the second
concern about blastocyst complementation using human stem cells as donor cells. Thus, we
hypothesized that the utilization of Prdm14-deficient ES cells could lead
to the development of blastocyst complementation technology that does not contribute to
gametes.In the present study, CRISPR/Cas9 was used to delete the Prdm14 and
Otx2 genes from a mouse model. CRISPR/Cas9 cut genomic DNA homozygosity
[19, 21], as
did the normal gene targeting methods [8]. However,
homologous recombination via CRISPR/Cas9 was more efficient than that achieved using normal
gene targeting methods [10]. Therefore, the
CRISPR/Cas9 gene knockout method is suitable for use in blastocyst complementation
technology, as the phenotype of the ES cells was expressed in the chimeric mice.
Additionally, the pancreata of Pdx1−/− mice were complemented by
G-mESCs without the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes. These findings
revealed that PDX-1-deficient blastocyst complementation improved the impaired glucose
tolerance, which is in agreement with the results of previous studies indicating that mouseblastocyst complementation using rat iPS cells improved diabetes in
Pdx1−/− mice [13] and
that transplantation of rat pancreata via ratblastocyst complementation using mouse iPS
cells improved streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice [24]. Therefore, we believe that blastocyst complementation using ES cells without
the Prdm14 and Otx2 genes may offer an effective approach
for studies using human stem cells [12, 23], ES cells, iPS cells, and other types of cells.
Authors: Insoo Hyun; Ellen Wright Clayton; Yali Cong; Misao Fujita; Steven A Goldman; Lori R Hill; Nuria Monserrat; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Roger A Pedersen; Heather M Rooke; Jun Takahashi; Jürgen A Knoblich Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 7.765